Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Why haven't all the world's countries become democracies?

Why haven't all the world's countries become democracies? Here's a provocative new answer.

The question itself may seem romantic and naive. But when Communism was collapsing two decades ago, many people assumed that democracy would sweep the world. Once countries reached a certain standard of living, dictatorships couldn't manage the complexities. Without an ideology to justify their repression, dictators would have no basis to rule. And with open borders, open trade and open communication -- especially the Internet -- they'd be unable to squelch their people's natural desire for freedom.

Now comes Ivan Krastev with the counterintuitive suggestion that those very factors -- openness and the absence of ideology -- may in fact be helping authoritarianism to survive. Krastev, a Bulgarian and one of the world's most original thinkers on subjects like this, propounded his theory, taking Russia as his example, in a speech Tuesday night, the Seymour Martin Lipset Lecture on Democracy in the World at the Canadian embassy in Washington.

It's true that ideology helped the Soviet regime keep its grip for 70 years, he suggested. But ideology also provided the basis for the Soviet Union's undoing. The people who brought the USSR down were former believers in Communism who became disillusioned (think Andrei Sakharov) or current believers who embarked on reform to save the ideology (Mikhail Gorbachev), only to find they could not control the reform process.

Russia's current rulers, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and his subordinates, have the "identity of corporate managers," Krastev said. "It's not about ideas." In Russia today, you can't have dissidents -- because there's nothing to dissent from. "Anti-corruption" is the only available language of protest, he said.

You could, in theory, still have opposition politicians, and many middle-class Russians are disillusioned with their government. But the same Russians, unlike in Soviet days, can freely travel and even emigrate, as millions of the best educated have. This exit option, Krastev said, weakens the incentive to do the very hard and potentially dangerous work of protesting or organizing protests. "Even when they do not emigrate," he said, "they don't try to make Russia like Germany, because they could go to Germany."

None of this proves that Putin's model will be a success -- "Decay is an option, too," Krastev said -- but it may persist longer than many people expected.

Meanwhile, dictators who continue to base their rule on revolutionary ideology and control their people's movements may be more vulnerable than they seem. Which means, Krastev said, that it may be "much easier to have a democratic breakthrough in Iran than in Russia."

By Fred Hiatt  | October 20, 2010; 9:01 AM ET
Categories:  Hiatt  | Tags:  Fred Hiatt  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Yes, we are electing state legislatures, too
Next: Ginni Thomas: Still angry after all these years

Comments

Why ? Because they take one look at the USA's example of Democracy ( it ain't ) and think to heck with that ! America the beautiful has become one of the most corrupt countries in the world , Russia's got nothing on us !

Posted by: Koom | October 20, 2010 10:26 AM | Report abuse

Very surprising to find an opinion in WP that I agree with. As a child of USSR and with family still living in Russia and other parts of former USSR, I can attest that this review is spot on. Someone once told me a great line that describes the current relationship between Russian people and rules - "it is like keeping your dog on the leash and just extending the length of the leash. The dogs thinks it got more freedom, and does not try to pull, But you still have it on the leash and full control of how far the dog can go"
There are no protests that result in anything new; no opposition parties that achieve any real individual freedom reforms to benefit the people. People are still looking up to the govt for solution of all problems, still stretch their hands for wellfare, still expect to get govt built houses, govt run day care and schools, govt run food supply.

Posted by: voiceinthedesert1 | October 20, 2010 1:33 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company