Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Happy Hour Roundup -- and Welcome!

* Note to readers: Newcomers, welcome to my blog, The Plum Line. Regulars, if you've just landed here, it's because you've been redirected from the old digs.

This is a blog of reported opinion. It's mostly about the Democratic Party, the media old and new, the netroots, and the state of liberalism in the Age of Obama. But it's really just about politics.

The premise of this blog is that you can care about what happens in politics -- you can be predisposed towards one outcome rather than another -- while still doing journalism that's accurate, fair, professional and has integrity. Many people disagree with that, but so be it. This blog is going to keep trying to prove it can be done.

The most important thing about The Plum Line is the readership. I read and respond to comments constantly and find commenters to be my best sources. So please participate as much as you can bear to.

I'm thrilled to have the opportunity to do this kind of opinionated reporting in a blogospheric idiom from such a storied platform, and I'm grateful to WaPo for giving it a try. I also feel enormous gratitude to editor Rachel Van Dongen, who provided this blog a home until now, and I'll continue linking to that site, a Wikipedia of the political world that's packed with illuminating, entertaining profiles.

Each weekday morning we'll begin with something called "The Morning Plum," which is (hopefully) a punchy and user-friendly roundup of news and opinion, with many more links from the blogosphere than you'll find in other morning roundups. Each day will end with something called a "Happy Hour Roundup," which will generally look like the one below. So let's get on with it already!


Happy Hour roundup:

* Surprise, surprise: The FBI says that the Times Square bomb suspect kept talking after being Mirandized:

Shahzad was initially questioned under a public safety exception to the Miranda rule and was cooperative, FBI Deputy Director John Pistole said at the news conference. He said Shahzad was later read his Miranda rights and "continued talking."

* And: At his presser today, Eric Holder added that the information gleaned was "useful."

* But: Marco Rubio questions whether the suspect should have been Mirandized: "It all depends on how they are going to try him." Maybe Rubio doesn't know that this guy is a U.S. citizen and must be tried in civilian courts?

* Good for Harry Reid for saying that the Gulf oil spill should spur action on energy reform.

* Gallup finds more Americans are concerned about border control than about dealing with the illegal immigrants who are already here, but not by much.

* Here's one underappreciated reason Dems could still hang onto the House, unlike in 1994: This time around, Dem leaders are, you know, competent.

* Ken Vogel boils down the GOP dilemma: Just about everything the Republican base believes is "at odds with the majority of voters."

* Adam Serwer divines some darker motives behind the GOP criticism of the decision to Mirandize the Times Square suspect.

* Yglesias says that even if Obama wanted to seize on the Gulf spill to move energy reform, that wouldn't change the fact that a handful of Senators still hold the fate of the earth in the palms of their hands.

* Interesting: Senate Republicans are now swatting away the 'Cuda, saying they aren't into the phrase "drill, baby, drill."

* And Robert Gibbs asks Fox News to stop makin' it up.

What else is happening?

Update: Apologies, all, the comments section appears to be broken. I'll try to get it fixed as quickly as possible. Thanks for your patience...

By Greg Sargent  |  May 4, 2010; 6:45 PM ET
Categories:  Foreign policy and national security , Senate Dems , Senate Republicans  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: GOP Rep: Rubio should be "ashamed" for not backing Arizona law
Next: The Morning Plum


Well, this is certainly auspicious. Do I have the honor or submitting the very first comment?

Posted by: curmudgeon6 | May 5, 2010 1:06 PM | Report abuse

And now that we've established that the coments are in good working order, a question: I'm assuming your column is an adjunct or a corresponding column to the WaPo's recent addition of the Dave Weigel column for the Conservs, n'est-ce pas? Dave covering the Right, you the Left?

How about laying out a few of your general philosophies? How do you stand on polling? (I think there's entirely too much of it, and a lot of it is basically pointless and space-filling.) Glenn Beck: spawn of the devil or merely psychopathic? Is bartering chickens in exchange for a prostate exam a viable notion or a leftover 1960's drug flashback? Ann Coulter: spawnatrix of the devil, or merely psychopathic?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Posted by: curmudgeon6 | May 5, 2010 1:20 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company