Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Obama's tax plan for business: Will companies start spending?


President Obama at the annual Milwaukee Area Labor Council Laborfest on Monday.

(Photo Credit: AP Photo/Morry Gash)

The White House is rolling out a plan that's the strongest attempt yet to jump-start the economy through policies aimed at business.

Under the plan, businesses would write off 100 percent of their new investment expenses through 2011. Businesses now deduct these expenses over years.The Obama administration would let them deduct immediately.

The puzzle that no one has been able to solve yet is how to get companies to spend, rather than hoard their cash. Would this plan do it?

As Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw points out, the deduction idea is like "giving firms a zero-interest loan if they invest in equipment." But, he adds, because interest rates are already near zero, the value of the tax change isn't much better than what firms can already get.

A story from Bloomberg last week explained that companies are borrowing at extremely low rates.

Johnson & Johnson sold $1.1 billion of bonds at the lowest interest rates on record for 10- and 30-year corporate securities on Aug. 12, according to Citigroup Inc. data going back to 1981. The New Brunswick, N.J.-based drugmaker issued $550 million of 2.95 percent notes due 2020 and the same amount of 4.5 percent bonds maturing 2040, data compiled by Bloomberg show.
International Business Machines Corp., the world's biggest computer-services company, raised $1.5 billion in the bond market on Aug. 2. The 1 percent rate for the three-year notes paid by the Armonk, N.Y.-based company was the lowest of the more than 3,400 securities in the Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate Index of investment-grade company debt.

The other looming question here is how the administration hopes to pay for this deduction, along with a permanent extension of the research and development tax credit. It could come from the pockets of business, based on this nugget from The Post's story Monday by my colleagues Anne Kornblut and Lori Montgomery, who write: "It would be paid for by closing other corporate tax loopholes, said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the policy has not yet been unveiled."

I'm trying to read political code here, but the piece of corporate tax policy most frequently described as containing "loopholes" is the convoluted section that deals with taxing multinational companies -- the giants of corporate America, such as GE, Intel, Microsoft and IBM. The White House earlier proposed closing off ways that companies claim foreign tax credits, and they might trot out those proposals again.

If they do, they could set up more internecine battles within the business community over whether to support the plan. On one side, companies such as Intel are already on the record supporting r&d tax credits. On the other, IBM flatly opposes limiting foreign tax credits, given how much of its operations are overseas.

Originally posted in The Company Beat.

By By Jia Lynn Yang  |  September 7, 2010; 2:06 PM ET
Categories:  Corporate taxes , Corporations  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Morning briefing: Japan keeps interests rates stable, U.K. transit workers strike
Next: 'Recovery Summer' goes bust in GOP video


Question #1: are those running big and small companies playing politics, or sticking to business?

My observation is that most executives at the top of these companies have at least leanings towards being conservative Republicans.

It is in the conservatives/Republicans political interest for the Obama administration to do poorly.

Hoarding money and not hiring personnel might be expected to hurt the public perception of the Obama administration. This might help the conservatives/Republican political position. These executives themselves are financially secure, so unless they have an over-riding business reason to spend money on people, equipment, and supplies, they would probably rather play politics.

Holding money hurts most middle-class people in both the short and long term, and really does not bother these executives.

Clearly, they are continuing the class warfare against the middle class which was pushed so hard and far by the conservatives/Republicans during the GW Bush Administration.

The middle class started to "take our country back" in 2006, and got almost there in 2008.

We can not afford to slip backwards. We must move forwards.

Hopefully, people will not look at the first-order evidence where progress has been stifled by conservatives/Republicans, and will instead look a bit deeper into who has both created our problems and then held back progress in solving them.

Posted by: granvilleWV | September 8, 2010 6:03 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company