Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 3:00 PM ET, 08/23/2010

Va. ACLU asks for review of liquor ad ban

By Washington Post editors

The ACLU of Virginia asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to review a federal appeals court ruling upholding a ban on alcohol advertising in Virginia's college newspapers.

In a 2-1 ruling in April, a panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission ban is a minimally restrictive approach to combat problem drinking.

On Monday, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a petition asking the high court to review the ruling. The ACLU says the ban isn't constitutional because there is no proof it diminishes underage or binge drinking on campus.

"College students are bombarded with alcohol ads every day — on television, on the radio, on the Internet, on T-shirts, on baseball caps, and in magazines," said Rebecca Glenberg, an ACLU of Virginia attorney who argued the case. "There is no reason to believe that banning the small fraction of these ads that appear in college newspapers has any impact on student behavior."

The ban prohibits advertising of beer, wine and mixed drinks in college student publications unless in advertisements for dining establishments. It also bans the phrase "happy hour" and references to specific mixed drinks.

Virginia Tech's Collegiate Times and the University of Virginia's Cavalier Daily challenged the ban. In 2008 a U.S. magistrate judge ruled that the ban violated the newspapers' free-speech rights, and invalidated the ban for all state college newspapers.

The state appealed and the federal appeals court ruled in favor of the ban, saying it "is narrowly tailored to serve the board's interest of establishing a comprehensive scheme attacking the problem of underage and dangerous drinking by college students."

The ACLU has countered, and Judge Norman K. Moon agreed in a dissent, that most readers of the college paper are over 21.

Brian Gottstein, a spokesman for the Virginia Attorney General's Office, refused to comment on the petition, saying the 4th Circuit's ruling "speaks for itself."

"The Constitution does not allow government officials to infringe on freedom of the press on a hunch," ACLU of Virginia executive director Kent Willis said. "They need a reason, and it needs to be a good one."

The University of Pittsburgh's student paper, Pitt News, won a similar challenge in 2004 when the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Pennsylvania's ban was unconstitutional because it not only didn't affect underage drinking but also unjustifiably imposed a burden on student media that was not imposed on others.

That decision was written by then-Justice Samuel A. Alito, who now sits on the U.S. Supreme Court.

-- Associated Press

By Washington Post editors  | August 23, 2010; 3:00 PM ET
Categories:  Virginia  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Restaurant Week extended? 5 area blogs
Next: Man charged with DWI in fatal accident

Comments

Some people in this Country have gone "ban happy". There is no reason to ban anything that any person "thinks" might be bad for kids. If you teach your kids right you won't have to worry about what the private buisness do. It is time to keep our Politics out of our social lives. For you people that want to ban everything, go to Cuba and see what life would look like for all of us. We don't need a socialist type Government here!!!!!!!

Posted by: randykree | August 23, 2010 7:09 PM | Report abuse

The ACLU is a good watchdog group that goes after crazies on both the left and right. But good grief, there must be better causes for them to champion that this.

Posted by: checkered1 | August 23, 2010 7:17 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company