Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity





Posted at 5:31 PM ET, 12/ 6/2010

Obama, Lee outlined U.S.-Korea trade deal in Seoul, official says

By Howard Schneider

The outlines of the Korea-U.S. trade deal announced last week were brokered in a head-to-head meeting between President Obama and South Korean leader Lee Myung-bak in Seoul early last month. There the two leaders agreed to accommodate the domestic political problems each faced over the agreement, according to a senior administration official.

It was in that session, the official said, that Obama made clear to Lee that he would not put the deal before Congress without substantial new concessions from Korea for the U.S. auto industry. Such moves were needed, he believed, to help boost U.S. carmakers and correct the impression that previous free trade deals "traded off manufacturing for other parts of the economy," the official said.

At the same time, said the official, who was not authorized to speak for the record, Obama said he recognized it would be tough for Lee to fully open the Korean market to U.S. beef exports, given the scare over mad cow disease several years ago.

Even as the leaders left the meeting with the disappointing news that they would not reach a deal in Seoul, they had the rough outlines of a compromise that fell together last week in Maryland after four days of talks. Meeting at the Sheraton hotel in Columbia, with an artificial lake and Columbia Mall as the diplomatic backdrop, U.S. negotiators agreed to set the beef issue aside for now, while delaying for at least five years any reduction in the tariffs imposed on Korean auto imports into the United States. American automakers were also given freer market access under Korean safety and environmental regulations.

The talks were monitored closely by Obama, the official said, and other top administration officials were also deeply involved in an agreement that the White House hopes will begin building a new consensus on U.S. trade policy.

A pivotal session came Wednesday, when Ford Motor Co. chief executive Alan Mulally met with Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and Lawrence H. Summers, outgoing head of the National Economic Council, and concurred on a revised tariff schedule that the Korean side later accepted. Ford had focused on the tariff issue, among other things, because of the large amount of money that a cut in U.S. levies would provide Korean exporters such as Hyundai, compared with the relative pittance it would provide Ford based on the few thousand cars it sends to Korea. Hyundai ships hundreds of thousands of cars to the United States each year.

The United Autoworkers union and key auto-state legislators in both parties also have endorsed the final agreement.

"It has been a long time since a union supported a trade agreement," the administration official said, adding that the White House is expecting a "big, broad bipartisan vote" for the Korea agreement when it is put before Congress next year.

By Howard Schneider  | December 6, 2010; 5:31 PM ET
Categories:  International Economics, President's Council of Economic Advisors, Trade, U.S. Economy, White House  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Korea-U.S. trade talks advance
Next: Economic agenda: Tuesday, Dec. 7, 2010

Comments

Of course the unions support it - it provides years of tariff protection. In short, the auto provisions aren't "free trade" at all - just continuation of the protectionist status quo. Pathetic.

Posted by: Anonymous | December 6, 2010 9:58 PM | Report abuse

The talks were monitored closely by Obama.
------
Company Van Insurance

Posted by: Anonymous | December 7, 2010 6:28 AM | Report abuse

Is it free trade if we remove our tariffs against imports from S. Korea, but they refuse to allow our exports to enter their market? Think about it? Free trade is a two-way street. But right-wingers always want to blame everything on unions, and coiuld care less about U.S. manufacturing...

Posted by: Anonymous | December 7, 2010 10:18 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company