Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Shirley Sherrod and the White House's true colors

I suppose I came to the Shirley Sherrod episode the same way most people did. I heard a news snippet about an African American Agriculture Department official regaling an NAACP audience in Georgia with a story about how, when working with a nonprofit group that served rural farmers, she deliberately provided less service to a white farmer because of his race.

Outrageous, I thought, if true. My first impulse was to learn more about what happened, and, if possible, to speak to her. But almost immediately the story broke down. It turns out that the reported racist remarks were based on a carefully edited video of her speech that excluded the main and salutary point of her story.

Sherrod’s smearing was the handiwork of a right-wing blogger who was aided and abetted by the right-wing media out to destroy the president of the United States.

But the right wing didn’t fire Sherrod based upon a doctored tape and without hearing her side. The order to kick her out the door came from within the highest reaches of the Obama administration -- the secretary of agriculture, and apparently with the White House looking on.

Just watch her speech. Listen to every word.

What the blogger did was mean and ugly. The administration’s behavior, however, was disgusting. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has apologized and offered her another job. But the administration, under fire on a bogus matter of race, showed its true colors.

Vilsak's initial response was in keeping with the behavior of a poll-driven, afraid-of-the-right pol. What's the nation's first black president's excuse?

By Colbert King  | July 21, 2010; 6:26 PM ET
Categories:  King  | Tags:  Colbert King  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: 'A disservice was done' by Andrew Breitbart
Next: Tom Vilsack's classy apology

Comments

What the blogger did was mean and ugly. The administration’s behavior, however, was disgusting.

=======================================

I'll grant you all that, but one aspect that has been completely ignored by most everyone in the media is why Andrew Breitbart published the clip: When Sherrod described her refusal to help the white farmer, the crowd approved, even coming close to cheering. It was an answer to the NAACP accusation of bigotry of the Tea Party.

That being said, I'm glad she's being reinstated and being made whole.

Posted by: bbface21 | July 21, 2010 6:57 PM | Report abuse

The NAACP was also "snookered" by the doctored tape, as Benjamin Jealous said. I'm not happy with the Obama administration - they should have at least given her a chance to tell her side before firing her, and the NAACP should have done the same. But to say that the "blogger" was "mean and ugly" is an understatement. The blogger is Andrew Brietbart, of doctored tapes against ACORN fame. The man is out to destroy Obama, he's made that clear. He makes racially inflammatory statements all the time. Obama and the NAACP need to calm down and take their time before responding to these attacks. These attacks are going to continue to come and they will continue to include race baiting.

Posted by: minnesotamama | July 21, 2010 7:03 PM | Report abuse

"What the blogger did was mean and ugly."
=======================================
The blogger was a Tea Party guy that was firing back against NAACP allegations of racism. Of course what the NAACP did wasn't mean or ugly to you because they were smearing white people.

Posted by: peterg73 | July 21, 2010 7:08 PM | Report abuse

Well, congratulations, Mr. King, you earned your pay today. You slipped your audience the "mickey" pretty well:
"The order to kick her out the door came from within the highest reaches of the Obama administration -- the secretary of agriculture, and apparently with the White House looking on."
I guess we are supposed to now repeat the assigned mantra: "THE WHITE HOUSE DIDN'T FIRE HER. THEY MERELY WERE LOOKING ON"
Your last line directed to the President was just a weak cosmetic line.
He doesn't even have the guts to admit he is a horrible leader. Even my kid's manager at Carl's Jr. gets to the bottom of the story when the employees are late or mess up, and the manager is only 19 yrs old. But then he has more management experience than our President. It has nothing to do with color. The President is INCOMPETENT. Stop trying to deflect and cover it up, and then pretend you are calling him on it.

Posted by: realitybased1 | July 21, 2010 7:15 PM | Report abuse

Well, congratulations, Mr. King, you earned your pay today. You slipped your audience the "mickey" pretty well:
"The order to kick her out the door came from within the highest reaches of the Obama administration -- the secretary of agriculture, and apparently with the White House looking on."
I guess we are supposed to now repeat the assigned mantra: "THE WHITE HOUSE DIDN'T FIRE HER. THEY MERELY WERE LOOKING ON"
Your last line directed to the President was just a weak cosmetic line.
He doesn't even have the guts to admit he is a horrible leader. Even my kid's manager at Carl's Jr. gets to the bottom of the story when the employees are late or mess up, and the manager is only 19 yrs old. But then he has more management experience than our President. It has nothing to do with color. The President is INCOMPETENT. Stop trying to deflect and cover it up, and then pretend you are calling him on it.

