
Special Classifieds Feature
Buy Washington Post Inauguration newspapers, books, and more






2:20 p.m. ET: A deal on bailout legislation is at hand on Capitol Hill -- sort of. Key members of the House and Senate spoke not long ago to say that they had reached what Chris Dodd called a "fundamental agreement" on a package. But pockets of resistance remain, particularly within the GOP. John Boehner made a point earlier of saying that there is no "deal," as far as he is concerned, until he can take the plan to his fellow House Republicans for review.
It may well turn out that House Republicans will be the only significant bloc not to vote for this measure, even if John McCain supports it. Speaking of the GOP nominee, he's on the Hill now, but is he actually playing any role in the talks? Barney Frank previewed the coming Democratic spin today by gently mocking the idea that everyone will be trooping over to the White House (McCain's idea) to break the deadlock, when "there's really not much of a deadlock to break."
Still no definitive word on Friday's debate, though Haley Barbour did say today that he still expects the debate to happen. And if it does happen, we now know where Sarah Palin will be: At an Irish pub in Philadelphia (literally, the place is called Irish Pub). Remember, Bar + Debate = Drinking Games. Perhaps Palin will do a shot every time someone says "change" or "leadership" during the debate.
Beyond the oxygen-sucking stories of the bailout and the presidential race, Ted Stevens is on trial today at the D.C. federal courthouse. What does it mean when a titan of the Senate is on trial for alleged corruption, and it gets almost no attention?
11:15 a.m. ET: The bees are busy on Capitol Hill this morning, working to hammer out a final deal on bailout legislation. Given the pace of the talks, it seems possible that there will be a rough consensus on a deal by the time the Bush-Obama-McCain-leadership gathering happens at the White House this afternoon. Hill Republicans will be watching closely to see whether McCain backs whatever deal emerges, as his support would give them more cover to vote for it.
McCain spoke this morning at the Clinton Global Initiative, and said: "It has become clear that no consensus has developed to support the Administration's proposal to meet the crisis. I do not believe that the plan on the table will pass as it currently stands, and we are running out of time." Of course, the plan he's referring to -- the one first proposed by Hank Paulson -- is no longer on the table and hasn't been for a few days. Some Democrats suspect McCain is deliberately downplaying the progress on the Hill so far to further the storyline that he is coming to town to save the day, while Republicans emphasize that there really is no deal yet.
The fate of the Ole Miss debate remains in flux, as does the congressional schedule. If the bailout vote ends up being scheduled in the Senate for Saturday or Sunday, does that give McCain his final excuse to skip the debate? And will that explanation work with the public?
On the undercard, Joe Biden is campaigning at a pair of stops in Pennsylvania today, as his tough-on-McCain speech on foreign policy yesterday in Ohio got far less attention than it would have on a normal news day.
Speaking of the VP candidates, McCain's campaign has reportedly suggested that Friday night's debate be postponed until Oct. 2, the night that Biden and Sarah Palin are supposed to square off, so their debate would be postponed as well to an unspecified later date. Pure speculation here: Might these cascading delays result in no VP debate at all? Which side would benefit from that? Watch last night's video of Katie Couric's interview with Palin, and decide for yourself.
8 a.m. ET: The two dominant stories of the week -- the economic bailout and the presidential campaign -- collide at the White House this afternoon in an unusual summit meeting between President Bush, Hill leaders, Barack Obama, John McCain and Mikhail Gorbachev (just checking to see if you're awake). Questions abound: Will this be a substantive discussion or a photo-op? What will the seating chart look like? Who will be the first to leak everything afterwards, and do they have The Takeaway's email address?
Bush addressed the nation in prime time last night and reassuringly suggested that "our entire economy is in danger." (Fortunately, the newspaper industry is still doing great!) But before you run out to stock up on canned goods and extra batteries, know that there are indications that a legislative deal on the bailout -- sorry, "rescue effort" -- may come as soon as today.
