Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Obama Cozies Up to Congress

Rereading the transcript of President Obama’s speech from Tuesday night, it struck me that, for a president whose approval ratings are far higher than those of his colleagues in the legislative branch, Obama went out of his way to pay deference to Congress. Not only did Congress “deliver” on the stimulus bill, the president was “grateful” for it. Contrast that to President Bush’s cool treatment of congressional leaders’ work on the first stimulus bill in his 2008 state of the union, when he merely acknowledged that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Minority Leader John Boehner had come to an agreement with him. Bush even coolly punctuated it with a command: “This Congress must pass it as soon as possible.”

Bush often complained about things Congresses -- even Republican ones -- hadn’t passed, as when he whined in his 2006 state of the union that his social security reform didn’t move. Obama tried to be maximally complimentary, giving sole credit to Congress for doing more on health care reform “in the last 30 days than we've done in the last decade” by expanding a children’s health program. Of course, the new president has less to complain about thus far. But so did Bush in 2001, when he scolded Congress on entitlements: “Everyone in this chamber knows that Social Security is not prepared to fully fund their retirement.”

Obama’s word choice alone indicates a different approach to presidential relations with the legislative branch. The president spoke to the assembled legislators in the first person plural -- about “our” recovery plan, for example. It reminded me of the primary campaign trail, on which he would tell his audiences about how “we” would become the nominee.

But the deferential approach is more than rhetorical. Unlike some past presidents, Obama didn’t present Congress with a list of extremely detailed policy prescriptions. The policy was there, but in skeletal form. Obama asked Congress to send him legislation placing a “market-based cap” on carbon emissions. The details, it seems, would be filled in by congressional committee staffers. Obama did not release his budget plan before giving the speech, so he only spoke in broad terms about his spending priorities. That made the president sound less demanding, even if he passed up his chance to put lots of specific numbers on the record in front of millions of viewers. He even invited Congress to meddle heavily with his spending requests: “Everyone in this chamber -- Democrats and Republicans -- will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities for which there are no dollars. And that includes me.”

None of the last four presidents had Congresses as friendly as this one is to Obama. And Obama is trying to keep it that way. It’s not just that he is setting bottom-line goals and letting others battle over many of the details, which other presidents have done from time to time. He is also flattering Congress’s strong personalities. Obama sacrificing some pride still might not get his hugely ambitious agenda passed. But it can’t hurt, and it is, frankly, nice to see a politician choose to do so from a position of strength.

By Stephen Stromberg  | February 25, 2009; 9:18 AM ET
Categories:  Stromberg  | Tags:  Stephen Stromberg  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Poor Gov. Jindal
Next: The Deficit Is Obama's Now

Comments

Stephen,

I agree with your assessment of the President's speech, and that he is reaching out from a position of strength.

But I do not think he is sacrificing any pride by doing so, because frankly I don't believe he operates that way. He is not a prideful man by nature, which makes him extremely rare as a politician. It is the real key to his potential.

Posted by: mikeinmidland | February 26, 2009 2:11 PM | Report abuse

So being nice to a bunch of people who's approval rating has been in the single digits for a couple of years indicates he is a nice guy. Cool, he's a nice guy.

Now let's see what he was elected to do, lead a country.

Posted by: Bowhunter | February 28, 2009 5:13 PM | Report abuse


FISCAL RESPONSABLILITY, FISCAL EQUALITY,TRANSPARENCY,HONESTY
,INTEGRITY;…..all those words, and the concepts behind them ARE TOTALLY ALIEN TO OBAMA AND HIS GANG.
WE NEED BETTER LEADERS AT HELM FOR OUR GREAT COUNTRY, THE CURRENT ADMINSTRATION, LOADED WITH ELEMENTS OF QUESTINALBLE INTEGRITY IS JUST NOT GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE.

I am a simple man, and all I see is that WE, the people were cheated, our trust and money continues to be abused and the perpetrators still at large.

I do not have any confidence on this CORRUPTED PRESENT ADMINISTRATION WHICH IS PERPETUATING THIS ASSAULT AND MOVING THIS GREAT NATION TO OBLIVION.

It seems that Obama(tagged as ‘president’) IS the ‘FRONT MAN’, A ‘TROJAN HORSE FACTOR’, if you will, in a group interested to DESTROY OUR GREAT COUNTRY VIA ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, AND WEAKENING OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE STRUCTURE.

But the real ‘behind the scene’ CONTROLLERS of this MASTER PLAN, have to be INDENTIFIED, EXPOSED AND PROVED TO BE AS THEY REALLY ARE,…ENEMIES OF THE STATE.

Here is an idea; a team of atorneys-at-the-law, experts in THE CONSTITUTION, …investigators journalists analysts, TO LAUNCH A MASSIVE TOUR THE FORCE program of RESEARCH to PROVE TO THE PUBLIC this CURRENT CORRUPTED ADMINSTRATION AS ANTI-AMERICAN/UN-AMERICAN PRACTICES ORIENTED…so they will be IDENTIFIED AND PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC.

Then, A CALL for a GENERAL CITIZENS REFERENDUM, in order to REMOVE FROM WASHINGTON ALL OF THEM AND BE REPLACED WITH HONEST, AND SERIOUS OFFICERS TO SERVE THE COUNTRY, WITH INTEGRITY.

Perhaps, doing this - or something on that line of thought - , we do not have to wait for 2010 not even 2012 to TAKE OUR BELOVED COUNTRY BACK!

Impeachments had been done before ( for presidents, governors, etc),…perhaps THIS ONE, will be the first one on history,… to be the first of its kind… A TOTAL GOVERNMENT ANTI-TREASON IMPEACHMENT.

I am sure the atorneys-at-the-law expertise will find the APPROPIATE TERMINOLOGY AND SEMANTICS TO DEAL WITH THIS ONE.

Good day everyone,
Daniel Cabrera
Merrillville,Indiana

Posted by: morcab | March 2, 2009 11:33 AM | Report abuse

Cabrera, please start this before our country is gone. There are alot of people who would follow you. BO can not stop campaigning and is ruining our great country. Congress has done a gone job of ruining it with him.

Posted by: annnort | March 5, 2009 1:07 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company