Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 10:57 AM ET, 03/ 4/2011
LOCAL BLOG NETWORK

Civil unions for all?

By Todd Eberly

In a report at MyFoxDC, Prince George's Del. Tiffany Alston position has been clarified considerably. Alston wishes to do away with marriage altogether, and have Maryland recognize only civil unions.

"I believe, as a government, we should issue something that is the same for everybody ... And I think, if we wanted to issue a license to everybody and call it a civil union license. And then everybody in the state -- whether heterosexual or homosexual - would get the same exact license."

This position clarification makes clear that she recognizes that it would be discriminatory to have marriage for one group and civil unions for another -- there would be no separate-but-equal issue, as I wrote about yesterday. But have we really come to this? Is Alston really saying that she would rather see "marriage" cease to exist in Maryland than extend the right to marry to same sex couples? Following the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending racial segregation in public schools, many state and local governments resisted integration. The Virginia Assembly passed laws allowing the governor to close integrated schools. In Prince Edward, Va., every public school in the county was closed to avoid integration.

This is just not the path we should be following.

[Continue reading Todd Eberly's post at The FreeStater Blog.]

Todd Eberly blogs at The FreeStaterBlog. The Local Blog Network is a group of bloggers from around the D.C. region who have agreed to make regular contributions to All Opinions Are Local.

By Todd Eberly  | March 4, 2011; 10:57 AM ET
Categories:  HotTopic, Local blog network, Maryland, same-sex marriage  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Separate but equal in Maryland?
Next: An experiment in urbanism

Comments

Yea, Whatever. Not much substance to this topic. Way to much discussion over the use of a word.

Posted by: DennisSmolak | March 6, 2011 8:53 AM | Report abuse

Civil unions for all, yes. And ending such a union should be less tortuous than ending a marriage in MD. Like it's the state's business to throw up roadblocks for citizens' personal decisions.

Posted by: vmax02rider | March 6, 2011 5:22 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company