Ethics probe race angle is ridiculous
There’s a troubling storyline to the ethical travails faced by Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.). Both The Post and Politico ran stories Monday that highlight concern that African American lawmakers are facing added scrutiny. Some would say they are being targeted. And I would say that’s absolutely ridiculous.
First, it should be pointed out that neither Rangel nor Waters has made this claim. Nor has there been an official statement to this effect by the Congressional Black Caucus. Although, CBC member and House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) pretty much gave the theory some credence on “Morning Joe” today. And an anonymous CBC member told Politico that there is a “dual standard, one for most members and one for African-Americans.”
As an African American, I know and understand the sensitivity to unfair prosecution and persecution of blacks in the court of law and the court of public opinion. The reflex to speak against a rush to judgment is as innate as a flinch from fire. But there are times when that sensitivity can blind us to very real questions that have nothing to do with race. In the cases of Rangel and Waters, I have to agree with a tweet by NBC News political director Chuck Todd. Their troubles have to do with “entrenched entitlement.”
Rangel has held his Harlem congressional seat for 40 years. Waters has represented South Central Los Angeles for nearly 20 years. To read the alleged violations by Rangel and Waters is to go into a familiar world of power, access and perks. Rules of conduct were established to guard against abuse and excess. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) formed the Office of Congressional Ethics in 2008 as part of her promise to drain the swamp of corruption in the House. That two powerful, high-ranking and highly regarded members of her own party are facing rigorous scrutiny shows Pelosi meant business. Thankfully, a misguided effort to weaken the OCE by Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio) has gone nowhere.
The proceedings of the ethics committee are supposed to be secret. Only when charges are filed does it become public. But journalists and good government organizations, such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), make it their business to keep the public informed. In fact, CREW has an “Under Investigation” site that chronicles the allegations against House and Senate members and where things stand. As you will see, the ethics committee is an equal opportunity investigator.
| August 2, 2010; 4:53 PM ET
Categories: Capehart | Tags: Jonathan Capehart
Save & Share: Previous: Mama Grizzly anatomy lesson
Next: Russians show U.S. conspiracy theorists a thing or two
Posted by: kitchendragon50 | August 2, 2010 6:24 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: genericrepub | August 2, 2010 6:57 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: slatt321 | August 2, 2010 8:27 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: barrysal | August 2, 2010 11:36 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: barrysal | August 2, 2010 11:38 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Jmacaco4 | August 3, 2010 3:43 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Jmacaco4 | August 3, 2010 3:49 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: bethg1841 | August 3, 2010 7:44 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: dcis1 | August 3, 2010 10:08 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Resonate08 | August 3, 2010 10:43 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: IGotAComment | August 3, 2010 11:23 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: texasnative46 | August 3, 2010 1:01 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: mlemac | August 3, 2010 1:06 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Tright | August 3, 2010 9:58 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Afraid4USA | August 4, 2010 8:25 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: ablum1 | August 4, 2010 4:17 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: texasnative46 | August 4, 2010 5:54 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Martial | August 4, 2010 11:16 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.