Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 11:00 AM ET, 02/ 8/2011

Why are today’s rebels Republicans?

By Grace Elizabeth Hale
Guest Blogger

outsiders.jpg

About this blog: We used to think of rebels as liberals: student activists of the 1960s, hippies, Dylan, Springsteen. These were the outsiders – the rebels and radicals –who identified our nation’s ills and sought to change the system. Often they were middle-class white Americans who saw a romance in rebellion and ultimately changed the culture. Now, those standing against the status quo have a decidedly different outlook: they are conservatives, fundamentalists, Tea Partiers. How did this shift come about? Why are today’s rebels Republicans? Grace Elizabeth Hale explores the nature of the outsider in American culture in her book “A Nation of Outsiders: How the White Middle Class Fell in Love with Rebellion in Postwar America,” recently released by Oxford University Press. Here, Hale, an associate professor of history and American studies at the University of Virginia, delves into the impulses that drive both conservative and liberal rebels.

***************************

Not so long ago, rebels and radicals were reliably liberal. They were left activists and politicians like Tom Hayden, Ralph Nader and Bernie Sanders; popular icons of resistance like Bob Dylan or Pete Seeger or Bruce Springsteen; or maverick fictional characters like Holden Caulfield or Sal Paradise.

But today, arch conservative Sarah Palin proudly plays the rogue, Tea Party members declare themselves rebels, and bloggers like “Main Street Radical” and “Left Coast Rebel” write for the right. When did the rebel become a Republican?

In fact, politically conservative rebels are nothing new. Many revolutionary era patriots and Civil War rebels fought for conservative visions of property rights. In the last 50 years, rebels on the left championed social justice and freedom of expression, garnering media attention and positive reviews in the New York Times. Meanwhile, right-wing rebels from William F. Buckley to the Jesus People have been laying the ground for today’s Tea Party members.

No single figure did more to create the role of rebel on the right than Buckley, whose journal National Review and television program Firing Line popularized rebellious conservatism. Rich, Catholic, and white, Buckley’s political conservatism made him an outsider in the rich, white, Christian world of the Ivy League.

His first book, “God and Man at Yale,” attacked his alma mater as a hotbed of socialism and atheism—a vision that resonated with college students who had come of age reading Ayn Rand’s libertarian novels “The Fountainhead” and “Atlas Shrugged.” Overshadowed by rebels on the left in later years, these conservative activists continued to spread Buckley’s vision of a radical revolution against the liberal center.

In the late 1960s and the 1970s, the counterculture fused with conservative Christianity to generate a new version of the conservative-as-rebel. While many hippies explored eastern religious practices like yoga, meditation and American Indian rituals such as sweat lodges and vision quests, others challenged the mainline Protestantism and Reform Judaism that dominated American religious life.

Members of the Jesus People movement sought self-fulfillment in ostensibly earlier and “purer” forms of Christianity. “Jesus Freaks” learned to “dig” Christ at Christian rock festivals, where they were baptized in their bikinis or surfing trunks at beachside ceremonies. Christian rebels kept their casual clothes, rock music, and easy emotional intimacy even as they adopted a very conservative, Jesus-centered theology. The churches they established eventually became some of the first mega-churches that today dominate suburban American religious life.

In the last quarter of the 20th century, many conservative Christians rebelled against what they understood as liberal politics—policies that banned prayer in schools, established equal rights for women and gays, and legalized abortion.

The most important anti-abortion activist of the period, Randall Terry, who wanted to be a rock star, left home in search of the counterculture and discovered Christian fundamentalism instead. In the late 1980s, his organization Operation Rescue drew thousands of believers into nonviolent mass protests against abortion in what conservatives called the new civil rights movement.

These members of the New Right, like some members of the New Left before them, understood their opposition to the American political practices of their time in deeply moral and spiritual terms.

Contrary to popular opinion, the rebel has always been politically promiscuous. The rebel is not a set of political or intellectual or spiritual beliefs. It is a character or role characterized by opposition to whatever appears to be central in a particular time and place. Seemingly outside the history they actually live within, rebels claim a powerful innocence.

Across the last half century, this sense of alienation has proven remarkably productive in both politics and popular culture. Sarah Palin and her Tea Party supporters are simply the latest in a long line of Americans who draw power from their sense that they are outsiders.

By Grace Elizabeth Hale  | February 8, 2011; 11:00 AM ET
Categories:  Guest Blogger  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: BOOK WORLD - February 6, 2011
Next: Trove of McKinley's books donated to library

Comments

Enough with the terms rouge and rebel, it's political posturing. These folks are so mainstream America, it's laughable.

Posted by: jckdoors | February 8, 2011 2:44 PM | Report abuse

one of the greatest "rebels" today -- not mentioned by Prof. Hale but no doubt on her mind -- is Glenn Beck. Rush and O'Reilly rail against the status quo, but when Glenn says "it's time to take back America" or "it's time to take back our government," Republican outsiders listen. Of course, when Beck and Sarah and others talk about 'taking it back,' one naturally has to ask: Take it back from whom? And who took it away to begin with?

Posted by: paraitaly | February 9, 2011 8:23 AM | Report abuse

When I joined the Goldwater movement in the early 1960s, we faced a phalanxe of labor unions, academia, broadcast media, metropolitan media and sundry minority groups. We were ridiculed. My college newspapers called us "The Young Aryan Supremists." They said we'd never, ever amass much political influence and the Election of 1964 seemed to prove them right.
We were the outsiders. We were the rebels. We laced up our shoes, pulled up our socks and rolled up our sleeves and strained to make our scruffy little "movement" the strongest force in American politics. We lose elections once in a while. We get our butts kicked often enough to suppress complacency but we hold the high ground. The people are overwhelmingly with us.

Posted by: dogmother | February 12, 2011 5:08 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company