On June 4, you wrote, "Year in Review: Johns Hopkins. That should be coming tonight or tomorrow."

Both JHU and your concept of timeliness appear to be OVERRATED.

Yes, Johns Hopkins is so overrated. They only made it to the national championship game. What a joke of a team.

Luther, maybe this will suffice:
http://blogs.insidelacrosse.com/2008/06/10/year-in-review-johns-hopkins/

44; We want more!

Thank you Marco for providing the link. I left the Washington Post last week and am working for Inside Lacrosse now.

The Blue Jays had a nice run in the second half of the season, are well coached, and had a very good win in the NCAA semifinals.
I generally agree with what the former-Post employee, Swezey, wrote on InsideLacrosse.com (link above).
But, as Al Smith used to say, "Let's look at the record"
I wrote that J.H.U. was OVERRATED, in PART because they lost SIX (6) games;
to Syracuse (twice - one time at Hopkins, blowing a 3 goal lead in the 4th qtr.), to U.Va. (which split with 'Cuse), to Hofstra, to North Carolina, and to Duke.

The 2008 Jays were out-played three times. UNC (when the Heels were hot), Duke (in the regular season, which they avenged in the semi-final), and Syracuse (in the finals). They had three OT losses (Syracuse, where they blew their lead as Peyser cramped up; UVA Away; and Hofstra Away). Over the course of the season, they could have been ranked anywhere, but at the end of the season, a fair-minded ending ranking is somewhere between 2 and 4. If they were so over-rated, then why was their semi-final victory of Duke a huge upset?

44; We want more!