Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 11:17 AM ET, 12/17/2010

DADT repeal: the final showdown

By Jonathan Capehart

After a roller-coaster month, the fate of the repeal of don't ask don't tell (DADT) will come down to a dramatic vote tomorrow in the Senate. If you want the lowdown on what went down yesterday to get us to this point, read Chris Geidner's play-by-play in MetroWeekly. Ed O'Keefe's Cliff's Notes version is here.

As Greg Sargent points out, with Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) joining Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) on record saying he would vote to end the ban on gay men and lesbians serving openly in the military, the chamber has the 60 votes needed to end DADT.

We know hearts and minds in Congress have been changed over the last year. The House approved such legislation 234-194, with five Republican votes in May. That number jumped to 15 when that chamber passed the stand-alone bill this week by a vote of 250-175. Looked at another way, the margin of victory nearly doubled from May (40 votes) to this week (75 votes). Now that the action is in the Senate, the repeal of DADT must be an up-or-down vote free of the procedural obstacles and poison-pill amendments that would only serve to keep this shameful and discriminatory policy in place.

DADTprotest.jpg

To those Senators willing to play a game of chicken with the courts let me remind them that there's a reason why Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have practically begged Congress to act. The orderly transition from DADT that they've worked out will go poof if a federal judge does the job that Congress so far has refused to do.

To those Senators tempted to use the bigoted words of Gen. James F. Amos, commandant of the Marine Corps, as a crutch let me remind you that gay men and lesbians aren't the threat to unit cohesion and morale. Servicemembers who can't handle serving alongside someone who was closeted on Monday and then comes out on Tuesday are.

To those Senators who claim to be listening to the American people let me remind them that 77 percent surveyed in the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll favor ending DADT. When the noxious policy emerged on the national scene in 1993, only 44 percent of Americans supported allowing gay men and lesbians to serve openly.

And so that there is no doubt let me remind Senators that the men and women who put on the uniform to protect and defend the United States -- gay or straight -- do so for the same reason: love of country. So, let them serve with dignity and honor. Let them serve openly.

By Jonathan Capehart  | December 17, 2010; 11:17 AM ET
Categories:  Capehart  | Tags:  Jonathan Capehart  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Another sign of American decline?
Next: Child marriage bill UPDATE

Comments

If (or when) they repeal DADT, I bet everytime one of our servicemen/women is interviewed that's always going to be on the list of questions they are always going to be asked.


Posted by: lindalovejones | December 17, 2010 1:10 PM | Report abuse

Jonathan, which president had so little regard for DADT repeal that he appointed the Marine commandant with the bigoted words?

Well, shill? Who?

Posted by: uh_huhh | December 17, 2010 11:37 PM | Report abuse

I’m sure you’re basing your notion of “bigotry” from the many years you spent serving in one of our nation’s armed services, where you saw first hand the “bigotry” that drives the rational behind not allowing homosexuals to serve openly in the US Military. Your intricate and unparalleled understanding of troop morale and unit cohesion has lead you to this irrefutable claim that the United States Military is a bigoted organization.

Posted by: drowningpuppies | December 18, 2010 12:48 AM | Report abuse

That there are homosexuals in the military isn’t a problem as long as they conduct themselves professionally while on duty. No one is investigating their conduct in their private lives.
What I really find interesting is, before DADT, they actually did investigate service members in their off base activities, if they suspected they were homosexual. So if we repeal U.S. Code Section 654 Title 10, does that mean they revert to the previous policy?
PC nonsense and libtard policies are absurd and dangerous.

Posted by: drowningpuppies | December 18, 2010 1:38 AM | Report abuse

If you look a little closer at the vote in the House and Senate it isn't that "they changed their minds" as much as the Military gave them permission to support repeal.

Plus, try telling people in Oklahoma or Alabama that 70% support repeal of DADT.

These votes of support for repeal come primarily from "less-religious" States. LGBT hatred and discrimination is because of religious beliefs, not necessarily political party affiliation.

Posted by: AndrewW1 | December 18, 2010 11:03 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company