Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Senate moves on food safety -- finally

Before we get consumed by Elena-mania (President Obama is set to pick Solicitor General Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court later this morning, in case you somehow haven't heard), I'd like to point out this little, yet significant, news nugget nestled in Saturday's paper about peace breaking out in the Senate. "A food-safety bill headed to the Senate floor later this month has picked up GOP co-sponsors," wrote The Post's Shailagh Murray. This is great news for all of us, but especially for those who have suffered through E. coli and salmonella outbreaks in a maddeningly long list of tainted foods -- including tomatoes, jalapenos, peanuts, pistachios and spinach.

The House passed its comprehensive food-safety bill ages ago. But the bill has gone nowhere since it arrived in the Senate last August. Not even the March recall of more than 100 products containing hydrolyzed vegetable protein sold by Basic Food Flavors (one of the largest food recalls in U.S. history, by the way) seemed to move the ball. Things didn't get out of hand with HVP for two reasons. First, because the salmonella lurking within the flavor enhancer is cooked either by the food processing company or at home by the consumer. Second, because a new reporting system that requires contamination to be reported within 24 hours was instituted last year.

The bill sitting in the Senate would do much more. Companies would be required to devise food safety plans. The law would give the Food and Drug Administration the power to mandate product recalls. More importantly, it would empower the secretary of health and human services to create a food-tracing system that would allow the FDA to find the source of contamination by tracing ingredients from "farm to fork."

That nice bit of alliteration is courtesy of Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), who has been pushing to get food traceability and mandatory recall for years. Perhaps the new team spirit in the Senate will finally turn the languishing food-safety bill into law.

By Jonathan Capehart  | May 9, 2010; 7:44 AM ET
Categories:  Capehart  | Tags:  Jonathan Capehart  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Sorry to see Bob Bennett lose
Next: Toyota, Massey, BP and the shrinking list of good corporate citizens

Comments

It's about time!

Posted by: 1toughlady | May 10, 2010 10:18 AM | Report abuse

'Require food companies to devise food safety plans???' Like BP had to devise a safety plan...
It does NO good to write a law that will never be enforced. Ten years from now we'll still have children dying from e. coli unless there's a bunch of money spent on enforcement..for that matter, if we'd just enforce the laws we already have..oh, well, that's not gonna happen, is it?

Posted by: bgreen2224 | May 10, 2010 1:34 PM | Report abuse

Why hasn't the USDA and the EPA tested the farm fields and/or farmers "CROPS"?

Why hasn't the USDA and the EPA checked to see if any of the crops have had bio-control products used on them?

Biopesticides, Biofungicides and Bioinsecticides that are manufactured and used on farmer's crops are LIVING microorganisms (bacteria and/or fungi).

Are any of these bio-control "products" contaminated?

Why does the USDA and the EPA allow Biopesticides, Biofungicides and Bioinsecticides to be MANUFACTURED IN MEXICO and USED on American crops?

IF THERE IS NO FEAR OF CONTAMINATION IN BIO-CONTROL PRODUCTS;
WHY does the EPA Form 8570-6 say?:

QUOTE:
"After fermentation and prior to further processing, each batch must be tested for the following microbial contaminants and have levels below those listed":

•"E. coli Coliform Bacteria"
•"Salmonella"
•"Shigella"
•"Staphlococci"
•"Vibrio"
•"Yeast"
•"Mold"

Posted by: strend | May 11, 2010 2:48 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company