Posted by: realitybased1 | July 21, 2010 7:16 PM | Report abuse

Well, congratulations, Mr. King, you earned your pay today. You slipped your audience the "mickey" pretty well:
"The order to kick her out the door came from within the highest reaches of the Obama administration -- the secretary of agriculture, and apparently with the White House looking on."
I guess we are supposed to now repeat the assigned mantra: "THE WHITE HOUSE DIDN'T FIRE HER. THEY MERELY WERE LOOKING ON"
Your last line directed to the President was just a weak cosmetic line.
He ,and you his followers, don't even have the guts to own their hasty, unjust actions. Even my kid's manager at Carl's Jr. does some checking of the story when his employees are late or mess up, and the manager is only 19 yrs old! But then he has more management experience than our President. It has nothing to do with color. The President is INCOMPETENT. Stop trying to deflect and cover it up, and then pretend you are calling him on it.

Posted by: realitybased1 | July 21, 2010 7:19 PM | Report abuse

can we make some distinctions here? Yes, the White House showed how stupid it was in this incident (and from what I read Obama needs to fire Jim Messina at this point, which would be fine with me because he's been terrible on gay issues too). Why, on the other hand, is nobody reminding us that this is a good occasion to shine a very bright light on Andrew Breitbart and the fact he has nothing to say unless he's misrepresenting or lying about something? Why does he get a free pass? Are our standards so low now?

Posted by: DaveinNorthridge | July 21, 2010 7:46 PM | Report abuse

Let's work together. Amen. Colorless and focused. Just like the leadership successful in my state. Painful suffering fighting for equality. My circumstances don't make everyone's happy either.

Posted by: bandwheel-products | July 21, 2010 8:50 PM | Report abuse

Obummer (adj): When the first mulatto president steps on his schlong and causes a scandal that the media who are in the tank for him have to clean up.

daily (adj): How often there is an Obummer.

Posted by: oldno7 | July 21, 2010 9:21 PM | Report abuse

bbface21 wrote:

"When Sherrod described her refusal to help the white farmer, the crowd approved, even coming close to cheering. It was an answer to the NAACP accusation of bigotry of the Tea Party."

Maybe they did in Breitbart's version, but in the actual, original video they did nothing of the kind. She said first that God had showed her the error of racism, then she began confessing how wrong she had been, then she described how she had not helped the farmer as much as she could. The crowd was silent.

Either your memory of the video is faulty, or Breitbart doctored the audio track. You have been snookered again.

Either way, if you add 30 seconds from the tape before the comments, or 2 minutes after them, you will see that her message was exactly the opposite of the version Breitbart foisted upon the world.

Maybe, instead of believing the worst about the NAACP -- as you seem so quick to do -- you should start to suspect that Breitbart is conning you, and you should take the trouble to see the whole tape. Anyone who knows the first thing about the NAACP knows that racism is not welcome there and never has been.

Posted by: JedRothwell | July 21, 2010 9:43 PM | Report abuse

It is high time all media who care about their credibility stand up against these faux journalists and faux news networks! Don't try to imitate them, call them out when they are wrong!!!

I give CNN a lot of credit for bringing out all the facts! CNN, the lowest rated cable news network, even thought they are the most trustworthy! Fox news is the epitomy of yellow journalism, and it should be clear to everyone now that it has an agenda and should be taken with a grain of salt. It no longer has credibility. People like Bill Hemmert, Chris Wallace, and other real journalists at Fox are beginning to stink.

Posted by: sandnsmith | July 21, 2010 10:15 PM | Report abuse

'What's the nation's first black president's excuse?'

It's a damning question. Thank you for asking it so plainly.

Posted by: Anonymous32 | July 21, 2010 10:16 PM | Report abuse

'What's the nation's first black president's excuse?'

It's a damning question. Thank you for asking it so plainly.

Posted by: Anonymous32 | July 21, 2010 10:16 PM |
=========================================
Couldn't we work Constitutional Law Professor in there somewhere ?

