Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 6:19 PM ET, 01/21/2011

What President Obama is -- and isn't -- campaigning on

By Stephen Stromberg

President Obama's reelection campaign is starting up. The White House announced that the president is moving political advisers back to Chicago, and that he has chosen who will run his campaign. Then on Thursday, Vice President Biden sent millions of Obama fans a document encouragingly titled "Promises Kept," which advertises Obama's accomplishments so far -- at least according to a division of his political team.

The packet -- assembled at Organizing for America, an arm of the Democratic National Committee that emerged from Obama's 2008 campaign infrastructure -- lists economic recovery, health care, education, financial regulatory reform, tax cuts, repeal of don't ask, don't tell. And then there's the section called "Building a Clean-Energy Economy," which boasts about investments in green tech included in the stimulus and new emissions and fuel efficiency rules for cars and trucks. Curiously not mentioned, though, is the president's work to cut non-vehicle carbon emissions -- the core of the stopping the oceans from rising part of his campaign. Perhaps this is merely an implicit admission of a big promise not quite kept -- Obama prioritized health care and financial reform over passing a comprehensive energy bill last year.

Yet the president is beginning to use the regulatory power of the Environmental Protection Agency to curb greenhouse gases and other harmful emissions from American smokestacks. And because Obama hasn't been able to make good on that comprehensive energy bill promise, this approach may well become the centerpiece of his environmental policy. Why leave that out?

Organizing for America spokeswoman Lynda Tran says that there are many worthy details absent from the document, which was meant to be a handy summary of the last two years for OFA volunteers. Even so, it's notable that the president's political operation considers this historic move to regulate carbon less significant than the other items listed. Environmentalists sure don't. Neither do Republicans in Congress. GOP lawmakers have made stopping the EPA a top priority, and Obama's advisers are recommending that the president veto efforts to check his regulators' work. This is a serious fight about the administration's environmental policy.

The president might let lawmakers end EPA greenhouse regulation in return for cooperation on some kind of energy bill in Congress. Depending on the bill the president got, that might be worth it. But what happens if there's no deal and anti-EPA lawmakers attempt to defund the administration's work or formally strip the EPA of its regulatory power? Will Obama issue a high-profile veto? If the president's political team isn't jumping to advertise his support for this policy now, what happens when the issue becomes yet more visible? The Democratic Senate might prevent the president from having to make that choice. Or it might not.

As "Promises Kept" reminds us, carbon-cutting energy policy isn't an obvious political winner, particularly when it's the "command-and-control" regulatory approach available to the EPA. The potential for higher energy bills isn't appealing to voters, and the scheme, which could proceed without additional congressional action, is vulnerable to the "Obama government overreach" narrative. Global warming, meanwhile, is a long-term problem that's still largely hypothetical in the minds of many Americans. It's not all that surprising -- but perhaps it's a tad ominous -- that the president isn't exactly running on it.

By Stephen Stromberg  | January 21, 2011; 6:19 PM ET
Categories:  Stromberg  | Tags:  Stephen Stromberg  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Sy Hersh's loopy crusade
Next: Sorry, Dana Milbank -- I won't quit Sarah Palin

Comments

Posted at 6:19 PM ET, 01/21/2011
What President Obama is -- and isn't -- campaigning on
By Stephen Stromberg

Typical misconstrual of the journalistic mandate. Instead of writing about the 5 W's, you craft a position in current affairs by stating a falacious premise and then proceed to build an article around the fallacy. Castles built of sand Stephen. Question should be what is this man doing campaigning at all? There are 30,000,000+ of US under/un-employed who, along with the 30,000,000+ professional poor soul\victims of illiberalism in inaction, that are stuck in the suck hole (at the brink), being told, "the Jobs aren't KILLED after all". If that's all he's got at this point, we are sure that will make US feel sooo much better about the civvvil, discooourse, to know we and our livelyhoods have only just been kidnapped, as we go to the polls in 2012 and vote this Supreme Gang of incompetents, malpracticing malingerers, and radicals without vetting, Wright back out of there.

Posted by: RichNomore | January 21, 2011 10:59 PM | Report abuse


Companies will be barred from instituting caps on coverage when your costs for treatments goes up due to sickness, you can now get insurance with out caps on coverage at "Wise Health Insurance" search them online.

Posted by: carriemann | January 22, 2011 2:07 AM | Report abuse

What President Obama is -- and isn't -- campaigning on.............

Good question, wrong answer....


The correct answer is, It depends on which audience he is speaking too. As he has consistently done since 1984, his rhetoric changes depending on the group in front of him, Today the sun rises in the east and the next day he's telling the new audience it rises in the North, or West or South.

If this guy thinks he will fool the American public a second time around, he must be getting some good weed from his Mexican buddies.

Posted by: frankn1 | January 22, 2011 9:16 AM | Report abuse

(...)If this guy thinks he will fool the American public a second time around, he must be getting some good weed from his Mexican buddies.

Posted by: frankn1 | January 22, 2011 9:16 AM
-------------------------------------------

Seems like the shipment landed at your doorstep, dude.

Sleep it off, bring all your "second amendment remidies", and report for duty, that war your hero George W. started in Iraq nearly nine years ago still ain't over

Posted by: Supertzar | January 22, 2011 5:39 PM | Report abuse

The Clean Air Act authorizes the EPA to regulate. Are you saying they should not?? How is this "overreach" if you're granted BY LAW to do it. Just let our air be polluted & ignore the law because Repubs do??? That worked out well with the 9/11 First Responders. It only cost them early death!

Posted by: carolerae48 | January 24, 2011 12:45 AM | Report abuse

vote this Supreme Gang of incompetents, malpracticing malingerers, and radicals without vetting, Wright back out of there....No age gap is too wide if you both feel so right.We don't care about the social "norm" but chemistry. Many couples with age gap work out fine and get alone splendidly. We celebrate the age gap love and May-December romance. Check out AgeGapLove.com if you are interested in ageless relationships..

Posted by: sasago | January 24, 2011 10:34 AM | Report abuse

War criminals: unprosecuted. Wars: continuing. Global network of torture gulags: continuing. War against individual privacy: continuing. Deindustrialization and offshoring: continuing. Cost controls on health care: nonexistent. Military costs: a trillion dollars a year and rising.

And this guy expects a vote out of me? I'd rather exchange a false friend for an honest enemy.

Posted by: getjiggly2 | January 24, 2011 10:39 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company