Special Classifieds Feature

Buy Washington Post Inauguration newspapers, books, and more

RECENT POSTS
READER PICKS
Let us know what you are reading. We'll post Reader Picks throughout the day.
RELATED LINKS
The Rundown

8 a.m. ET: This afternoon, President Obama will meet with one former president and the brother of another. The timing seems appropriate, as Obama's session with Bill Clinton and Edward Kennedy to discuss national service comes as the press prepares to start rolling out its assessments of 44's first 100 days, and comparing his achievements to those of his predecessors.

Is Obama best compared to Franklin Roosevelt? Both men, the Los Angeles Times points out this morning, came into office proposing sweeping legislative changes in response to dire economic crises. "And yet, for all the talk of sweeping change, we have learned this about Obama: He is not really a radical," Doyle McManus writes. "Like FDR, he wants to reform American capitalism in order to save it." Republicans also see some parallels between Obama and Roosevelt -- and dislike both presidencies. Many in the GOP are busy reading the revisionist Depression history, "The Forgotten Man." Depending on whom you ask, it's either "a remarkable book" that corrects long-held misperceptions about the effectiveness of the New Deal, or it's a simplistic, misguided collection of "stories that mostly go nowhere."

One noticeable trend in Obama's first 100 days (actually, 92 so far) is that Obama speaks publicly quite often. Past presidents, Newsweek notes, "have allowed the vice president or other top aides to take on some of the PR workload or have even relied on the magic of the press release to get word out, but not Obama." Tim Geithner and Vice President Biden have given a few speeches, but with the exception of Geithner's missteps, how many have been truly memorable? And when was the last time you saw Hillary Clinton speaking on TV? Jim Hoagland suggested Sunday that Obama should "[s]tay out of the honey-tree trap of commander in chiefism" and instead delegate more to his Cabinet. As next week's milestone approaches, you can expect a lot more analysis of how Obama's much-chronicled decision to assemble a "team of rivals" (and big egos) has worked in practice.

Speaking of previous administrations, on the same day that Obama addressed CIA employees to thank them for their work, the debate over the agency's interrogation policies raged on Monday. Rather than complain, as some conservatives have, that any memos were released at all, Dick Cheney has now called for more documents to be made public. Specifically, Cheney told Sean Hannity, he has "formally asked the CIA to take steps to declassify" memos "that lay out what we learned through the interrogation process and what the consequences were for the country.” He argues that the public might view harsh interrogation policies differently if it saw evidence the country was made safer as a result.

Over at RedState, Moe Lane says that the voting public doesn't particularly care about these interrogation tactics as long as the country is kept safe. Is that true? It's too early to gauge public reaction to the memos' release. But remember: Back in February, a USA Today/Gallup poll found that a combined 62 percent of respondents wanted either a criminal investigation or an independent panel to probe the "possible use of torture" by the Bush administration. Only 34 percent wanted neither.

By Ben Pershing  |  April 21, 2009; 8:00 AM ET
Go to full archive for The Rundown »

COMMENTS

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Obama's session with Bill Clinton and Edward Kennedy to discuss national service leaves much to be desired. Clinton spent much of his presidency defending himself against some very harsh charges, in fact almost all of his second term while Kennedy will never be accepted by many because of his shameless performance regarding Kopeckni in running home to seek help in explaining that accident before reporting it. I guess it another example of Obama and the company he keeps. sad sad sad...

Posted by: rvallone | April 21, 2009 10:21 AM

'NATIONAL SERVICE' IS A SLIPPERY SLOPE WHEN THE (ONGOING) BUSH-ERA 'EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT NETWORK' APPEARS TO USE FEDERALLY-FUNDED VOLUNTEER PROGRAMS AS A FRONT FOR AN AMERICAN GESTAPO.


Mr. President, c/o White House staff (Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, Jay Carney)


Please read this before POTUS finalizes his national service agenda:


http://nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded-vigilante-network-terrorizes-america

OR (if link is corrupted / disabled):

http://NowPublic.com/scrivener


Posted by: scrivener50 | April 21, 2009 11:31 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company