Real progress toward a compromise today, before McCain even gets the chance to roll up his sleeves and act like he's involved in the talks, may cast more doubt on his "bold -- or bonkers" decision yesterday to suspend his campaign and call for a delay of tomorrow night's debate. (The Takeaway seriously considered suspending his blog today, and calling on all of his competitors to do the same, both for the greater good of the country and so he could get some extra sleep after staying up late to watch baseball. Alas, duty calls.)
Let's say there is a deal on the Hill today. Will McCain still want to skip the debate? The Rebels are nervous down at Ole Miss, where they've spent roughly $5 million prepping for tomorrow night's faceoff. And will McCain's gambit give his campaign any measurable boost after a rough week?
The new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll has Obama up two points, though, like every other recent survey, it gives Obama a big edge on the economy. It's a good thing for McCain that we're not facing the prospect of "a long and painful recession." Oh, wait ...
By
Ben Pershing
|
September 25, 2008; 8:00 AM ET
Go to full archive for The Rundown »
Posted by: afisher | September 25, 2008 8:42 AM
Add this to your list of prominent stories of the week...unfortunatley, the MSM will never report this.
OBAMA & DNC-Hide Behind Legal Issues
While Betraying Public in not Producing a Certified Copy of Obama's "Vault" Birth Certificate and Oath of Allegiance
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 09/24/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of "qualifications" to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss on the last day to file a response, for the obvious purpose of delaying Court action in the case of Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Their joint motion indicates a concerted effort to avoid the truth by delaying the judicial process by not resolving the issue presented: that is, whether Barack Obama was "natural born."
Obama cannot produce a certified copy of his "Vault" [original long version] Birth Certificate from Hawaii because it does not exist.
DNC Chairperson Howard Dean should resign as he has not and is not fulfilling his responsibility of seeing that a "qualified" candidate is on the ballot as the Democratic candidate for President of the United States.
Berg stated that a response will be made in the next few days to their Motion to Dismiss.
Posted by: 07001 | September 25, 2008 9:31 AM
What do *afisher's* comments have to do with the issue? He belongs on the rush limbaugh show, probably IS rush limbaugh, the republican party's best hater.
I don't buy the bailout for republicans and their rich friends....just bush's last attempt to screw the taxpayer. He belongs in prison with the rest of them. And mccain is too stupid to bother with.
Posted by: Cheryl | September 25, 2008 11:34 AM
07001,
A Motion to Dismiss is typically filed early on to get frivolous litigation thrown out of court. Unless you can point to something more than mere speculation, I would wager large sums of money that the motion to dismiss the Berg action was filed because the defendants felt the litigation was frivolous, not to delay adjuducation on the subject matter of the litigation.
Posted by: scott032 | September 25, 2008 12:23 PM
Any day we are talking about McCains itinerary rather than his economic policies, it's a good day for Big John.
It's all a little "through the looking glass" for me, I can't imagine how one parties presidential candidate is going to influence the other parties elected representatives to be LESS partisan. I don't think the Democrats will balk just because McCain is fluttering around the room, the Masters of our Universe have spoken and they require a bail-out from their worshipers, it's just that I don't see how he's going to get credit for it.
If he isn't credited with saving the economy, then rushing to the site of negotiations appears to be a case of hubris overturning common sense
Posted by: dijetlo | September 25, 2008 1:27 PM
Credit? I think everybody who had anything to do with this should hide their face in shame. The fact that needs to be done (if in fact it does need to be done)is shameful. I do think the people behind it should be run out of town at the next election.
Posted by: linda521 | September 25, 2008 3:52 PM
If those fat cats on Wall Street are broke , let them file bankruptcy.
Why could they not find any money for those American who lost their jobs, have poor health care and those who are losing their homes due to foreclosure?
Posted by: jvii | September 25, 2008 6:58 PM
McCain is riding into town to save .... his campaign! Anything to distract from his collapse in the polls. Palin turns out to be even worse than feared, he's becoming more desperate, erratic, impulsive and strange. The idea that he might have his finger on "The Button" is truly frightening.
Bush, McCain. No More Years!!
Posted by: thebob.bob | September 25, 2008 7:27 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.


Please tell R. Cowan and T Ferraro, that Barney Franks is not a Senator, but a Representative from MA.