Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

'Real people' don't make headlines

Thursday, Sept. 23 was an important day. But only some in the media treated it that way.

The Obama health law remains controversial, and unpopular in many quarters, which is no surprise. It's big and complicated and people are understandably worried about costs and coverage. Some of the benefits are front-loaded while the more difficult parts, including the individual mandate to buy insurance, are back-loaded. The Republicans have largely succeeded in painting it as big government run amok.

I can't shake the feeling that journalists are mainly interested in the political controversy. As in, how many Democrats are distancing themselves from Obamacare in the midterms, and how many Republicans are running ads attacking it.

But now some important benefits have kicked in, benefits that affect real families.

--Children can no longer be denied coverage because of preexisting conditions. (Anyone wanna repeal that?)

--Insured people can no longer be dumped by insurance bureacrats who discover technical mistakes on applications.

--Lifetime caps on benefits are now outlawed.

--Adult kids can be carried on their parents' policies until they turn 26.

This is not an argument for Obamacare. But the media are not always at their best when it comes to the impact of government on real people. Unless some outrageous example of corporate heartlessness is involved, there's no conflict to chronicle.

The New York Times did a terrific job with a piece that began:

"Sometimes lost in the partisan clamor about the new health care law is the profound relief it is expected to bring to hundreds of thousands of Americans who have been stricken first by disease and then by a Darwinian insurance system."

Reporter Kevin Sack did three sidebars, on three types of patients who have been affected, in California, Kansas and Virginia.

Katie Couric led the "CBS Evening News" with the health care changes. Diane Sawyer had it second on "World News." But I didn't see it being debated on the nighttime cable shows.

The Washington Post has a short summary of the law's changes on Page 2. I didn't see anyone put it on the front page.

I predict the new benefits will be a one-day story, quickly subsumed by the midterms, the Woodward book, the Facebook movie and Lindsay Lohan's latest drug violation.

The jury is very much out on health care reform. But some important evidence has now been admitted, and we ought to stay on the case.

By Howard Kurtz  | September 24, 2010; 6:00 AM ET
Categories:  Latest stories, Top story  | Tags:  Obama, Obamacare, health care, health reform, media, repeal  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Palin hits 'Barack Hussein Obama'
Next: One-click Friday roundup

Comments


You guys should stop complaining because, one the health care we have now isnt as good as it was supposed to be. also the law has just been signed so give it some time. so if u want to say u have the right to choose tell that to ur congress men or state official. If you do not have insurance and need one You can find full medical coverage at the lowest price by calling 877-882-4740 or check http://bit.ly/9fDY7U If you have health insurance and do not care about cost just be happy about it and trust me you are not going to loose anything!

Posted by: isabelly24 | September 24, 2010 6:35 AM | Report abuse

"trust me", haven't we heard this from politicians before? And we trusted them to give us the best bang for our buck with Social Security, Postal Service, Banking Oversight, the TSA and the list goes on. Oh and remember we trusted the British with all those tea taxes. Now I ask you to "trust me", when I say it doesn't take over 2000 pages of legislation to say what you have said in one sentence. That's your first tip that you are probably gonna get screwed somewhere along the line! When the government starts threatening healthcare providers not to talk about the bill is your second tip! Actually this is a stimulus bill. When the TSA start

Posted by: carbocopy | September 24, 2010 9:28 AM | Report abuse

When the TSA started "protecting" our airports less than 10 people made over 100,000 dollars a year. Now over 1000 personnel make that much. And I will bet you that the same thing happens with the IRS. Old Chinese saying, (no pun intended since that is where the money is coming from), "be careful what you ask for, you just might get it".

Posted by: carbocopy | September 24, 2010 9:34 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company