Maybe I'm grinding an ax here because I took the trouble to write a nice letter to Whitehouse.gov last night. However every "crime", the farmer, the firing, the 'injustice' all are prohibited by the 13th and 14th Amendment (as 18 USC 242). That a Constitutional Law Professor would not know that from memory is inexcusable. That the din of Election Year politics inside the beltway should be so distracting that every Civil Servant could forget something that might land them in jail is unfathomable.

Posted by: gannon_dick | July 21, 2010 10:41 PM | Report abuse

Well said.

Posted by: pjsilva | July 21, 2010 10:55 PM | Report abuse

it's so effing retarded.

the quantity of remarks against ms sherrod based on an edited video; even long after the full interview was available for review; makes me want very much to disassociate myself from this nation's ill-conceived notion of freedom of the press.

i dont care if the lady was black or green or chartruese, the fact that directly after the crappily edited video went live on the net, she was immediately treated to the full 24 hour news cycle (consisting of reporting rumors as fact, actively lying to please regular viewers, and vying for elbow room against other less than reputable news outlets for higher ratings by stretching the original story into any one of thousands of misinterpretations). You cannot believe ANYTHING that you hear anymore from respected news sources unless you know the person relaying the information personally. And seriously when did youtube videos become referential sources?

Posted by: sql_yoda | July 22, 2010 12:50 AM | Report abuse

Liberal media continues to ignore the real story - the audience reaction.

Posted by: Jmacaco4 | July 22, 2010 3:53 AM | Report abuse

And the NAACP has smeared the Tea Party based in part on the lies of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Posted by: Jmacaco4 | July 22, 2010 4:00 AM | Report abuse

The administration overreacted. But the real problem was the usual right wing liars that should be sued till they live under a bridge. All of them. They hate this country and constantly try to devide us. I am tired of their lies and hatred. They are terrorists and should be treated as such. Their game just like alqueda is to keep scaring people. Why should we be getting our news through foreigners like Murdoch and the Saudis that own Fox? Enough of these liars already

Posted by: jimbobkalina | July 22, 2010 4:58 AM | Report abuse

Less than two years ago, this nation elected its first black president. On the way to the White House, this man looked into the face and stared down opponents who accused him of being a Muslim, not an American citizen, a black power radical in disguise, insufficiently Christian, and allied with a black demagogue pastor. He soldiered on despite the threat of assassination of any black in his position.

Less than two years later, this same man heads an administration whose members run like scared rabbits in the face of a wing-nut ideologue blogger putting a edited tape on the Internet and calling it news.

What in God's name is wrong with these people? What turned them from fire-breathing dragons into simpering cowards?

Posted by: tbarksdl | July 22, 2010 7:03 AM | Report abuse

"My first impulse was to learn more..."

That is the first impulse of any fair-minded, thinking, person when presented with a provocative sound bite: Learn more. Get the context.

But I am glad at least that the race-baiters have finally been revealed and publicly embarrassed.

PS: To those who say the "real story" is the NAACP crowd cheering. No, the real story is that someone was fired unjustly based on a sound bite and snap judgment.

As for the cheering, some may have cheered because they understood where Ms.Sherrod had been and where she was going. Some may have cheered because sticking it to one of a group that has historically tormented your group feels good. That isn't racism; that is human nature. Some may have cheered because they are genuine died-in-the-wool racists. Yes, some black people are racists. Since when is that news?


Posted by: martymar123 | July 22, 2010 7:03 AM | Report abuse

NO doubt Vilsack got a panicky call from the White House to get rid of her before even learning of the facts.
You can smear Vilsack but it is his boss, Obama, that is behind this pitiful display of moral cowardice and pandering to the lowest level of bullying. Shame on Obama because it is he who sets the tone.

Posted by: elsasands1 | July 22, 2010 7:04 AM | Report abuse

Indeed, the Sherrod tape came from a blogger sympathetic to the right-wing, but she was not fired by the right wing, she was fired by the secretary of agriculture and the White House without hearing her side.

