Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

FTC vs. Intel: What was deal breaker?

What does the FTC's suit against Intel say about the Obama administration's approach to antitrust in the high-tech sector? Check out the Post Tech's story in the paper today

What we really want to know, however, is what was the deal breaker for Intel and FTC in their weeks-long settlement talks. The FTC's head of competition policy, Richard Feinstein, said in a conference call that we'd have to ask Intel. The chipmaker said in an e-mail exchange that Post Tech needs to ask the agency about issues on the table and why the parties weren't able to reach a settlement. Intel did say that the FTC didn't bring up practices in the GPU sector until a few weeks ago. The agency's entire review has taken more than one year.

The big winner from the FTC's suit? Nvidia, the Silicon Valley-based graphic chip maker.

By Cecilia Kang  |  December 17, 2009; 8:00 AM ET
Categories:  Antitrust , FTC  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: FCC presents broadband ideas, targets phone subsidy and broadcast spectrum
Next: FCC presents broadband proposals, disappointing some consumer groups

No comments have been posted to this entry.

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company