Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 9:59 PM ET, 10/ 9/2010

Putting Washington teens back to work

By washingtonpost.com editors

By Nicole M. Coomer and Walter J. Wessels

The fact that one in four teens in the labor force nationwide is unemployed is disturbing. The fact that, on average, one out of every two teens in the District’s labor force is unemployed? That’s downright scary.

To get a concrete sense of just how desperate the employment situation for teens was this summer, all you have to do is look at D.C.’s Summer Youth Employment Program. The cash-strapped city ended up spending $34.2 million on the program instead of the budgeted $22.7 million — a 50 percent spike — and the city’s Department of Employment Services reported that 83 percent of participants wouldn’t have had a job without the program.

Early employment, like a summer job, is crucial to avoiding a host of undesirable labor market outcomes. But unfortunately the numbers in the District are grim: As of July, only 13 percent of all teens were employed. D.C.’s teen unemployment rate — the proportion of teens actively looking for work who are unable to find it — was averaging nearly 48 percent, almost double the national average.

It’s impossible to pin the job woes of D.C.’s teens on any one factor. The weak economy certainly hasn’t helped, and there are a variety of sociological and structural issues unique to employment in Washington that are difficult to sort out: For instance, the District has a larger percentage of its residents living below the poverty level than do many states.

That said, our new study for the Employment Policies Institute suggests that Washington — and other cities and states around the country — may have done the least experienced members of their workforce a disservice by expanding the coverage of the minimum wage.

Among economists, it’s generally accepted that increases to the minimum wage decrease job opportunities for entry-level employees; we weren’t terribly surprised, then, to find that a 10 percent increase in the minimum wage correlated to a 2.3 percent drop in employment for 16-to-19-year-olds.

But that wasn’t all we found. Interestingly, we discovered that employment losses are considerably greater, as high as 11.1 percent, for teens working in jobs that pay the minimum wage.

These losses are moderated when teens find entry-level work at businesses that aren’t covered by the federal statute governing the minimum wage. For instance, many businesses are too small to be covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act, and some pay less than the federal minimum wage. Seeking such employment helps keep the total teen job loss down after a minimum-wage hike.

But not in Washington. The city has passed legislation expanding coverage of the minimum wage to jobs not covered by the federal law, eliminating a viable alternative source of employment for the less-experienced youth of the city.

Publicly funded stopgaps such as the District’s Summer Youth Employment Program only go so far. Many private employers can’t afford to pay teenagers the wage mandated by the city, so instead of investing in overpriced labor they invest in automation or shift to more self-service. This classic substitution of capital for labor is one reason you’re seeing more self-checkout lanes at the local Safeway and CVS.

The youth labor crisis that occurred in the last large recession in the early 1980s may be repeating itself. Teens across the District are missing out on valuable on-the-job training that’s needed to move up in the job market. As the National Bureau of Economic Research and others have documented, the effect of prolonged unemployment on teens is often negative and lasting both in terms of future earnings and employment.

If legislators are looking for ways to help teenagers find meaningful jobs, our research suggests there’s a better answer than publicly funded programs that stretch the District’s budget. The District’s law now in effect says, “If you can’t produce value equal to the minimum wage or more for each hour worked, then you are prohibited from working.” The burden of a high minimum wage is falling on these less-experienced workers, and it would only be appropriate to allow some employers to pay them a wage commensurate with their skills.

Nicole M. Coomer is an economist at the Workers Compensation Research Institute. Walter J. Wessels is a professor of economics at North Carolina State University. The nonprofit Employment Policies Institute, which provided some of the funding for their study, receives financing from businesses and others with an interest in minimum wage policy.

By washingtonpost.com editors  | October 9, 2010; 9:59 PM ET
Categories:  D.C., economy  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: A vote for ambulance fees is a vote for the poor
Next: Keeping the D.C. schools on track

Comments

Those aged 18-19 are also adults and not "kids" or "teens", meaning they shouldn't be called those words. The authors of this article broke that rule by calling people in those ages "teen" when they are young women or young men. The minimum wage can't discriminate on the basis of age so if a 17-year old works in Washington, D.C., the minimum for that person must be the same for a person who is 59 years old. Helping young women, young women along with girls and boys who are 15-17 is important because with job experience, they can create a better resume. This resume shows what they've done their life because this aspect is as important as holding a Bachelor's degree since a Bachelor degree doesn't tell the whole story as an individual.

Posted by: LibertyForAll | October 9, 2010 11:46 PM | Report abuse

If you are a serious investor interested in business and finance then you should check Investor's Business Daily http://bit.ly/aHFAp3

Posted by: brockpeters10 | October 10, 2010 12:51 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company