Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity





Posted at 2:00 PM ET, 11/30/2010

Consumer groups: Fed proposal would 'eviscerate' powerful remedy to stop foreclosures

By Ariana Eunjung Cha

The Federal Reserve Board is proposing changes to Truth in Lending mortgage regulations that consumer groups say would hurt homeowners facing wrongful foreclosure.

The controversy revolves around a clause that gives consumers the right to unwind an illegal loan through "rescission" for up to three years after the loan was signed.

A proposed change in the regulations by the Fed that was released last summer would require homeowners to pay the entire amount demanded by the creditor before the creditor is required to cancel the security interest in the home -- basically making the rescission rule useless.

"Instead of informing consumers about the terms of their loans as Congress intended, these proposals would allow broad misstatements of loan terms through new tolerances that are without statutory authority," the Consumers Union, National Consumer Law Center, the Center for Responsible Lending and a dozen other advocacy groups wrote in a letter to the Fed.

The letter pointed out that "the great majority of cases" brought to stop a foreclosure include rescission claims.

A New York Times editorial published Sunday said that requiring a borrower to pay off the remaining principal before the lender gives up its security interest "would be clearly impossible for troubled borrowers." "So," the paper reasoned, "the Fed's proposal would benefit the creditor who violated the law rather than the borrower, paving the way for foreclosures that otherwise could be avoided."

The modification to the rescission clause is part of a broader proposal by the Federal Reserve released on Aug. 16 that was supposed to enhance consumer protections in the act. The 90-day public comment period for the proposal ends on Dec. 23.

A Federal Reserve spokeswoman declined to comment on the proposal Tuesday, but in a written explanation the Fed said that the new regulations would "reduce uncertainty and litigation costs" for creditors.

By Ariana Eunjung Cha  | November 30, 2010; 2:00 PM ET
Categories:  Federal Reserve, Housing  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Cities show shift of growth to emerging markets in Asia and Latin America, Brookings reports
Next: Next WikiLeaks leak: Bank of America?

Comments

Ah yes, the true impetus for the change is revealed:

"...the Fed said that the new regulations would 'reduce uncertainty and litigation costs' for creditors"

After all, it's those poor banks that need protection from the consequences of their own illegal behavior, not the actual victims...

Posted by: Anonymous | November 30, 2010 4:16 PM | Report abuse

Change the law, ex post facto to protect the crimihnal at the expense of the innocent. Gee, America really is "exceptional."

Posted by: mcstowy | November 30, 2010 5:55 PM | Report abuse


With mortgage rates at all-time lows, now may be a great time to refinance -- if you meet new stringent criteria. Search online for "123 Mortgage Refinance" they got me the 3.21% rate even with my not so good credit history.

Posted by: Anonymous | December 1, 2010 12:40 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company