Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity





Dueling trade stats: Chamber of Commerce vs. Trade Watch

chintrade.jpg

(Photo Credit: Sean Yong/Reuters)

By Howard Schneider
Governments may fight trade wars, but it is left to advocacy groups to fight wars over trade statistics.

The latest salvo came Wednesday when Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch released a study that it said proved that the free trade agreements the United States has signed with 17 nations have done little to help America's trade position. U.S. exports to those countries, the group contends, have grown slower than exports to non-FTA countries, and the United States stills runs a trade deficit with them.

"There are many ways to boost U.S. exports and create American jobs, but the data show that more of the same trade deals is not one of them," Trade Watch director Lori Wallach said in a statement.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce quickly fired back. The Trade Watch study was in part a response to data the chamber has touted showing that the United States runs a surplus in manufactured goods with its 17 FTA partners. The business group took aim at the methodology of the new report, which left the two groups in a typically arcane dispute over how to account for goods brought into the United States and then re-exported.

The broader issue is the battle brewing over the Obama administration's trade and export policy - a fight likely to be felt in the midterm elections. You'll find no one on either side who disagrees with the administration's goal of doubling exports in five years, and there's little dispute that the resurgence of the trade deficit is a concern.

But what to do about it? The chamber, of course, favors more free trade agreements as part of an export drive; the Trade Watch folks consider them a bad deal.

By Howard Schneider  | September 15, 2010; 4:38 PM ET
Categories:  Trade  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Industrial growth slowed in August
Next: Economic agenda: Thursday, Sept. 16, 2010

Comments

Dismanteling the manufacturing sector was begun back in the early 90's without public debate.I don't think most Americans would have gone for the idea of the financial sector being the only game in town. Now that they have taken everyone to the cleaners we can look forward to jobs that pay to $2 a day just like China and India!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 21, 2010 12:55 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company