Would Fenty do a better job if he did nothing at all?
Many people speculated, incorrectly, about my motivations for writing an article suspicious of Adrian Fenty on Friday. The simple fact is this. By all rights, I should love Adrian Fenty. He's aligned with me on most policy issues. However, I have serious doubts about supporting him. Why?
Maybe it's the way he seems to show contempt for the legislature, even when they try to work with him. Maybe it's the way he has an attorney general who stonewalls anyone who asks questions about anything. Maybe it's the way he just refused to implement the Inclusionary Zoning law for two years.
Or maybe it's the way that whenever he's personally involved in something instead of leaving it to his people, it's been for the worse. On Friday, I asked why this is the case. Why does Mayor Fenty seem to stand behind every Michelle Rhee decision but not every Gabe Klein one? How does he choose when to intervene politically in a decision of a cabinet official and when doesn't he?
Continue reading this piece by David Alpert at Greater Greater Washington here.
David Alpert is founder and editor of Greater Greater Washington . The Local Blog Network is a group of bloggers from around the D.C. region who have agreed to make regular contributions to All Opinions Are Local.
| August 30, 2010; 2:44 PM ET
Categories: D.C., D.C. politics, Fenty, HotTopic, Local blog network, Mayor Fenty
Save & Share: Previous: The ambulance fee debate: Not so black and white
Next: It's 1-1 for Cuccinelli
Posted by: starclimber9 | August 30, 2010 5:55 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: concernedaboutdc | August 30, 2010 7:42 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: candycane1 | September 1, 2010 8:31 AM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.