Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 7:16 PM ET, 08/ 6/2010

A strategy for statehood

By editors

By Mark Plotkin

Regarding the Aug. 1 Local Opinions letters, “D.C. voting rights: What now?”:

Let’s make it simple and straightforward: Let’s go for statehood for D.C. That’s what we really want, and it is doable. No other contrivance or permutation gives us the rights that every other American takes for granted — full voting representation in the House and the Senate.

To get there, there must be a change in citizen attitude. Years ago, I asked Jesse Jackson when “it would all change.” He eloquently said that our second-class status would change only “when it rises to the level of personal insult.”

That has not happened. Statehood cannot be done with a Republican-controlled House or Senate. There could be a sequence of events in which Puerto Rico and the District would come into the union at the same time. Republicans seem to want Puerto Rico to become a state; Democrats favor the District.

Failing that, every year our delegate must introduce a bill to make the District a state, and every year round up the votes. Every year the number will grow larger. The best model is the designation of Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday as a national holiday. At first, very few signed on, but momentum grew. Republicans started joining. In the end, Ronald Reagan signed the bill.

That it will not be easy should not deter us. There really is no other way.

The writer is the political analyst for WTOP Radio.

By editors  | August 6, 2010; 7:16 PM ET
Categories:  D.C., DC Vote, HotTopic  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: McCain-Coburn stimulus report gets it wrong
Next: A columnist shoots and misses on guns


Feel free to become a state, by the way you realize that that ends the massive subsidies, right? Oh, second thoughts?

Posted by: Nemo24601 | August 7, 2010 6:35 AM | Report abuse

Although I agree with the outrage as the crucial step to action, I think a fuller discussion about what residents want is the first step.

Pros/cons for retrocession?

Posted by: andy_dc2000 | August 8, 2010 3:38 PM | Report abuse

If DC became a state, the federal government would have to immediately invade to restore order. Iraq is paradise in comparison.

Posted by: jiji1 | August 9, 2010 3:46 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company