Conductor's Assisted Suicide
In Friday's paper, we have a wire obituary of British conductor Edward Downes, who died this week at the age of 85. He was a conductor of modest renown but his obituary has become a huge story in England because of the manner in which he died.
Downes and his wife, a former ballet dancer, died together -- holding hands, apparently -- at an assisted suicide clinic in Switzerland. Assisted suicide is illegal in Britain, and the dual deaths of Downes and his wife, Joan, have renewed a sometimes heated debate about the issue.
The obituary in the Guardian directly addresses the issue, and columnist Alexander Chancellor draws parallels between the suicides and the dramatic deaths (and occasional suicides) in opera, while lamenting the "creepy" circumstances in which the Downeses died.
For better of worse, much of the British coverage -- including articles in the Telegraph, Independent and Daily Mail -- has dwelled at least as much on how Downes died as on what he accomplished when he was alive. The New York Times story -- it's not an obituary in the standard sense -- is almost entirely about the joint suicide.
The whole question is morally complex, certainly, but it raises particular concerns for obituary writers and editors. Should we include more information about the manner of death, especially when it is part of a larger public debate, or should we focus on the life itself? My own feeling is that death is the occasion for an obituary but is by no means its primary subject. An obituary should be about life. Others may differ.
If you have any thoughts about assisted suicide and whether such public issues should be part of obituaries, please let us know with a comment below.
Please email us to report offensive comments.
Posted by: phburris | July 17, 2009 1:31 PM
Posted by: phburris | July 17, 2009 1:33 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.