Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 2:43 PM ET, 07/13/2009

Charter Schools Aren't the Solution

By Stephen Stromberg

By Kitty J. Boitnott
Richmond

The Obama administration and The Post are fascinated with charter schools, but charters do not make sense for Virginia. Maybe charter schools are needed in the District or Chicago, but in Virginia they are a solution looking for a problem.

The first question to consider is whether charter schools actually work. A recent study by the Rand Corp. suggests that they produce about the same results as traditional public schools.

Charter schools haven't flourished in Virginia because our school boards already have the autonomy to create specialty schools. In the Richmond area alone we have schools that specialize in the arts; engineering; communication; languages; the humanities; technology; international studies; leadership and government; global economics; the military; science and mathematics; and technology. We have governor's schools, magnet schools and centers for the gifted, and the list goes on and on. Virginia school boards, unlike those in states where charters have proliferated, don't need charter legislation to allow flexibility and innovation. Our school boards have great autonomy and flexibility. They are free to innovate, and they do.

A candidate for governor in Virginia would do well to research why and how charter schools work in some places and why they are not needed in others. The same candidate also should consider the principle that he who pays the piper calls the tune. When the state, for example, pays only 13 percent of the cost of supporting the schools in Falls Church and less than half the cost statewide, should the state Board of Education be able to dictate to Falls Church what schools it must create?

With local governments providing the majority of the funding for Virginia schools, it is difficult for local taxpayers and school boards to accept a proposal from a candidate for governor to transfer their authority to oversee their schools and their tax dollars to a state-appointed board. Such a transfer of authority probably would require a change in the state's constitution as well.

Virginia is blessed with a strong system of public education. It is one we should constantly strive to improve. Continued experimentation with charter schools can be part of that effort, but undermining the established role of local school boards by having a state that is not funding its fair share of the cost of public education dictate the establishment of charter schools seems unwarranted, not to mention unwise.

The writer is president of the Virginia Education Association.

By Stephen Stromberg  | July 13, 2009; 2:43 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: My Cul-de-Sac Became a College's Ashtray
Next: The Safeguard Metro Missed

Comments

As Rhee gets her second wind.

The For Profit Charter Schools will go away like Health Insurance Companies.

There are just some business models that works better as Capital Model others a Socialist Model.

The key is to integrate their characteristics them so they benefit each other and the public.

Fei Hu

Posted by: Fei_Hu | July 13, 2009 4:52 PM | Report abuse

I write from Oregon and note your argument that Virginia “school boards have great autonomy and flexibility. They are free to innovate, and they do.”

I am curious how far that autonomy and flexibility goes. Further than in Oregon, I’m sure. But can a local school board in Virginia pay all or part of the program fees for a high school student to study abroad? There are many strong arguments as to why we need more students studying abroad and becoming proficient in foreign languages and knowledgeable of foreign cultures and markets. In district program are just not enough.

I note that Virginia’s per pupil expenditure for K-12 in FY 2006 was $9,445.

Please note, as examples, the academic year abroad fees for the following two high school study abroad providers. Such fees typically cover tuition (if any) at a foreign high school, room and board with a host family, round-trip international travel from a major US city, and medical insurance. Other services are often covered.

ASSE (American Scandinavian Student Exchange) provides the following academic-year study abroad programs: Mexico, $4,900; Finland, $7,550; Romania, $7,550; French Canada, $5,400;Germany, $7,550; Serbia, $7,550; Taiwan, $6,750; Holland, $7,550; Slovakia, $7,550; Hong Kong, $7,500; Italy, $7,550; Spain, $7,550; Mongolia, $7,500; Lithuania, $7,550; Sweden, $7,550; Vietnam, $7,500; Norway, $7,550; Switzerland, $7,550; Czech Republic, $7,550; Poland, $7,550; Turkey, $7,550; Denmark, $7,550; Portugal, $7,550; Ukraine, $7,550; Estonia, $7,550; and France, $8,650.

AFS high school study abroad academic year offerings as of 2/13/09: Chile, $8,900; Costa Rica, $8,900; Czech Republic, $8,900; Dominican Republic, $8,900; Ecuador, $8,900; Egypt, $8,900; Honduras, $8,900; Hungary, $8,900; Latvia, $8,900; Turkey, $8,900; Panama, $8,900; Peru, $8,900; Paraguay, $8,900; Argentina, $9,900; Austria, $9,900; Belgium Flanders, $9,900; Brazil, $9,900; China, $9,900; Denmark, $9,900; Finland, $9,900; Germany, $9,900; Iceland, $9,900; India, $9,900; Indonesia, $9,900; Malaysia, $9,900; Netherlands, $9,900; Portugal, $9,900; Russia, $9,900; South Africa, $9,900; Sweden, $9,900; Thailand, $9,900; Belgium French, $10,900; France, $10,900; Ghana, $10,900; Italy, $10,900; New Zealand, $10,900; and Spain, $10,900.

Could a local school board in Virginia fund high school students to participate in these ASSE or AFS programs? Some programs are less than the annual per pupil costs in local school districts.

Posted by: DavePorter | July 15, 2009 9:21 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company