Posted by: suegbic1 | July 22, 2010 7:09 AM | Report abuse

Shirley - our deepest apologies for our clueless President and the inept Mr Vilsack. No doubt they will invite you to Washington for a photo op or a beer. They must try to save their sorry rear ends somehow. After listening to the whole video I applaud you for saying its about helping ALL people. Too bad the other members of the NAACP were hooting and hollerin and laughing and hoping you did nothing to help that farmer. Shirley you are a role model for these racists at the NAACP- perhaps you can be given a position in which you can change their way of thinking. We need someone who will heal..and not keep tearing us apart as a nation. Our President has failed in this regard and many others and our criticism of him is based on his performance, not his race. Congrats to you Shirley- you are about the only one who has truly offered us any hope and change.

Posted by: JUNGLEJIM123 | July 22, 2010 7:39 AM | Report abuse

The Washington Post editorial board’s commentary surrounding Ms. Shirley Sherrod would have more meaning if The Washington Post editorial board actually believed it and operated under its principle. Ms. Katharine Weymouth, publisher, Mr. Fred Hiatt, editorial page editor, and Jo-Ann Armao are not in a strong position to serve as media defenders of truth and justice. They are not in a serene intellectual place to be leading conversations on ethics and doing what is right.

This editorial board, through the literary bloodstream of Ms. Armao attacked me in a previous editorial, “School Daze”, for filing a request for investigation of DCPS Chancellor Michelle Rhee for possible conflict of interest violations to the D.C. Office of Campaign Finance (as well as the federal Hatch Act). The issue is not the editorial attack on me, which was wrong and misinformed, but rather the action of the editorial to print a reply I did not write or approve over my name.

The editorial board of The Washington Post further aggravated the issue by failing to print a retraction or correction. The failure of the editorial board of The Washington Post to print an apology for attributing to me in print and on-line something I did not write attacks the principle of decency in journalism.

The editorial board of The Washington Post has printed numerous opinions questioning the integrity, veracity, ethics, and actions many people. It often writes to politicians to just admit the mistake, tell the truth, and the cover-up is worse than the original sin. Today, the editorial board is critical of President Obama and US Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. Too bad The Washington Post will not follow its own admonition. Too bad “reputable” journalists at The Washington Post have been silent on its own egregious violation of journalism ethics.

Ms. Katharine Weymouth, Mr. Fred Hiatt, Mr. Andrew Alexander, and Mr. Howard Kurtz, fail or refuse to hold The Washington Post to the same standard of judgment it criticizes in others.
Elsewhere within the pages of The Washington Post columnists are weighing in with their views. This collective intellectual hypocrisy of journalism, offers great weight to why District residents and readers of this newspaper have low expectations The Washington Post is a credible newspaper.

The editorial board’s indifference to my repeated requests for a retraction and correction speak volumes about the corporate culture of The Washington Post and its values.

Robert Vinson Brannum
rbrannum@robertbrannum.com

Posted by: robert158 | July 22, 2010 8:02 AM | Report abuse

I'm a conservative and no fan of liberal race baiters and litigants like Ms. Sherrod seems to have been over her career. But this was first and foremost a failure of the conservative blogger and journalists, including Fox, who initially aired the story without offering the context of the whole speech. On the part of Fox, it was a matter of carelessness, not deliberate distortion, and they corrected the record when they became aware of the error. Still, it's on them for sloppiness and a rush to publilsh.

The NAACP's and the Obama administration's panicked and embarrassing damage control measures are another matter and one that they no doubt regret.

That's about all there is to it.

Posted by: Roytex | July 22, 2010 8:29 AM | Report abuse

I'm a conservative and no fan of liberal race baiters and litigants like Ms. Sherrod seems to have been over her career. But this was first and foremost a failure of the conservative blogger and journalists, including Fox, who initially aired the story without offering the context of the whole speech. On the part of Fox, it was a matter of carelessness, not deliberate distortion, and they corrected the record when they became aware of the error. Still, it's on them for sloppiness and a rush to publilsh.

The NAACP's and the Obama administration's panicked and embarrassing damage control measures are another matter and one that they no doubt regret.

That's about all there is to it. Nevertheless we will get endless spinning from left and right, as one can see from many of the comments here.

Posted by: Roytex | July 22, 2010 8:31 AM | Report abuse

Breitbart's target was the NAACP's race-baiting of the Tea Party in conjunction with the NAACP's laughter and applause when Sherrod appeared headed for a justification of her race-based animosity. That's the part King and his colleagues artfully ignore. Breitbart was responing to the meanness and ugliness of the NAACP's racial accusations. I think most people outside the mainstream media got that, even if the dim bulbs inside it did not - so obsessed are they with the frozen liberal narrative of 'racism' dating from about 1967 that they appear to be blind to anything that does not fit inside it. Race-baiting by liberals is pretty mean and ugly, too, but I'll not hold my breath waiting for King to address the impact of such things on our civic culture - or on the politics of race relations.

