Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Ron Brownstein on Obama and blue-collar voters

Highlighting the problem with drive-by conversations, Ron Brownstein has alerted me to a key fact in my last post about the importance of the blue-collar vote for President Obama: I misheard him. So that nothing gets lost in translation, here is what Brownstein explains that he said to me as I was leaving "Morning Joe."

I did not say to you this morning and have never said that blue-collar voters will warm to Obama by 2012… what I said was they wouldn’t be as important to the outcome in 2012 as in 2010 because non-white and younger voters will be a larger share of the electorate than they will be this November. All signs are that Obama will struggle to match even the meager 40 percent of non-college whites that he attracted in 2008, but he can survive that if he does well among the other groups in what I’ve called his “coalition of the ascendant”: young people, non-whites and college-educated whites. After all, he has already won the most decisive Democratic victory since LBJ while winning only 40 percent of blue-collar whites in the first place. The reason: they are now just two-in-five of all voters in a presidential year, down from an absolute majority as recently as Clinton’s first election in 1992. They are a greater threat for Dems in 2010 because so much of the House caucus still represents districts dominated by them (see my “A House Divided")

As Brownstein acknowledges, Obama can survive a repeat of his meager showing among non-college whites in 2008 "if he does well" in 2012 among the groups in that "coalition of the ascendant." A lot of those voters in that coalition went to the polls for the first time in 2008. Will they show up with the same enthusiasm and in the same numbers to reelect Obama? Luckily for the president, he's got two years to work on that.

By Jonathan Capehart  | May 19, 2010; 12:31 PM ET
Categories:  Capehart  | Tags:  Jonathan Capehart  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Good news, bad news for Democrats, Obama in Murtha district
Next: Arizona's immigration law -- and China's human rights abuses


He has worked awfully hard at getting rid of all of them. The young people who are graduating into a world of no jobs and laid off parents, may listen to their parents THIS time.

Posted by: annnort | May 19, 2010 2:42 PM | Report abuse

I'm assuming that Brownstein's reference to "ascendent" translates to the 190,000 foreign workers brought into the US each month since Obama took office, and has provided visas to enter the US to take jobs previously held by US citizens, who are being fired or encouraged to retire. That's been 18 months worth which equals 3,420,000 foreign nationals who Obama has imported into the country. Is that why he is displacing the US citizenry from their jobs, committing economic genocide against and the reason the dems feel quite safe in trampling the US constitution?

Posted by: jenn3 | May 20, 2010 7:43 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company