Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 7:20 PM ET, 03/ 9/2011

Mark Center suit seeks $30M in damages

By Christy Goodman


The Center for Naval Analyses filed a $30 million lawsuit Wednesday against Duke Realty Corp. for breech of contract.

The lawsuit in Alexandria Circuit Court contends that Duke Realty violated lease obligations for the center’s headquarters in the Mark Center off Seminary Road and Interstate 395. The center’s management signed a lease for a business park campus, not a military installation, said a spokesman for the non-profit research firm that serves federal clients.

The Department of Defense bought the adjacent property from Duke Realty and built a massive complex that will house 6,400 federal workers as part of the 2005 Base Relocation and Closure, or BRAC, moves. The complex includes the office building, parking garages and a bomb-detection facility.

Employees who work at the center will face “a serious negative impact” when the new facility opens, said Robert J. Murray, CAN president and chief executive officer, in a statement.

“We never intended to be part of Fort Belvoir,” Murray said.

Access to our building has already been affected and will get dramatically worse when the new BRAC facilities open,” said Murray, who added that emergency services will not be able to respond as quickly due to traffic congestion. “And CNA now has the unfortunate distinction of having a bomb inspection facility located immediately adjacent to our building.”

The Center for Naval Analyses tried to work with Duke Realty to re-negotiate their lease, which ends in 2015, before filing the suit, he said.

Duke Realty has not returned comment.

By Christy Goodman  | March 9, 2011; 7:20 PM ET
Categories:  Virginia  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: D.C. Mayor Gray retains attorney
Next: Man found dead in Landover

Comments

"breech" should be changed to "breach."

Posted by: fwheelerjr | March 10, 2011 1:42 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company