Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 1:15 PM ET, 02/ 1/2011

Why Abbas and Abdullah are scrambling

By Jackson Diehl

Even as Hosni Mubarak continued to resist the hundreds of thousands of pro-democracy demonstrators gathering in the center of Cairo Tuesday, two of his Arab counterparts -- Jordan's King Abdullah and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas -- were scrambling to react. Abdullah dismissed his government and ordered a newly-appointed prime minister to undertake political reforms; Abbas's Palestinian Authority suddenly announced that long-postponed local elections would be held "as soon as possible."

The announcements may or may not portend serious change. But they are another signal of where the Arab uprising of 2011 is heading. Abbas and Abdullah are political weathervanes in the Middle East -- as weak rulers of weak states (or would-be states), they are quickest to tack when a new wind blows into the region.

Both, in fact, have promised reform before. In 2004-5, when President George W. Bush was pressing his "freedom agenda" for the region, the Palestinian and Jordanian leaders enthusiastically announced they were on board. Abdullah appointed a commission to draw up a ten-year plan for political and economic reform and pledged to make his parliament truly democratic. Abbas first embraced Bush's demand that a new Palestinian state be democratic, then agreed to allow Hamas to participate in legislative elections.

The reforms failed.

Abdullah found that his new parliamentarians -- especially the Islamists among them -- were far less interested in democracy than he was. He shelved the reform plan soon after it was completed. Abbas's legislative elections in January 2006 were a still bigger disaster. When Hamas won a plurality and formed a new Palestinian cabinet, a dismayed Bush administration retreated from the freedom agenda.

Will the push for change this time be any different? I think it might be. This time Abbas and Abdullah are being pressed not by an unpopular U.S. president but by a growing wave of popular unrest in the region. Thousands of people demonstrated in Jordan last week, though the protests so far have not acquired Cairo-style momentum, and have not been aimed at Abdullah. Abbas's authority has been steadily weakening, in part because of his failure to renovate the old guard of his Fatah party.

A West Bank election might do the Palestinian Authority some good; Hamas will probably be excluded and young reformers will have a chance to rise. In Jordan Abdullah may decide that he can gain the broad support for liberalization that he lacked five years ago.

Mubarak, by the way, stoutly resisted Bush's pressure in 2005, just as he is resisting his own people now. In the end he agreed to hold a competitive election for president, but after it was over he imprisoned the man who ran against him, Ayman Nour. Bush in the end yielded to the Egyptian strongman. The demonstrators in Tahrir Square are not likely to give up so easily -- or at least, that is what Abdullah and Abbas clearly think.

By Jackson Diehl  | February 1, 2011; 1:15 PM ET
Categories:  Diehl  | Tags:  Jackson Diehl  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Illegal immigrants: Here to stay
Next: Egypt's revolution will not be organized

Comments

What would Charles Freeman do?

Posted by: veritasinmedium | February 1, 2011 1:37 PM | Report abuse

What would Gordon Freeman do?

Posted by: dkp01 | February 1, 2011 2:08 PM | Report abuse

Charles Freeman would do what the Saudis tell him to do

Posted by: gadlut | February 1, 2011 2:10 PM | Report abuse

More apologies and excuses for Dubya. If these Bushites keep wanting to revisit the past, I say let's do it. Let's revisit all his crimes, and hang the SOB.

Posted by: kurthunt | February 1, 2011 2:11 PM | Report abuse

Well then, continuing in the American tradition, why don't we pay for a C.I.A. amplification of the Egyptian revolution, to expedite the process and insure it's outcome, and make sure that revolution and reform occur completely throughout the Middle East? Then, we merely need to sit back and wait for the dust to settle, and see which Islamic devils are left, and, whether they're in our pocket or not. Yes, it's a gamble, but hasn't it always been a roll of the dice? After all, isn't the price of our gasoline at stake here?

Posted by: commonsense4commongoodcom | February 1, 2011 2:27 PM | Report abuse

commonsense4commongoodcom, is actually:

COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD.COM

Posted by: commonsense4commongoodcom | February 1, 2011 2:36 PM | Report abuse

"Bush in the end yielded to the Egyptian strongman"

Jeez, just how deep is the hole cheney/bush dug. Another cheney/bush failure.

Posted by: knjincvc | February 1, 2011 2:47 PM | Report abuse

You always think DIehl can't be more
disgusting
and less honest than the slithering zionist column before.

But you are always wrong.

AND Diehl on elections in the West Bank is such a fine joke. But who can laugh.

Posted by: whistling | February 1, 2011 4:03 PM | Report abuse

free american media is all lies, it is all controlled by zionist masters.

Posted by: MumboJumboo | February 1, 2011 4:40 PM | Report abuse

I'm not usually an apologist for Deihl, but at least criticize what he wrote, not something you invented.

This is a history of Bush's failure to promote democracy, because he didn't know the people and the political forces at work.

One of the factors was that our stake in the outcome wasn't big enough, so Bush made noise but didn't invest much effort. The citizens have more at stake, which brings hope for a stronger effect.

Posted by: j3hess | February 1, 2011 5:37 PM | Report abuse

Yes, Mr. Diehl, but what does your ME expert Marc Thiessen think about the situation, partisanship aside?

Oh, and what is Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren feeding your way?

Do you ever speak with Arabs, or when was the last time you traveled to the Middle East and talked with leaders and real people?

My guess is "rarely if ever" on both of the foregoing.

Posted by: harper-d | February 1, 2011 6:27 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company