Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 4:44 PM ET, 12/13/2010

Dems vs. unions: It's on

By Charles Lane

Next to the drama in Washington, the big political story in 2011 will be the struggle to rein in public-sector unions, whose pay, pensions and health benefits are bankrupting some of the biggest states in the country. Today's Wall Street Journal contained a tough op-ed on public-sector unionism by Minnesota's Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty, a presidential hopeful. Neighboring Wisconsin's ascendant Republicans may try to end collective bargaining for public workers in that state. But GOP moves against public employee unions, the core constituency of the Democratic Party, are no surprise. What's really interesting, as I've written, somewhat obsessively, is the looming struggle between budget-cutting Democrats and the unions.

This is the contest that will determine whether Democrats can survive as a party with a broad political base at the state level, by putting the sustainability of vital public services ahead of the unions' demands -- or whether they will allow their public-sector union allies to drag them into a political death spiral of endless deficits, higher taxes, sluggish growth and declining services.

And the contest has already begun. On a small scale, right in the Washington area, there's the clash between the Montgomery County Council and its public employee unions over proposed legislation to make arbitrators give the county's sorry fiscal situation top consideration when deciding the size of the unions' next contract package. Proposed by Council President Valerie Ervin (D-Dist. 5) of Silver Spring, usually a reliable labor ally, the bill has drawn preliminary support from most of the rest of the council, including a newcomer, Hans Riemer, who won his seat with union backing. Riemer's stance prompted this thuggish outburst from the county employees' union leader, Gino Renne: "You're going to be a one-termer, pal. Welcome to the big leagues."

On a much grander stage, there's New York Gov.-elect Andrew Cuomo's successful effort to recruit business support for his pending battle with that state's public-sector unions. The business community is raising $10 million to counter the expected union ad campaign. Even more striking, Cuomo has the backing of the 100,000-member Building and Construction Trades Council of Greater New York, which, according to the New York Times, argues that healthier state finances and lower taxes will spur development and construction work. "This is not about bashing public-sector unions," that union's chief said. "But without a fiscally sound environment, we will not be able to attract new businesses to the city; we'll continue to lose business."

He's right, of course. The question is: Have state and local governments reached a tipping point, at which the benefits to Democratic politicians -- campaign contributions, mainly -- from currying favor with public sector unions no longer outweigh the costs -- bankruptcy, taxpayer outrage, etc.? Who really runs state and local government in America: the people, through their elected representatives, or the bureaucrats, through their unions? In "blue" jurisdictions from Albany to Rockville, Md., we are about to find out.

By Charles Lane  | December 13, 2010; 4:44 PM ET
Categories:  Lane  | Tags:  Charles Lane  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Health care: Legislating from the Bench
Next: Nixon bigotry: caught on tape -- again

Comments

I never voted for THOSE County Councilmen, and thank goodness I didn't! As a Community Health RN, knowing there is a severe shortage of RN's in this country, these CLOWNS are going to be voting to ROLL BACK pay, hours, jobs, staffing numbers, and the safety of our community by slashing the pay of NURSES! Can you imagine that?

As it is now, County Nursing pay is lower than any competing salary in any Hospital or Doctor's office! Wait till the Maryland Board of Nursing hears how Our wonderful County Council is contributing to the worlds "Nursing Shortage"!
They certainly are angels, aren't they?

Posted by: CountytaxpayingCHNII | December 13, 2010 5:37 PM | Report abuse

By Mr. Lane's reasoning, the leadership of the Republican party and the Republican talking heads are thugs as well. They have certainly stated that they will do anything in their power to assure the President Obama has only one term. Indeed, they place that as their highest priority, as if the country did not face any pressing issue.

A statement that a politician who has just undermined a group that supported him will only have one term in office shows withdrawal of support. Its not surprising to hear strongly worded disappointment in light of a vote to tilt the playing field against workers. Calling such political speech "thuggish" demonstrates deep-seated prejudice against the people who are the only ones still fighting for the interests of working class Americans.

Posted by: daubry | December 13, 2010 8:01 PM | Report abuse

The Democratic Party broke its covenant with working people as long ago as the 1972 Democratic Convention. That convention was supposed to be the most representative ever, but I looked and looked and saw no one really representing me, a working man. That is the reason for the Reagan Democrats, and more recently for the elections of James Webb and Scott Brown to the U.S. Senate.

Posted by: sailhardy | December 14, 2010 8:54 AM | Report abuse

Newsflash: Charles Lane Vs. a Quality WaPost!

As local readers 'somewhat obsessively' note, there's an epic battle between the interests of publishing Charles Lane's work and of keeping the Post as a quality news outlet.

Posted by: rat-raceparent | December 14, 2010 3:17 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company