Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Republican House members protest FCC broadband proposal in force

Nearly every Republican member of the House signed a letter to the Federal Communications Commission protesting a plan to redefine broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service. The FCC plans to start reviewing that plan at its June 17 meeting.

The letter (pdfbarton.pdf), sent to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski on Friday, urged the agency to instead to leave it up to Congress to deal with the agency’s quagmire over its authority to regulate broadband service providers such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon Communications.

“The FCC concluded on a number of occasions, under both Democrat- and Republican-led commissions, that broadband is not a telecommunications service but an information service outside the reach fo the Title II common carrier rules,” the lawmakers wrote. Reps. Joe Barton (R-Tex.), ranking member of the commerce committee, and Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), ranking member of the communications subcommittee, were the lead signatures on the letter.

“We write to encourage you not to proceed down your announced path to reclassify broadband service as a phone service,” they wrote. “Such a significant interpretive change to the Communcations Act should be made by Congress.”

Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) on Thursday sent a letter to FCC, expressing concern that the plan to reclassify broadband would be overturned by courts. His letter followed by a similar letter by 74 Democratic House members.

But key Democratic Congressional leaders have also offered their support of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s plan. Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) said they would support Genachowski’s plan and provide Congressional support. Separately those leading Democratic lawmakers said beginning in June, they would proceed to update the Communications Act to clear up confusion of how the federal government oversees the Internet.

Internet service providers have criticized the proposal. Internet content firms such as Google and Skype, meanwhile, support the plan -- which would help usher in new net neutrality rules that would benefit them.

“We welcome this bi-partisan Congressional effort from 285 Democratic and Republican Members of Congress cautioning against the FCC’s proposal to subject broadband services to onerous Title II regulations," said AT&T executive vice president of federal relations Tim McKone. "We look forward to working with the Congress to provide the FCC with more narrow and targeted authority to protect the open Internet in a way that will not pose risk to jobs and needed investment.”

Analyst Rebecca Arbogast of Stifel Nicholas said in a note that increased pressure by lawmakers is expected but probably won't derail Genachowski's effort.

"We believe the FCC will continue on this course unless some external factor -- the White House or Congress -- intervenes and/or there is a path to a settlement that would provide the agency the authority it needs to pursue those parts of the national broadband plan facing legal uncertainty," she wrote in a research note Friday.

By Cecilia Kang  |  May 28, 2010; 1:40 PM ET
Categories:  Broadband  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: FCC questions inclusion of wireless in redefinition of broadband
Next: Yahoo jumps into social networking, using e-mail for sharing

Comments

Senator Ted Stevens: Ardent conservative GOP'er: "The Internet is a series of tubes that we blow into to push the stuff through".


All you need to know about the GOP's stand on protesting anything involving technology.

Posted by: swatkins1 | May 28, 2010 7:29 PM | Report abuse

Contrast that with the Democrat Albert Gore who not only invented the Internet, he fixed Love Canal, cured cancer, and he makes a delicious apple pie.

We're fortunate to have Al Gore on our side. Imagine if the other side got him.

Posted by: Ombudsman1 | May 28, 2010 10:43 PM | Report abuse

Contrast that with Ombudsman1, who says he invented sliced bread, and with Ronald Reagan, who says he invented selling arms to terrorists.

Posted by: Garak | June 1, 2010 12:38 PM | Report abuse

It's interesting that this controversy comes at about the same time as the one involving the Gulf oil spill. There too we had demands that experts other than those working for BP evaluate how much oil is entering the Gulf and lo, when outside experts became involved they found that BP provided false numbers. Now we have the FCC about to evaluate the speeds of Broadband provided by the big telecommunications companies. Can it be that they will find these conmpanies are telling us phony speeds? Just look at these Congressional puppets of these corporations! They're frightened that the FCC is embarking on a program of real regulation. Hurray for Julius! Hurray for Nancy Pelosi and the other Congresspeople who support real regulation and the notion that government experts should evaluate what corporations provide us with. Can you imagine the prospect of the Drug, Insurance, Banking and other industries evaluated and regulated precisely that way? Wonderful!

Posted by: dansing1 | June 2, 2010 10:19 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company