Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Chinese imports widen U.S. trade gap

By Howard Schneider
The U.S. trade deficit surged in August as a jump in imports from China overwhelmed a meager rise in American exports. The deficit with China rose from $25.9 billion to just above $28 billlion.

The new data are likely to fuel the trade tensions that have been rising between the two countries and stoke pressure for China to revise some of its economic policies -- chiefly the close management of its currency.

Of particular note: U.S. exports barely increased, rising just $300 million from July to $153.5 billion. The Obama administration is hoping to double U.S. exports over the next five years, but the last few months have shown only sluggish growth. U.S. sales abroad increased just more than six percent for the first eight months of the year.

The country imported $196.1 billion worth of goods and services in August. The resulting $46 billion trade deficit represented a roughly 10 percent increase over July.

By Howard Schneider  | October 14, 2010; 11:02 AM ET
Categories:  China, International Economics, Trade, U.S. Economy  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Economic agenda: Thursday, Oct. 14, 2010
Next: Boston policy conference: clues to what's coming from the Fed?


When a Nation, which has enriched herself by a reciprocal Commerce in Manufactures with other Nations, finds the Balance of Trade turn against her, it is her Interest to put a Stop to it altogether

First, then, it must be inquired, if, in the branch in which she is undersold, her rivals enjoy a natural advantage above her, which no superior industry, frugality, or address on her side, can counterbalance?

First, To renounce this branch of commerce entirely, and to take the commodities wanted from foreigners, as they can furnish them cheaper.

Secondly, To prohibit the importation of such commodities altogether.

Thirdly, To impose a duty upon importation, in order to raise the price of them so high as to make them dearer than the same kind of commodity produced at home.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 14, 2010 12:28 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company