Post I.T. - Washington Post Technology Blog Frank Ahrens Sara Goo Sam Diaz Mike Musgrove Alan Sipress Yuki Noguchi Post I.T.
Tech Podcast
The Bloggers
Subscribe to this Blog

Archive: Kendra Marr

Posted at 7:11 AM ET, 02/27/2008

TSA blog

The Transportation Security Administration is really listening -- and responding -- to travelers' online gripes.

The agency's new blog, Evolution of Security, went up on Jan. 30. and was almost immediately flooded by angry rants in the comments section.

And TSA bloggers, to the surprise of some readers, are weighing in on some of the complaints. Reader "Anonymous" wrote: "My concern is germs!!! Not everybody has clean feet. I do not want a foot fungus because some other passenger didn't take care of their feet. It's bad enough to hear about the misfortunes of people from nail salons; we have to worry about the airports too???"

Less than three hours later, TSA blogger "Nico" responded with a hygiene study: "Germs aren't an issue. We had Health and Human Services study this issue for us back in 2003 and their findings were there are no more germs on airport floors than there are in the gym or any average locker room. HHS specifically said in their Aug. 12, 2003 letter, the chances of disease spreading are 'extremely small to remote.'"

Blogger LT Nixon asked TSA about a personal experience when he, along with other military personnel serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, was traveling from Kuwait to Atlanta during a 2-week R&R period. Why did they need to undress and go through security again in Atlanta?

The same day, "tsa tos ny" read his gripe on the Web site and wrote back a lengthy message saying, "As a TSA Screening Manager I would 1st like to apologize for the fact that we have to screen you at all and would just like to say that the screening force more than respects the active duty military personnel."

--Kendra Marr

Posted by Sara Goo | Permalink | Comments (0)
Share This: TrackBack (0) | Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This

Posted at 1:02 PM ET, 02/21/2008

Readers Chime in on Photo Privacy

In today's paper, I wrote a story about a Washington mom and her mishap with the private settings on Flickr -- photos of her children skinny-dipping, which she thought were private, turned out not to be.

Of course when it comes to the Internet, nothing is sacred. In college a friend showed me how he could see all the photos on my computer -- they weren't even on a picture sharing Web site! -- with a couple of keystrokes, thanks to our dorm's holey network server. I quickly ran upstairs and unplugged my computer before he got into anything too embarrassing (or any of my term papers)!

Okay, so my friend was a tech savvy computer science major. But readers were quick to point out that if there's a will, there's always a way to see "private" material online -- even after it's deleted:

Reader "justjunkemail" wrote: "I've been in and around technology for 30 plus years and there is NOTHING private about the Internet. Someone, somewhere, somehow has access to what you post up to a server."

Reader "ltm353" commented that, "As a rule of thumb: if you wouldn't want it on the front page of a newspaper, don't post it. After all this time and technology, seems a wax seal is more secure."

And "jcovey" noted: "why didn't she just email the pictures to her parents? why involve a web site with a server that will archive copies of those pictures perhaps indefinitely?"

Some tried to provide the mom with answers to how someone bypassed her privacy settings. Reader "annoyed5" wrote: "This woman's Yahoo account was hacked. She probably checked her mail from a hotel computer and a keylogger grabbed her password. Since your Yahoo password is also your Flickr password, the hacker checked her photostream for fun, and flipped the settings to public thinking it was funny."

And many readers blasted the woman, Meredith Massey for even uploading nude photos of her children on the Internet. Washingtonpost.com's OnParenting blog first wrote about this.

In her defense, the photos were more embarrassing than X-rated. Think about all those sudsy childhood bath time snapshots that parents love to print and frame. They're definitely horrifying when you're in middle school, and your friends spot them hanging on the wall -- or, even more so, when your mom whips out the family photo album to share. But they're nowhere near pornographic.

--Kendra Marr

Posted by Sara Goo | Permalink | Comments (0)
Share This: TrackBack (0) | Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This

 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company