Slashes keep creeping into Metro's station names
Neighborhood blog JDLand reported last week that ANC 6D voted to support a proposal by the Capitol Riverfront Business Improvement District to add more words to the Navy Yard Metrorail station name. The BID is angling to alter the title to some kind of combination of "Capitol Riverfront/Ballpark/Navy Yard" -- while the ANC also voted in support of adding "Arena Stage" to the Waterfront/SEU station name.
We're not begrudging the mission of the BID, whose job is to let people know what's in the area. But is there really anyone in the District who doesn't know by now -- or, if they're from out of town, cannot just consult a map to discover -- that Nationals Park is located at Navy Yard?
This isn't a new debate. Metro station names have gotten somewhat out of hand over the past 15 years, especially on the Green Line. (Excuse me while I hop on at U Street/Cardozo/African-American Civil War Memorial, roll through Mount Vernon Square/7th Street/Convention Center, and then exit at Archives/Navy Memorial/Penn Quarter.) It's station name creep, plain and simple, and it's especially galling when you think about how, at the genesis of the Metrorail system, the names had a limit of 15 characters.
The Great Society Subway tells us that Metro's original planners were told to keep station names to two words at the most. Compare that guideline to the 52 characters in the U Street station name, and you can see how far Metro's naming conventions have drifted off course. Matt Johnson has produced this excellent graph, analysis and map, which outlines nicely the argument that WMATA would be served just as well with truncated station names.
The District should take solace in the fact that there are so many nice, shiny things popping up along the Green Line that bear boasting about. But does extending the names of these stations actually improve service or just confuse people? Like mom always said: Keep it simple, stupid.
| September 20, 2010; 2:03 PM ET
Categories: D.C., HotTopic, Local blog network, Metro, transportation
Save & Share: Previous: Senators play hardball with airports authority
Next: A tax break for Lockheed Martin?
Posted by: krickey7 | September 21, 2010 9:36 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: mkarns | September 21, 2010 10:44 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: bowmanrand1 | September 22, 2010 4:31 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.