Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Facebook moves to fix privacy loophole after WSJ review

Social networking site Facebook said Thursday that it is fixing a privacy loophole that allowed advertisers to access user identification and potentially other information. The privacy lapse comes amid growing concern from lawmakers and regulators over how social networking sites and Internet companies are treating user data.

The change was first reported on The Wall Street Journal's Web site Thursday evening. The Journal reported that Facebook and other social networking sites such as MySpace had passed along to advertisers the user IDs of subscribers who had clicked on advertisements.

Facebook said that it does not share user information without user consent. But it said it did share some data that may include the user ID of the page but not the person who clicked on the ad.

“We don’t consider this personally identifiable information,” the company said in a statement. (Disclosure: Washington Post Co. Chairman Donald E. Graham sits on Facebook's board of directors.)

Facebook said that under one scenario, if a user took a specific route on the site, advertisers could see that the user clicked on his own profile and then clicked on an ad.

Here’s part of the Journal story:

The practice, which most of the companies defended, sent user names or ID numbers tied to personal profiles being viewed when users clicked on ads. After questions were raised by The Wall Street Journal, Facebook and MySpace moved to make changes. By Thursday morning Facebook had rewritten some of the offending computer code. Advertising companies were given information that could be used to look up individual profiles, which, depending on the site and the information a user has made public, include such things as a person's real name, age, hometown and occupation. Several large advertising companies identified by the Journal as receiving the data, including Google Inc.'s DoubleClick and Yahoo Inc.'s Right Media, said they were unaware of the data being sent to them from the social-networking sites, and said they haven't made use of it. Across the Web, it's common for advertisers to receive the address of the page from which a user clicked on an ad. Usually, they receive nothing more about the user than an unintelligible string of letters and numbers that can't be traced back to an individual. With social networking sites, however, those addresses typically include user names that could direct advertisers back to a profile page full of personal information.

By Cecilia Kang  |  May 21, 2010; 8:16 AM ET
Categories:  Facebook  | Tags: facebook  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: FCC wireless report shows less market competition, spurs debate over FCC response
Next: FTC approves Google merger with AdMob thanks to Apple competition

Comments

welcome to: http://www.netetrader.com

The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan,prada,****, also including the jeans,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment.,after the payment, can ship within short time.


free shipping

competitive price

any size available

accept the paypal

http://www.netetrader.com


jordan shoes $32

nike shox $32

Christan Audigier bikini $23

Ed Hardy Bikini $23

Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15

ed hardy short_tank_woman $16

Sandal $32

christian louboutin $80

Sunglass $15

COACH_Necklace $27

handbag $33

AF tank woman $17

puma slipper woman $30

Posted by: fyashf8uda9 | May 21, 2010 9:16 AM | Report abuse

Brilliant! Now The Post is offering FREE advertising via their comment sections as evidenced by the post by "fyashf8uda9" at 9:16 AM for women's fashion accessories.

Posted by: Gary12 | May 21, 2010 10:17 AM | Report abuse

Isn't Donald Graham the least bit concerned that Facebook is jerking around its users? I would think a responsible board member would insist it be fixed immediately or resign the board.

Posted by: Bitter_Bill | May 21, 2010 10:37 AM | Report abuse

This is one too many times for Facebook to mess around with the issue of trust, which underpins everything about any user's decision to share meaningfully personal information with friends.

The Facebook 'deciders' are losing me today.

Posted by: Zino | May 21, 2010 11:01 AM | Report abuse

Your headline is misleading and suggests Facebook is taking some initiative to fix any of the MANY privacy holes they've opened in the past. In fact, your article tells us that once the WSJ reported a NEW means by which FB violates their TOS with users and offends basic privacy expectations of both users AND advertisers, they spent the night playing catch up to correct at least some of the offending code. I'd say you are doing a good job trying to make Mr. Graham's partnership with the malevolent young exploiters at Facebook look innocuous...but, at some point, folks will see Facebook for the exploitive tool it is, and will see Mr. Graham's role on the Board as a means of involving the Post in FB's dirty shenanigans.

Posted by: las100 | May 21, 2010 12:40 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company