Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 5:30 AM ET, 11/18/2010

Obama, symbol and reality

By Jeffrey C. Alexander
Guest Blogger

About this blog: Is electoral success based only on demographics, strategy and money? Jeffrey C. Alexander begs to differ, and he offers a new way of looking at the process of attaining and keeping political power in “The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power,” released this week by Oxford University Press. Alexander, a professor of sociology at Yale, focuses on powerful subtle and not-so-subtle messages a candidate conveys through emotion, images and performance to achieve cultural meaning and symbolic importance. Here, Alexander traces these issues through the 2008 presidential campaign and ruminates on the limits of heroic symbolism in politics.


In contemporary discussions about how people vote and which candidate succeeds there is a marked tendency to demographic determinism. In “The Performance of Power,” I take the explanation of politics in a very different direction, into the realm of culture.
Rhetoric, tone, and tempo are critical to the political actor. So is the script, and let’s not forget the power to procure a stage, which today means getting covered by the media. But even if you have all of these, nobody can predict how audiences will react. Another thing: every message is mediated and interpreted by journalists along the way.

It is paradoxical that, to be a successful performer, a political candidate must appear not be performing. Her action and speech must be seen as authentic, not as constructed but as a natural and sincere. The worst thing the media can say is that a candidate seems wooden, artificial, contrived, a puppet on a string pulled by invisible others, the people who actually are directing one’s action and writing one’s script.

For politicians to symbolize effectively, they must become heroes. You become a hero by offering the promise of salvation. The rhetoric of struggles for big time political power is filled with cries about the utter disaster of our times. Apocalypse looms. If my opponent gets into power, disaster looms. Only if you elect me will the world be saved.

In 2008, John McCain and Barack Obama narrated the crisis of our times in fatefully different ways. According tor Obama, we were in the midst of a great and terrible domestic crisis: growing inequality and intolerance, rampant corruption, secret government and the curtailment of civil liberties, precious resources squandered on war. For McCain, the crisis was outside civil society, not inside it. It was about the enemy at our gates. “The great battle of the 21rst century is the struggle against Islamic extremism,” McCain often declared. We must suck it up and be strong. The Republican’s mantra was “fight, fight, fight.”

The struggle for power in 2008 was not a good time for military heroes. There was a giant public turn off to the Iraq war. One poll claimed that 65 percent of Americans said they were “bored” with the issue, and few felt terrorism to be an imminent danger. There was a growing sense of domestic unease, worry that growing inequality posed a danger to civil society, that Katrina exposed government rot, indifference, and gnawing fear of slow motion economic decline.

Against this background, there were three “plot points” that actually determined the outcome of the campaign: Celebrity Metaphor, Palin Effect, and Financial Crisis.

Worried about his foreign policy credentials, in July, 2008, Obama interrupted his domestic campaign with an unprecedented trip to the Middle East and Europe. It was a risky move, but as it unfolded it was widely perceived as an extraordinary success. But performative politics are tricky.

Every hero has a shadow. The more he becomes a hero, the more he exposes himself to charges of hubris. The brilliant performance artist in charge of the Republican campaign, a k a Steven Schmidt, created a web advertisement declaring Obama a “celebrity” -- an arrogant, arugula eating, health-food intaking, Ivy League educated, holier than thou, flying-too- close-to-the-sun, better than your average Joe celebrity. The ad went viral and the metaphor spread like wild fire, with many son-of-celebrity-ads in its wake. In the run-up to the Democratic convention, Republicans claimed that the platform being erected for Obama’s acceptance speech copied Greek temples for the gods. Obama’s August 31st speech, and the extraordinary Americana surrounding it, belied Republican hopes and allayed Democratic fears.

At that very moment, however, Sarah Palin burst on the scene. She became a sensational overnight star. Touted as a hero of Alaskan civil society and a fearless domestic reformer, Palin performed the role of a god-fearing, gun-toting, post-feminist Annie Oakley. The Palin symbol came from the heartland of America’s frontier myth. Three weeks of hide and seek, rhetorical gaffs, public ridicule, and media exposure later, buyers’ remorse set in. The hero symbol deflated and the Palin Effect fizzled.

The Financial Crisis exploded on the public stage on September 14th . Not the real economic crisis but the symbol encasing it directed this final act of the 2008 struggle for power.

McCain, the former navy pilot, was supposed to be cool under fire, but he seemed irrational, suggesting “the fundamentals of our economy are good.” He also appeared impulsive, suspending his campaign to parachute into Washington, making things worse, then calling the campaign back on again. Meanwhile, Citizen Obama remained conspicuously cool, calm, and collected. The contrast in these performances assured Obama’s cultural victory. For the first time the Democrat took a statistically significant lead.

He never looked back. The performance of politics closed its long run on election day, but the results were determined by the end of the first week in October, a month before voting. Began.

How could Obama have done such an extraordinary job of “performing politics” during his campaign for the presidency, and be in such a disastrous position two years after winning it? For conservatives, the answer is simple. As one colleague put it: “The public now sees who Obama really was all the time!” But this partisan response is too easy. It takes reality for granted, as if it isn’t performatively enacted, as if facts and events can be considered outside a cultural frame. My answer is different: Obama seems to have lost his ability to symbolize, not only for the right side of the citizen-audience, but for the center and even for those sitting on stage left. But that is another story which must wait for another day.

By Jeffrey C. Alexander  | November 18, 2010; 5:30 AM ET
Categories:  Guest Blogger  | Tags:  obama hero symbolism; obama image; image in politics; 2008 campaign  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: 2010 National Book Award winners announced
Next: Why democracies despise themselves


It's painfully obvious that you, much like our current president and most previous ones, do not understand leadership nor have you ever been forced to hold a leadership position.

Real leadership has nothing to do with 'actors' or 'acting.' Real leaders understand their environment, their people, the problems they're facing, the elements of their surroundings, their strengths and limitations, and combine all of them to tell the truth and *L*E*A*D*!!!!!

It isn't smoke and mirrors; it isn't performance. It's real.

Do you know what 'real' looks like? Nope. But you do think you know what great performance looks like.

Congrats! You've descended into the world of unreality. You've been fooled by fools into believing their game.

Posted by: No_Yes | November 18, 2010 4:59 PM | Report abuse

very good article--What is not written is the unspoken word--racism--When Obama won I saw right off just by the states that the country was divided by the states won by both candidates--The country was split down the middle-It was like a line was drawn right thru the middle of our country--This had never been discussed on any blog Ive seen in the last 2 years-There is apathy that is untapped and poorly reported on-The young and the old just dont have any trust-The GOP are plainly just slapping everyone in the face and no one is doing much about it--The Democrats are just getting rich and showing no balls whatsoever-Hence the Tea-Party-Wow! A bunch of Idiots that even got elected and many more almost did--I have a very bad fealling that the GOP will do more than just say "NO" this time-I think we are in for a very very bad 2 years! I think Obama has very good intentsions-I just dont think He will be able to get it done and the GOP will truly screw things up and most people just wont see it--For those of you who think Obama is a socialist why dont you read about one of our greatest presidents--FDR--He will look like Karl Marx next to Obama! I hope Obama just says screw you GOP and just kick some but and get our economy going now! He still has power he hasnt even tapped on!--Bring back the tax on the 3% of the Rich to start!--Fix the Foreclosure market by giving new loans from the government to homeowners only-(FDR did)-not investors and Fivally really go after the Banks-they are plainly just stealing money from all of us!

Posted by: spc7ray | November 19, 2010 10:10 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company