Weather Gang Blog
Customize your weather

Enter your zip code and click "Accept" to set weather for any U.S. location. (You'll have to do this again - once - for each computer you use.)

Udalls, Bennet To Seek Filibuster Rule Change Tomorrow

10:53 AM ET, 01/ 4/2011
As the Durango Herald's Joe Hanel reports:

Colorado's U.S. senators have lined up with fellow Democrats for a one-shot chance Wednesday to change Senate rules that allow Republicans to block much of President Barack Obama's agenda...

Various filibuster rules require 60 yes votes out of the body of 100 in order to pass a bill or even debate it. A single senator can also block debate of a bill or confirmation of the president's nominees.

Sen. Michael Bennet called for reform of Senate rules during his election campaign last year. He is pushing for a vote Wednesday, when the new Senate convenes, to pass a new set of rules that diminish minority power. Democrats will have a 53-47 advantage in the Senate starting Wednesday.

Sen. Mark Udall also is pushing for approval of a new set of rules drafted by his cousin, New Mexico Sen. Tom Udall.

Democrats have a chance Wednesday to change Senate rules with a simple majority vote, rather than the two-thirds majority it usually takes.

Could have used that in 2009, don't you think? According to Hanel, the rule change sought by Sens. Mark Udall, Tom Udall of New Mexico, and Michael Bennet would stop the ease with which a filibuster can be sustained by mere threats and assertions--requiring opponents to actually show up at the Capitol and speak from the podium, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington style, and be able to produce the 40 required votes to keep a filibuster going on a continuous basis. They also want to end the practice in the Senate of "anonymous holds" on legislation and nominations.

Momentary considerations always make weakening of the filibuster attractive to a narrow majority, though everyone looks at changes like these with an eye toward their own possible minority status someday. But there's an argument that loosening of Senate rules allowing a small group of Senators to stop everything has hurt both parties' rightful agenda in turn--and the public's confidence in government generally. Requiring filibusters to involve effort, like the public assumes they do today, might at least help make sure they're reserved for when really necessary.


Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz

No comments have been posted to this entry.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About Colorado Pols

Colorado's most widely read and discussed political blog, Colorado Pols has become a must-read for politicos in the state since 2004. Colorado Pols attracts readers from both sides of the aisle, and its "Big Line" tracker of the state's top races has become a barometer for politicians, staffers and local media.
Visit Site

Other Blogs in the Political Blog Network

Alabama

Doc's Political Parlor

California

Calbuzz

Calitics

Colorado

Colorado Pols

Iowa

The Iowa Republican

Massachusetts

Blue Mass Group

Missouri

Fired Up! Missouri

New Jersey

Save Jersey

Ohio

Buckeye State Blog

Third Base Politics

Pennsylvania

pa2010.com

Politics PA

South Carolina

FITSNews

Virginia

Bearing Drift

Blue Virginia