Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity





Posted at 6:19 AM ET, 11/17/2010

House sustains Obama veto on mortgage bill

By Associated Press

In a largely token vote, the House on Wednesday declined to override President Barack Obama's veto of legislation that could have facilitated the processing of home foreclosure documents.

Obama, in rejecting the bill, said it could worsen problems related to recent revelations that some mortgage lenders have been evicting homeowners using fraudulent or flawed methods to expedite foreclosures.

"The president took the responsible course in refusing to sign the bill, so we can give it a fresh examination in light of these concerns," House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., said.

he House vote was 235-185 against overriding the veto. A veto override requires a two-thirds majority.

The legislation was meant to improve interstate commerce by requiring that notarized documents be recognized in any state or federal court. It would have allowed notarized documents to be processed electronically.

The bill's sponsor, Rep. Robert Aderholt, R-Ala., argued that his legislation had no connection to the recent foreclosure problems. "This legislation expressly requires that lawful notarizations be recognized in other states and in no way validates improper notarizations."

"Let's be a little more careful here," responded Conyers. "A million people are losing their homes."

The White House, in explaining the president's veto a month ago, said the legislation could have "unintended consequences on consumer protections." Consumer advocates argued that it could make it difficult for homeowners to challenge foreclosure documents prepared in other states.

Among the problems that have emerged as lenders try to quickly process the flood of foreclosures caused by the mortgage crisis have been cases of not having a notary public in the room to certify that a signature is valid or having employees sign documents without reading them.

Obama has vetoed only two bills during his presidency. The other addressed a technicality on a defense spending bill. Both were "pocket vetoes," where the president fails to sign a bill within 10 days while Congress is not in session.

By Associated Press  | November 17, 2010; 6:19 AM ET
Categories:  Congress, Housing, White House  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: 50 state attorneys general probing foreclosures mess in negotiations over compensation fund
Next: Economic agenda: Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2010

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company