Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Martin O'Malley: the Democrats' rising star?

By Lee Hockstader

In an election defined by discontent, Maryland bucked the national mood Tuesday, voting for contentment in the person of Martin O'Malley, the Democratic governor. His triumph marked the birth of a new star in an otherwise demoralized national Democratic Party.

O'Malley won a second term easily, not just defeating his Republican rival and predecessor, Robert L. Ehrlich, in a rematch, but doubling his 2006 margin of victory. Not bad for a governor who pushed a huge tax increase in 2007, presided over three years of unemployment and economic slowdown and suffered from the widespread sense that Maryland is losing the job-creation sweepstakes to neighboring Virginia.

O'Malley, who won by 14 percentage points statewide, ran up his numbers in large part thanks to suburban Montgomery and Prince George's counties. He won more than three-quarters of roughly 470,000 votes cast in those two jurisdictions combined, including nearly 89 percent in Prince George's, his biggest margin anywhere in the state. His combined margin of victory in the two counties, about 262,000 votes, exceeded his overall statewide margin of 234,000 votes. In other words, without Montgomery and Prince George's, and Mr. O'Malley would have lost the election. (The City of Baltimore also chipped in, giving Mr. O'Malley, the former mayor, a cushion of 100,000 more votes than Mr. Ehrlich received.)

But don't count on Mr. O'Malley lavishing garlands of favors on the Washington suburbs in return for their electoral bounty. As a term-limited governor, he'll have his eye on making the leap to national politics, not on his firm base in one of the bluest of blue states. Faced with huge deficits, Mr. O'Malley will be looking for cuts and savings where he can find them, and the reality is that Prince George's and, especially, Montgomery, are target-rich places to look.

Schools may be one early target. The governor may start by withholding funding intended to compensate richer school systems for their higher costs, particularly for teacher salaries. Mr. O'Malley was able to furnish those funds for the last two years, but only thanks to federal stimulus dollars, which are now running dry.

O'Malley may also stand aside as lawmakers in Annapolis shift the cost of teachers pensions, whose cost to the state has ballooned thanks partly to overgenerous contracts with teachers unions, to localities such as Montgomery.

Heartless? Maybe. But O'Malley, now certified as a rising star, will be able to get away with it, making do with dispensing thank-yous instead of IOUs.

By Lee Hockstader  | November 4, 2010; 10:29 AM ET
Categories:  Hockstader  | Tags:  Lee Hockstader  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Money can't buy happiness -- or elective office
Next: How Castro and Chavez lost the 2010 elections

Comments

Why exactly is he a rising star? He clearly won by a larger margin, but I don't see why he's a rising star within the Democratic ranks. I'm sure the "we have your back" Obama signs didn't hurt.

Posted by: sinesk1 | November 4, 2010 6:37 PM | Report abuse

Are you smoking what CA.a voters decided to keep illegal? I suggest that you get in your car and go over to Va and look for Senator Webb's office to find a likely rising star among democrats. In order for them to move behind the kiss and tell of Hilary Clinton they will need another face lift. It will shift the focus from the sublime to the center and they need a war horse not a guy from Maryland with a nice smile and not a great deal else. If you are trying to make it to the National desk you will need a better slant then this to get a cube with a window. Good Luck

Posted by: 33jayave | November 4, 2010 8:48 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company