Special Classifieds Feature

Buy Washington Post Inauguration newspapers, books, and more

RECENT POSTS
READER PICKS
Let us know what you are reading. We'll post Reader Picks throughout the day.
RELATED LINKS
The Rundown

8 a.m. ET: Is Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation to the Supreme Court a foregone conclusion? Consider:

• She is a known quantity. Sotomayor has been seen as a potential court pick for months, giving friends and foes alike ample time to pore over her record. The proliferation of blogs and the wealth of information available online, including all of her legal opinions, mean that on some level Sotomayor has already been vetted (though her body of work includes "no major decisions concerning abortion, the death penalty, gay rights or national security.") Critics have seized on a few of her past remarks, but if there is a true smoking gun anywhere in her professional record, it hasn't been found. Her personal life is a different story, but we can only assume that Team Obama knows for sure that she has paid all her taxes. Can't we?

• The fact that Sotomayor -- or, as Mike Huckabee called her, "Maria" -- is Latina presents the GOP with a special set of problems. Republicans can certainly criticize her record and judicial philosophy, but may be hesitant to adopt the kind of scorched-Earth tactics that have been deployed in some past Supreme Court fights. Doing so could represent a "suicide mission" for the party.

• Mathematically, Democrats have a near-stranglehold on the Senate. With 59 seats -- 60 if and when Al Franken is seated -- the majority barely needs to reach across the aisle in order to accrue the support necessary to put Sotomayor on the court. Centrist Democrats have so far given no indication that they would oppose her nomination, and some key Republicans, particularly Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, are already sounding positive notes about Sotomayor.

With Sotomayor's confirmation very likely, The Fix suggests that the real aim for the GOP will be to use the pick as a way to paint Obama as a liberal partisan. Will that tactic work? Sotomayor is being described this morning as the most controversial of Obama's four finalists for the seat, and yet in the broader scheme of things she probably isn't the boldest or most liberal choice Obama could have made. Stephen Carter calls her "a thoughtful moderate, with liberal leanings, to be sure, but hardly a firebrand on a mission."

So, barring a bombshell, Sotomayor looks to be on a glide path to the highest court. What, then, is the value for either side to elevate this into a more dramatic fight than it really is? Think of this as a dress rehearsal. What if the next justice to leave is a conservative, and Obama actually has the fundamental chance to alter the court's ideological makeup? Or what if Obama's next nominee really is a "firebrand on a mission"? It's useful, for both the Right and Left, to stretch their muscles and learn how this Senate and this president handle a Supreme Court nomination. Because the next battle might be a real one.

By Ben Pershing  |  May 27, 2009; 8:00 AM ET
Go to full archive for The Rundown » Go to full archive for The Rundown »

COMMENTS

Please email us to report offensive comments.



THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY IS WELL AWARE OF THE EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT NETWORK SPAWNED OR EXPANDED UNDER BUSH-CHENEY..

...A POLICE STATE APPARATUS THAT CONTINUES UNDER OBAMA.

WHAT GOOD IS AN ENLIGHTENED SCOTUS NOMINEE IF A PARALLEL SYSTEM OF VIGILANTE INJUSTICE IS COVERTLY PROMOTED AND FUNDED BY FEDERAL SECURITY/MILITARY/INTEL AGENCIES...

...WHO HAVE CO-OPTED LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT NATIONWIDE TO CREATE A COVERT AMERICAN GESTAPO...

...THAT IMPLANTS GPS TRACKING DEVICES ON THE VEHICLES OF INNOCENT BUT "TARGETED" U.S. CITIZENS AND THEIR FAMILIES... AND USES MICROWAVE RADIATION "DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS" TO DEGRADE THEIR MINDS AND BODIES.


While the media is distracted by the "stories of the day," democracy is being stolen at the grassroots -- and the domestic TORTURE and gradual financial expropriation of the "unjustly targeted" continues unabated under an apparently "unaware" Team Obama.

Please read this:

http://nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded-vigilante-network-terrorizes-america

OR (if link is corrupted / disabled):

http://NowPublic.com/scrivener

Posted by: scrivener50 | May 27, 2009 10:23 AM

Why is Al Franken not at work in Washington? Is somebody getting a pass by the press?

Posted by: llnstoner | May 27, 2009 11:04 AM

If opposing this nominee is political suicide, then so be it. She is an awful, awful choice for this position and, if seated, can wreak havoc upon our freedoms for decades. She believes in international law but not in the Bill of Rights.

From all of President Obama's decisions over the past few months, not just this appointment, I cannot help but feel he is engineering the downfall of this nation, or at least stripping it of the very freedoms that made it great. A KGB plant in the President's office could think of more ways to harm this country.

Posted by: RealTexan1 | May 27, 2009 2:32 PM

Sotomayor has spent her entire career on the bench of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals pushing an activist agenda. She has made public statements promoting selective racism against white males and proclaiming that the Court of Appeals is where policy is made (not the Legislative Branch as dictated in the Constitution).

This woman is, as her sponsor Obama, a clear and present danger to the freedoms and liberty enjoyed by We the People. She has proven that her oath of office is a mere inconvenience to her true purpose of legislating from the bench. Rather than rewarding her with a Supreme Court robe, she should be impeached and removed from the bench and, possibly, prosecuted for the deliberate violation of her oath of office.

Posted by: ehampson | May 27, 2009 3:51 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company