Special Classifieds Feature

Buy Washington Post Inauguration newspapers, books, and more

RECENT POSTS
READER PICKS
Let us know what you are reading. We'll post Reader Picks throughout the day.
RELATED LINKS
The Rundown

8 a.m. ET: Everyone loves a good comeback story.

The public insurance option, the inclusion of which in a final reform plan appeared highly unlikely a month ago, now looks like a decent bet to pass in some form. The House is certain to include a version of the public option in its bill, while in the Senate, the Washington Post writes, Harry Reid "was increasingly leaning toward the idea of including a version of a public insurance option, albeit one that would allow states to opt out of such a system, in the chamber's bill." In a blog post titled, "Public Option: It's Back."Jonathan Karl reports, "Reid is now convinced that Democratic critics of the public option will support him when it counts – on the procedural motion, which requires 60 votes, to defeat a certain GOP-led filibuster of the bill."

The public option may be back from the dead, but it's still in intensive care. The move to include the provision may cost Reid the support of Olympia Snowe, who emphasized in an interview with Al Hunt that she remains opposed to including the public plan and that the reform bill could slip into 2010. "“Christmas might be too soon,” she said. “We should give it the time it deserves.” The Hill has several other senators predicting the "reform debate will be pushed deep into December and possibly beyond." The New York Times calls Reid's decision "a calculated gamble" that "was shaped, in part, by opinion polls showing public support for a government insurance plan." Despite the debate over the phrasing of poll questions, nearly every survey of the question has shown majority support for the public option, but support in polls doesn't necessarily translate to 60 votes in the Senate.

The sailing in the House isn't completely smooth either, as Politico reports: "Nancy Pelosi counted votes Thursday night and determined she could not pass a “robust public option.” ... Pelosi's decision — coupled with a significant turn of events yesterday during a private White House meeting — points to an increasingly likely compromise for a trigger option for a government plan." (The story adds that President Obama "favored the trigger option" put forth by Snowe.) The Hill adds (in a story posted 12 hours before Politico's "exclusive" report) that the "survey ordered by Pelosi turned up 46 Democrats who said they would vote against the so-called 'robust' public option, according to a Democratic lawmaker who spoke on the condition of anonymity." And Roll Call writes, "Three dozen moderate Democrats are warning [Pelosi and Steny Hoyer] that they must show that their health care bill will cut long-term costs or they will vote it down."

Amid all the back-and-forth, Jonathan Cohn sums up the situation this way: "At least for the moment, the debate isn't over whether to include a public option. It's over what kind." Confused about the various compromise proposals? Ezra Klein offers a concise guide to the menu of options. Nate Silver provides an analysis, complete with a (complicated) chart, of how the various plans would be implemented and how they would operate once in place.

By Ben Pershing  |  October 23, 2009; 8:00 AM ET
Go to full archive for The Rundown » Go to full archive for The Rundown »

COMMENTS

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Very nice revision of history there, sport.

The support for a public option has always been strong- among the public.

What has changed is that efforts to dismiss the public option as dead in the water have failed. That dog wouldn't hunt, as they used to say.

So your "comeback" story only makes sense in whatever passes for reality in Washington.

Posted by: pooleside | October 23, 2009 9:18 AM

Albeit States can opt out.

What are the reasons for opting out?
The ability to opt out could possibly defeat the whole purpose of having the option. Some States will claim poor and call for help from US Govt in addition and anyway.
Triggers for Insurance are essential as well as for States who don't comply with the intentions of Congress!!!!

Posted by: kidvid | October 23, 2009 9:30 AM

THIS Is the "Public Option" Already in Force By Extremists Within Federal Agencies and Commands:

COVERT USE OF MICROWAVE/LASER RADIATION 'DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS' ON U.S. CITIZENS...

...WHEN WILL TEAM OBAMA TAKE DOWN THE BUSH-CHENEY GESTAPO?

Thousands of unjustly targeted Americans are being damaged by the devastating physiological effects of being silently irradiated by microwave and laser radiation "directed energy weapons"...

...the weaponization of the electromagnetic spectrum, a silent "final solution" that may have the nation's political leadership in its ideological cross-hairs.

This technology is capable of altering moods, emotions, inducing fatigue, weakness, exhaustion, confusion, life-altering injury, disease and a slow-kill death.

And key elements of the Obama administration -- chief among them the defense/security/intel establishment -- are proliferating these technologies by various modalities, reported to include terrestrial and satellite electromagnetic microwave/laser emissions -- in one iteration, disguised as cell towers.

American citizens and families targeted by this covert torture matrix also are subject to financial sabotage that decimates their livelihoods and financial resources...

...and relentless "community stalking" -- harassment, surreptitious home entries and vandalism by government-enabled vigilantes affiliated with federally-funded community policing and anti-terrorism organizations.

Warrantless, covert placement of GPS tracking devices and misuse of cell phone technology to hunt down the unjustly targeted enables this grassroots terrorism.

But the Obama administration continues to allow these warrantless intrusions into the lives of unjustly targeted American families.

By its naivete -- its unquestioning rubber-stamp approval of the deployment of these destructive technologies and programs -- the Obama administration risks presiding over the destruction of democracy, the rule of law, and personal liberty.

PRESIDENT OBAMA, CONGRESS:

BAN the use of microwave/laser directed energy weapons on U.S. citizens or any human being as cruel and unusual and a crime against humanity.

BAN the warrantless tracking of individuals with GPS devices on cellphones -- the electronic backbone of an American Gestapo now operating on YOUR watch.

The bureaucratic saboteurs and Dr. Strangeloves behind these multi-agency crimes against humanity and the Constitution must be removed from power, immediately, before this silent genocide claims more victims -- endangering the Obama presidency while making a mockery of the rule of law.

http://nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded-vigilante-network-terrorizes-america

OR (if link is corrupted/disabled):

http://NowPublic.com/scrivener RE: "GESTAPO USA"

Posted by: scrivener50 | October 23, 2009 9:40 AM

Opting out will give "yellow dog" democrats from Louisiana & old Ben Nelson the cover to let the red states like South Carolina, Texas, etc have the chance to allow their uninsured citizen to continue uninsured. It's a pretty good ploy.Dems can say that no one was forced to join the feds insurance & if it works, the republicans can take the heat from their red states.It's a good diversion if you aren't uninsured.The red states like the so-called "states rights" so let'em have it.It will work. The question is: how is it paid for? That's where the heavy lifting starts.

Posted by: tlrasnic | October 24, 2009 9:14 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company