Posted by: markrichardc | July 22, 2010 8:54 AM | Report abuse

Sorry, the true colors of Fox has been exposed. THey have been blatantly race baiting since the start of this admin - and their viewers are too stupid to see it or agree with their propaganda.

What do all the recent manufactured stories on Fox - ACORN, Van Jones, the NBPP, and Shirley Sherrod have in common?

I wonder who the next black or black organization they'll falsely demonize next. Stick with them lemmings, they're laughing at you all the way to the bank. The scorn should be directed at fox for running loops of continuous lies and misinformation.

Posted by: notfooledbydistractions1 | July 22, 2010 9:03 AM | Report abuse

Wake up Eugene. When ones morals are not based on right or wrong, but whether your left or right, FOX or CCN, Dem or GOP, Liberal or conservative, Tea Partier or Panther, white cop or Black Professor etc. you're bound to overreact.

It pretty bad when the left agrees with stereotyping of the right.

Posted by: flyover22 | July 22, 2010 9:55 AM | Report abuse

Sherrod is obviously still a racist, she has just managed to replace her reparations driven agenda with a Marxist redistributionist one. Now she only hates people that are white AND rich.

Posted by: jhimmi | July 22, 2010 9:59 AM | Report abuse

The administration overreacted. But the real problem was the usual right wing liars that should be sued till they live under a bridge. All of them. They hate this country and constantly try to devide us
-----------------------------------------

I agree the "journalist" is a sleaze. However, if such lies are "usual" and are done "constantly", as you write, then why was the Administration so quick to believe them and act?

Posted by: boog44 | July 22, 2010 10:00 AM | Report abuse

There were lessons for many people here. You DO NOT believe anything you read on a right wing blog or hear on FOX news without verifying it. Mainstream news was guilty of slopping reporting. The Secretary of Agriculture is the only one who stepped up and admitted he blew it. The right wing keeps on trying to pin it on the President despite no evidence that he was involved; that is what they do - the truth is not relevant to them. There are a lot of people who need to learn from this.

Posted by: withersb | July 22, 2010 10:25 AM | Report abuse

I don't know whom to blame. Obama should of asked "so what is her side of the story" when brief about her getting canned. The Fed has the responsibility to investigate before firing. This was not done in the slightest.

I am also upset about the right-wing media. This was an intentional lie. The blog did not say, "look at how the NAACP reacts" it claimed this women was a racist, a complete lie. Fox, without doing a bit of research, perpectuated the lie by broadcasting it.

However, I am dispointed by politicians. Any politician caught misleading (lies) should be booted from office. Why? Because they break the primary principal for them being in office: "To serve the people in an honest, open, and fair way." Misleading us, spreading misconstrued information, or spreading bad information, is a lie. Lies break the public trust. Without the public trust, what service does a politician give. It reminds me of the Arizona governor stating that 80% of murders of police where committed by illegals, when the actual statistics published by Arizona itself but the percentage below 20%. There is a world of difference between 80% and 20% and before she opens her mouth, she should check her facts. Such blatant lies should be prosecuted for "abuse of public office."

We need to prosecute more politicians, both Dem and Rep, for their lies. Get them out of office because of their abuse of our confidence in them and the office they hold.

Posted by: vidusa | July 22, 2010 11:11 AM | Report abuse

Mr. President;
Who acted stupidly this time? You have a bad case of foot in mouth disease and no believes for a minute that Vilsak took this action without pressure from the White House.
"Stupid is as stupid does." -Forrest Gunp

Posted by: desertbells | July 22, 2010 12:02 PM | Report abuse

Was Breitbart's intention to get Sherrod fired or even to get her in trouble? Or was it to highlight the response that the audience (NAACP members) had to her story? I don't know for sure. I think he was trying to respond to the NAACP's resolution by showing that NAACP members appear to exhibit some unflattering bias of their own. Since the unedited tape was the property of the NAACP and they could have easily reviewed it, I don't really understand how they were "snookerd".

