Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 2:09 PM ET, 12/31/2009

Crowdsourcing Maryland's democracy

By editors

By Heather R. Mizeur and Ryan O’Donnell
Takoma Park

Our state government must be doing something right. Maryland has the best schools in the nation and one of the strongest workforces, and it was ranked by Forbes magazine as one of the top states for business.

Citizen engagement in the political process is vital to fostering that success. In the General Assembly, for example, anyone can testify on any bill in front of any committee. Nevertheless, it’s time to build on that strength by providing better access and more timely, comprehensive information to the public — both in the General Assembly and at the Board of Public Works. This, in turn, will allow our state government to make the best possible decisions.

The General Assembly relies on input from the business owners, doctors, teachers, electricians, social workers and scientists whose livelihoods and missions are affected by state law. This input is critical because most state legislators here have day jobs and can’t be experts on every issue.

For the 90 days every year that the General Assembly convenes to do the state’s business, a torrent of information, opinions and advice flows into Annapolis. To ensure that the voices of everyday Marylanders can rise above that din, we should institute policies that make information as available and engagement as easy as possible.

Reforms should start with the General Assembly’s online legislative tracking system. “Up-to-the-minute” access provides nearly instantaneous information on the bills and proceedings on the House and Senate floors, but it is available only to those in state office buildings and the couple hundred lobbyists willing to pay $800 a year to get these updates faster than once a day.

Greater public access and information could also improve the committee system in Annapolis, where most of the General Assembly’s deliberative work gets done.

Posting committee votes online is a necessary step forward, and one that will help ensure voters can hold their legislators accountable for the decisions they make. But why wait until after the fact? To influence the process, citizens need to be able to participate more reliably. They should be able to watch committee proceedings, sign up to testify online and check the order in which bills will be heard at least one day in advance.

Attention must also be paid to the Board of Public Works, which is made up of Maryland’s governor, comptroller and treasurer. This panel has immense power to approve contracts and cut the state budget. In the current fiscal year, for example, it has slashed more than $950 million in spending.

Given its authority, the board is at times decisive to policymaking: In recent months, it has decided to close Chestertown’s Upper Shore Community Mental Health Center, leased the Port of Baltimore’s Seagirt Terminal to a private company for 50 years, eliminated 533 state jobs and moved toward awarding monitoring contracts for the state’s slots facilities. And yet most of these decisions are made with minimal public awareness, input or scrutiny.

It’s time for the Board of Public Works to become as transparent as it is powerful. Its hearings should be broadcast online, its agenda should be posted well in advance of any meeting and its decisions should be preceded by a period of public comment. It is, after all, our Board of Public Works.

These changes would impose only modest costs, which could be met by a small increase in the registration filing fee for state lobbyists. Because lobbyists would no longer be on the hook for the $800 up-to-the-minute access fee, they might even come out ahead.

Just as companies now routinely open software to beta testing by thousands of users for refinement, so, too, could our state government use information technology to increase public participation in and improve the outcomes of our decision-making. The keys to making this a reality are providing more reliable access to the process and timely, comprehensive information about what state government is doing.

Danish physicist Niels Bohr called openness the “best weapon of a democracy.” We should recommit ourselves to this ethic to give Maryland the edge it needs to continue succeeding in the 21st century.

Heather R. Mizeur (D-Montgomery) is a member of the Maryland House of Delegates and the lead sponsor of the Maryland Open Government Act. Ryan O’Donnell is executive director of Common Cause Maryland.

By editors  | December 31, 2009; 2:09 PM ET
Categories:  HotTopic, Maryland  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Creating a bike-friendly Tysons Corner
Next: Cabin John was high on this hog


There is little doubt that Marylanders would be shocked to find out how little transparency there is in Annapolis. Floor votes of the full Senate and the House of Delegates are posted online, but the vast majority of bills that reach the Floor are adopted -- and that is because the real decisions are made in Committee and Subcommittee hearings. While votes in Committee are recorded, votes on amendments (and the amendments themselves) are often not recorded -- and that voting record is only available to the public by actually going to Annapolis during open hours and asking to see a printed copy. No record at all is taken of the proceedings in Subcommittee (and the myriad of other legislative bodies that shape the bills).

This has to change. How can we hold our legislators accountable if we cannot find out how they are voting? All of this should be posted online.

Del. Mizeur and Mr. O’Donnell point out that "citizens need to be able to participate" in this process, but the difficulty signing up and actually testifying is so onerous that it effectively prohibits most Marylanders from participating. If one can find out when hearings take place (not an easy task), one has to go to Annapolis to sign up, and then, since the schedule when bill-hearings take place is not published on the Web, be prepared to wait all day for the chance to speak for just a few minutes.

This has to change. Signing up to testify should be available over the web, and all schedules should be posted online.

The MD Transparency and Equal Access to Government Coalition (MD TEAG) is a broad collation of organizations that is advocating for just such a change. We know that if concerned citizens and groups get behind a demand for changes, Annapolis will listen. We believe there is a good chance that substantial change is possible this year, but it may take more than one year to bring systemic change, and to that end, we are in this for the long haul. For more information about MD TEAG or to join the Coalition, email

Luis Zapata
Chair, MD TEAG

Posted by: 4zapata | January 4, 2010 10:02 AM | Report abuse

Allowing the voters/taxpayers actually have some information and access to the process make too much sense. That's why it'll never happen in Maryland.

Posted by: PracticalIndependent | January 4, 2010 3:28 PM | Report abuse

With the exception of seeking authority from a Dane when we have a home-grown Supreme Court Justice to guide us on the value of sunlight as a disinfectant for government, I find myself agreeing completely with the authors.

"Holy crap!"

Posted by: BruceLRobinson | January 6, 2010 1:06 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company