Worth Reading: Apple Blocks Political iPhone App? Plus, a Look at AT&T's Attack on Google Voice
First, in case you missed it Monday afternoon, check out my interview with Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.), where he says he and Sen. Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine) are planning a bill to help advance the process for new net neutrality rules at the Federal Communications Commission.
Now, for what's worth reading on the Web:
This wired.com story, if true, raises interesting questions about Apple's apps store, competition and the public interest.
A blog post titled "Google vs. AT&T: Net Neutrality, or the end of free conference calls?" at Saunderslog.com is making the rounds on Twitter. In it, author Alec Saunders explains how AT&T's letter to the FCC accusing Google's voice application of blocking calls to certain rural areas isn't about net neutrality. Instead, he breaks down some of the complexities of rules that require phone service operators to connect calls to remote rural areas and explains: "AT&T appears to be trying to drag Google into their fight over rural access charges."
By
Cecilia Kang
|
September 29, 2009; 8:00 AM ET
| Category:
Cecilia Kang
Previous: Senators Plan Bill To Advance Net Neutrality |
Next: Net Neutrality Threatens the Business Models of Cell Phone Operators, Wall Street Analysts Say

Get This Widget >>

Blogs That Reference This Entry
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/63540
Posted by: squirma | October 3, 2009 12:14 AM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.










This, like previous blog entries, demonsrates that Washington Post reporter Cecilia Kang has an extreme and dangerous bias on the topic of "network neutrality" and should not be reporting stories on it.