Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Houston's stereotype-breaking election

Some of the media coverage of the Houston mayoral race took a bit of a man-bites-dog tone. Houston? The one in Texas? Gay??

Yes. Yes. And yes.

With Annise Parker’s win on Saturday, Houston became the largest U.S. city to elect an openly gay mayor. Houston is the fourth-largest city in the country and is thought to have the sixth-largest openly gay population among all American cities. When I lived there in the ’90s, in the same Montrose neighborhood where Parker lives now, the city didn’t exactly fit Northeastern stereotypes of conservative, big-hat-and-buckle-wearing Texas. I remember sitting in a neighborhood sports bar one night when a half-dozen men in drag, and wearing roller blades, came in for the football game. People scarcely looked up from the TV.

The general meme is that the East and West coasts are bastions of tolerance compared with places like Houston. And Houstonians did vote several years ago to prohibit the extension of benefits to domestic partners of city employees (though coastal access doesn’t guarantee equality either, as California and Maine residents demonstrated this year to their shame).

But Houstonians overwhelmingly said they didn’t care about Annise Parker’s sexual orientation. Seventy-seven percent of likely voters queried this month told the Houston Chronicle that it was a non-issue in their decision for mayor. At some level, this doesn’t surprise me. This is the same place that, against every common principle of community development, remains the only major American city to eschew formal zoning ordinances, letting people build pretty much whatever, wherever they choose. The city tends to operate with a live-and-let-live ethos that is, in many ways, decidedly Texan and should logically extend to people’s personal lives.

Of course, live and let live goes only so far: Gay marriage is still barred by Texas’s constitution, and Annise Parker’s partner still can’t participate in her city benefits program. But when asked to look at two individual candidates to manage the city, balance the budget and get the trash collected on time, Houstonians decided that Parker’s personal life wasn’t particularly relevant. It will be interesting to see how long it takes other ostensibly more liberal cities to follow Houston’s progressive lead.

By Kevin Huffman  | December 14, 2009; 6:04 PM ET
Categories:  Huffman  | Tags:  Kevin Huffman  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Charles Lane's 'oldful' attack
Next: Harry Reid's plan or nothing?

Comments

Teabagger, of which there are a lot in Texas, must have had an awful time - do they vote for the black candidate or the gay candidate? The how do they explain it? Priceless.

Posted by: orange3 | December 15, 2009 6:15 AM | Report abuse

So, a gay women was voted in? And there are blacks that have been voted in. What would make real history in this country would be if an atheist was voted in.

Posted by: jckdoors | December 15, 2009 9:16 AM | Report abuse

Just want to add that Dallas, formerly known as the Buckle of the Bible Belt, the home turf of Walker Texas Ranger, elected a Hispanic Lesbian for Sheriff. In the last mayoral election, two out of three front-runners were gay (although the straight guy got that one). Texas is gradually joining the Union - once it does, the nativist, homophobic reactionary GOP will have to adapt or die. Conservatives like to say this is a center-right country - if Texas is in play in future national elections, we may actually get a center-right party to compete against the center-left Dems. Oh Happy Day!

Posted by: geoffcgraham | December 15, 2009 11:14 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company