Posted by: gardedgarton | July 22, 2010 3:58 PM | Report abuse

By now many have learned the backdrop on the misleading effort by a conservative operative (Andrew Breibart) and conservative mainstream media to harpoon through proxy the public face of the NAACP. If it had not been for due diligence and journalistic reporting by a network considered to be in the non-conservative mainstream media, greater character disparagements would have made.

The NAACP entered into a public street fight with the designee “The Tea Party Express.” However, individuals who have witnessed or experienced a street fight is aware that often it is not the person you are engaged with that you have to be fully aware of its his/her friend/associate standing on the side line or in the crowd that will hit or kick you at an opportune moment. And that is exactly what happened to the NAACP with their admission they were “snookered” --- sucker punched by friends of the Tea Party Express.

On the non-conservative media outlet MSNBC Andrew Breitbart told the interviewer that the video of Mrs. Sherrod was put into his possession months ago. If his word is true, and based on the fact within 72 hours of the NAACP releasing a statement Mr. Breibart released the video, doesn't this shouldn't this raises the issue that he and possibly others were given advance knowledge that the NAACP was expected to issue a statement condemning "elements of the Tea Party." --- Knowledge that could only be given by someone within the NAACP organization?

Maybe it has occurred to them. Mr. Julian Bond being of old school remembers well individuals assigned and others who volunteered for memberships in the civil rights organizations but actually worked for others. Maybe that explains why he inserted the old school word of “snookered” in the organization’s official response, but didn’t say if that meant by outside or inside sources.

Posted by: Mas1 | July 22, 2010 3:59 PM | Report abuse

Andrew Breitbart, Michael Moore: distorting the truth through editing for political purposes.

Posted by: gardedgarton | July 22, 2010 4:05 PM | Report abuse

In the corporate media, any loss for the Republicans and victory for Obama must be pushed to the back pages by a fake scandal engineered by GOP operatives. The big news this week was Obama triumphing over heartless conservatives and restoring unemployment benefits to folks who are jobless through no fault of their own. Undeserving of coverage are the ridiculous claims of reverse racism constantly being flogged by bloggers on the right.

Posted by: dnahatch1 | July 22, 2010 5:31 PM | Report abuse

Interesting. Let's put Mr. King's chest thumping aside. These echo chambers are the worse place in which to get any understanding of events or their impact on our culture. Mr. King forgets that all episodes like Sherrod's are bond together into the whole cloth of this society. So he should think about what is the ultimate good here rather than fixate on actions that are caused by the vulgarity of our politics today. It is disingenuous for Mr. King to talk about poll driven, afraid of the Right politicians when many Blacks felt that Obama couldn't be elected for the same reasons. After 8 years of never hearing an apology or seeing any correction from the White House, you see Vilsack humbly admit his mistake, ask for forgiveness, and offer her job in less than 48 hours of firing Sherrod. You see the President call Sherrod with his regrets for the hell his Administration put her through. I don't see anyone looking for excuses. I see a government that is willing to own up to its mistake. Does this have nothing to do with Obama? Please Mr. King don't lecture Obama on what is right. We just witnessed him and his Administration demonstrating what is right. Admit your mistakes and make amends.

Posted by: richarddyoung | July 22, 2010 6:52 PM | Report abuse

"What's the nation's first black president's excuse" for a lot of what's been going on?
It's good that people are seeing the ugliness of another WH knee-jerk reaction to a racial situation, but they're only able to come to the defense of Ms. Sherrod because she is black and was wronged by a "right wing nut."
The left has pulled the same character assassination on any number of conservatives. Taking their statements out of context. Making things up out of whole cloth. Beating to death things that never happened.

Writers for the WaPo, including Mr. Robinson, continue to wallow in a story about Members of Congress being called the n-word and spat upon by Tea Party protesters on the steps of the Capitol. It wasn't taken "out of context." It never happened. The MOCs recanted. There has been no apology. The "big lie" grows bigger.
Heal thyself, Mr. Robinson.

Posted by: parkbench | July 22, 2010 11:44 PM | Report abuse

"Sherrod’s smearing was the handiwork of a right-wing blogger who was aided and abetted by the right-wing media out to destroy the president of the United States."

Wow. This guy is nuts.

Posted by: mj13 | July 23, 2010 3:37 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company