Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: AdamKilgoreWP and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Sports and Redskins  |  RSS

Lineups

First, I'll just post the lineups.

I'll be back in an hour or so with a few pre-game morsels.

In the meantime, you can read about last night's game here. It gave the Nats their first series victory since... um... May 12-15 against New York. It also ended with a decision to send Tyler Clippard back down to Columbus. This morning, Clippard is still around the Washington clubhouse, so the transaction hasn't yet become official -- but it will before the Minnesota series, which begins Tuesday. Enter: Paul Lo Duca.

Washington

Guzman - 6
Dukes - 9
Milledge - 8
Young - DH
Flores - 2
Belliard - 5
Boone - 3
Lopez - 4
Pena - 7
(Redding - 1)

Seattle

Ichiro - 8
Lopez - 4
Ibanez - 7
Beltre - 5
Video - DH
Johjima - 2
Reed - 9
Cairo - 3
Bloomquist - 6
(Washburn - 1)

By Chico Harlan  |  June 15, 2008; 2:51 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: A technicality, a debate, a scouting report and a recommendation
Next: Paul Lo Duca: utility man

Comments

This has to be one of the worst matchups of 1B I've ever seen.

Posted by: TP | June 15, 2008 3:08 PM | Report abuse

I think it's pretty funny that for some reason you guys bash Chico for his Nats coverage.

He's new on the job so cut him some slack. Like any of you could do any better. Plus you all know it can't be fun covering a team that stinks as much as the Nats do this year.

Posted by: O's Exec | June 15, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse

Willy Mo - ya feel like bustin' loose, bustin' loose?

Posted by: flynnie | June 15, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse

Bummer that LoDu's healthy. I guess we bid farewell to Wil the Thril? If the FO feels ok dumping $1.5 Mill (Makowacky), what's another $3.5 Mill?

Posted by: gnatsgnation.blogspot.com | June 15, 2008 3:23 PM | Report abuse

And people complain we don't go after enough free agents... maybe they could make up their minds...

Posted by: VT Nats Fan | June 15, 2008 3:33 PM | Report abuse

I DARE the Post to make this the post of the day:

*******************************************

Flush with excitement after having Chico Harlan crawl in and kiss his prostate, Steven of Capitol Hill expoundeth thus:

"Finally, I don't hate Bowden. I don't really care about him personally."

Yeah, right. And Captain Ahab loved and respected Moby Dick as a mammal, too. Nothing personal in that vendetta, either.

Posted by: Section 419+1 | June 15, 2008 1:21 PM

Posted by: flynnie | June 15, 2008 3:40 PM | Report abuse

Lastings Milledge
.250/.318/.371/.689
R 30/BI 35/HR 5/SB 11

Adam Jones
.257/.296/.384/.680
R 24/BI 26/HR 4/SB 5

Yikes, considering the O's better lineup I guess that Jones guy should be producing a bit more than Milledge, but he's not even as good. Thank goodness he only cost them Beddard.

Posted by: NatBisquit | June 15, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse

Pop some corn and get the brooms out. A sweet sweep could be a daddys daydream come true. GO NATS...STAY WARM

Posted by: SC Nats Fan | June 15, 2008 4:02 PM | Report abuse

How about those pre-game morsels.

1-0

Posted by: Barely Svrluga | June 15, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse

Put. That mac-and-cheese. Down.

Mac-and-cheese is for MAJOR LEAGUERS ONLY!

Posted by: Clippard | June 15, 2008 4:37 PM | Report abuse

Redding seems to have either hit a wall, or the wall is falling on him in his past few starts. This already looks like the sixth inning.

Posted by: leetee1955 | June 15, 2008 4:49 PM | Report abuse

I'm up, already.

Posted by: new post | June 15, 2008 4:49 PM | Report abuse

To NatBisquit -- The big difference between Jones and Milledge is that Jones is actually a center fielder with defensive skills. Milledge is, or should be, a left fielder. Anyone who has watched the two play could clearly see that. And it's short sighted to compare the two simply on the basis of offensive numbers.

Moreover, while he was the center piece of the deal, it's incorrect to imply that he was traded straight up for Bedard. He was part of a 5-for-1 deal. Milledge, on the other hand, did cost the Nats two starters.

Posted by: blueson | June 15, 2008 5:50 PM | Report abuse

What Chico needs to do when he writes the game story is to tell me what happened in the game. This morning I read all about these sub-plots and drama but could only figure out how the Nats scored two runs and that was on the Flores homer. No mention at all on how they scored the other three runs.

Posted by: JT | June 15, 2008 8:42 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company