Why Releasing Favre Would Be Problematic for Packers

Quick, think of an NFL team or two that is only a capable quarterback away from being a Super Bowl contender.

For me, the two that come immediately to mind are the Chicago Bears and Minnesota Vikings.

And that's why it would be problematic for the Green Bay Packers to release Brett Favre.

One of the interesting aspects of the reports saying that Favre is considering playing this season, after announcing his retirement early in the offseason, is the possibility that it won't be with the Packers. There have been some reports that Favre has asked the Packers to release him, which would make him a free agent with the ability to choose his next club.

But if the Packers do that, they open the possibility that Favre would land with a team that could stand in Green Bay's path to a Super Bowl. The rival Bears and Vikings are both quarterback-needy but have plenty of other elements for championship-level success.

So while it's possible that Favre could return to the Packers, and perhaps even possible that Green Bay could trade him to another team of its choosing, it seems highly unlikely that the Packers would release Favre and allow him to choose a new NFL home.

By Mark Maske |  July 4, 2008; 12:54 PM ET  | Category:  Packers
Previous: Bears Almost Done Signing Draft Picks | Next: Key NFL Question No. 1: Will Favre Play?

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



If Favre comes back and is signed with another NFL North team, his status as a God, demi or otherwise, in GB will be reduced to ZERO!

He left at the top of his game, something I think he said he wanted to do. He'll play one more so-so season and then retire... AGAIN! But then who will care about him?

Get over yourself Brett!

Posted by: Roofelstoon | July 4, 2008 5:04 PM

Favre should stay retired. His diva dramatics just suck the air out of the floor. Give Aaron Rodgers a chance and get out of the way. I thought something was fishy when Favre kept stalling on submitting his retirement papers. And if he stays retired, that means (I hope) that John Madden cannot ever mention that self-absorbed clown during an NFL broadcast (Madden used to talk about him even when GBay wasn't playing). I don't care about Favre; he has held Green Bay, and the league, hostage long enough. Set us free, Brett.

Posted by: Broadway Joe | July 4, 2008 6:03 PM

If I here one more thing about Brett Favre, I'm gonna f@#kin' scream!!! He's a great QB, but why do we have to hear interviews from his mother and brother about how the Packers don't appreciate him?

Go Away Brett!!!!!!!!! Hey, Madden, can you talk to your son please....

Posted by: sicwidit | July 4, 2008 9:56 PM

Mr. Favre, please just stay retired and go out on top - not on top with a SB ring I understand, but on top in the hearts and minds of many.

Don't be another Jordan!

PS - Dear NFL and all the networks, please give Mr. Favre a really, really good job that keeps him useful to the game and also in the public's eye. He can be good to have around and it might keep him off the field, which is surely good for the game.

Posted by: real fan | July 5, 2008 1:08 AM

sharpcommentary,andreal profound--like say aaron rogers heywhydon't y'alll retire from commenting... real profound..hay
this is damage control 101 and y'all fell 4it

Posted by: harmsway | July 5, 2008 8:04 PM

Favre hasn't handled this whole retirement thing well, no doubt. And his timing now is not necessarily appreciated by many of us Packer folks who are trying to move on. That said, Ted Thompson has wanted Favre out of there for 2 years - and it's Ted Thompson's handling of this whole Favre thing that really needs to be questioned. Fact is, if Favre did come back, while many of us are confident Rodgers will be good eventually, we know Favre's good now and we just want to win. So we'd all welcome Favre back for another year if it worked out that way. And, by the way, Mark, you floating with the wrong rumor - there is no way Favre ends up with the CVikes or the Bears - no way.

Posted by: awh | July 7, 2008 8:23 AM

Let's not get sentimental about legacy issues here guys. This is a $-driven, hard-hitting sport. If he wants to come back, let him. The 2008 season will be all the more exciting if he suits up in purple. With their monster O-line, AP, J. Allen, Minnesota will go all the way to SB XLIII in a face-off for the ages against New England. Imagine that!

Posted by: avadhani | July 7, 2008 11:34 AM

I can understand Favre wanting to come back. He feels he still can win. A couple of problems:
1) Green Bay, the organization and most of the fans, have moved on since Favre's retirement. They have handed the reins over to Rodgers and it's his team. IF Favre comes back and is named starter, Rodgers will sit quietly and then bolt for another team. They fooled him once, shame on them, but they won't fool him twice. Favre comes back, they may win in the short term, but they will lose their supposed future - Rodgers.
2) Favre is signed through 2010. You can't release him, he might end up in Minn or Chi. Favre has put G.B. in a tough spot.
So what does G.B. do? Well, IF Favre announces he is coming back, let him. Sit him on the bench BEHIND Rodgers, who you have already committed the team too. IF Favre stays unretired after that and doesn't make waves, then they have a great insurance policy at QB and no threat he plays against them at any time next year.

Mark - Can the Pack petition the league to have Favre's 08 salary not count against the cap (maybe if he doesn't take a snap)?

Posted by: Dano | July 8, 2008 1:25 PM

While the Minnesota connection makes a lot of sense, the Chicago one doesn't. What Minny offers:
Best RB Tandem in the NFL
Best DL in the NFL
Best Left side of the oline in the NFL
Old QB Coach in Darren Bevel
The West Coast Offense
A great friend in Darren Sharper
Talented young WR
Another element for his huge EGO
A cozy dome to play in
To go to the Super Bowl

Chicago:
Who is running the rock?
How healthy is that D?
A banged up old overrated oline
A hybrid offense
Berrian? No, Mushin? No, who again at WR?
Cold and soggy Soldier Field
The best case, 8-8

Where would you want to go?

Posted by: Browntollio | July 9, 2008 12:40 PM

First off, A lot of retired players hold out on signing their retirement papers, so Favre is not unusual there.

Secondly, it's wide-held that Thompson has a large ego and did nothing to encourage his record holding, three-time MVP quarterback to return because Thompson wants to build his own legacy. I think Favre wanted to come back, but he was pushed by Thompson not to.

Third, the only way to go out on top in the NFL is with a SB ring.

Fourth, I love Brett Favre. I would never guess in a million years that the Packers wouldn't want him back. But I can see why they don't, I mean, after all the talk about Aaron Rodgers being the man, they'd look pretty stupid to renig on a Favre rumor.

Fifth, am I the only one who watched the December Bears game and the NFC championship? Favre looked old and cold. But, in the Seattle Playoff game he looked like a 21-year-old. So if he does play, lets hope there's no below-zero weather.

Finally, Yeah, fans have moved on in a sense. We're all Packer fans first and Favre fans second. But I'm pretty sure we'd have Thompson's head on a platter if Favre rolled into Lambeau come season opener wearing a Vikqueen uniform. If a trade happens, Favre probably won't got to anyone in the North. Maybe he'll end up in Atlanta. Seems fitting.

(Side Note to Browntollio: What talented young receivers are you talking about? Robert Ferguson?)

Posted by: Packfan4 | July 9, 2008 3:05 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company