Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Update: Key Dem lawmakers call for rewrite of 1996 Telecom Act

Update: With letter from 74 Democratic lawmakers to FCC Chairman, opposing plan to redefine broadband.

Key Democratic lawmakers said Monday that they are seeking to update communications laws, a move aimed at clarifying murky interpretations over federal oversight of the Internet.

In a brief statement, Congressional Commerce Committee chairmen Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.) and Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) said they would "start a process to develop proposals" to update the Communications Act. Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), chairman of the communications subcommittee and Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.), chairman of the communications subcommittee, joined in the announcement.

The lawmakers said that starting in June, they will invite stakeholders to participate in bipartisan meetings to address issues and concerns over federal oversight of Internet services and businesses. They said their offices would release a list of topics for discussion and details on how they will go about updating the 1996 Telecommunications Act.

The move comes amid increased uncertainty over the government's role as watchdog for Internet service providers such as AT&T and Comcast as well as the software and services that ride over those pipes such as Google's search engine and social networking site Facebook. The Federal Communications Commission announced earlier this month that it would redefine broadband networks -- the pipes owned by Verizon and Time Warner Cable -- as telecommunications services after a federal appeals court cast fresh doubts over the agency's ability to regulate Internet access providers. The Federal Trade Commission enforces consumer protection laws that hold social networking sites and applications such as Google's Street View accountable when user privacy is violated. But the agency isn't a rule-making agency in the same way the FCC is, and some privacy and consumer advocacy groups have urged Congress to give the FTC more muscle to create rules for Internet applications, which are largely unregulated. The FTC can create rules but the burden of carrying them out is heavier.

A Senate staffer, who was not authorized to speak on the record, said the announcement is a recognition that current law doesn't reflect the changing landscape of the Web- and mobile-centric communications landscape. The staffer said the move was meant to complement the FCC's broadband reclassification proposal. The lawmakers don't intend, as proposed by some network operators, to preempt the FCC's plan.

Some of the questions expected to be raised revolve around what agencies oversee Internet applications such as Facebook, Skype and Google. Google's Street View data collection from WiFi networks raised fresh questions over whether that episode touched on communications oversight and privacy protections, for example.

The FCC declined to comment on the announcement. But in a blog post in early May, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, argued that the agency has oversight of the transmission component or broadband services -- in other words, the pipes that push through bits and bytes through the Web.

"Consumers do need basic protection against anticompetitive or otherwise unreasonable conduct by companies providing the broadband access service (e.g., DSL, cable modem, or fiber) to which consumers subscribe for access to the Internet," Genachowski wrote. "It is widely accepted that the FCC needs backstop authority to prevent these companies from restricting lawful innovation or speech, or engaging in unfair practices, as well as the ability to develop policies aimed at connecting all Americans to broadband, including in rural areas."

A change in communications law will surely upset constituents on many sides. In 2006, lawmakers tried unsuccessfully to update the 1996 Act, an effort that largely fell apart over a disagreement whether net neutrality should be included in a legislative rewrite.

Tom Tauke, executive vice president of Verizon Communications, has called for an overhaul of communications law. But he's also called for a light regulatory touch (as has Google CEO Eric Schmidt).

Meanwhile, dozens of lawmakers expressed their opposition to the FCC's plan. In a letter sent Monday to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, 74 Democratic lawmakers described reclassification of broadband as a "distraction."

"The expanded FCC jurisdiction over broadband that has been proposed and the manner in which it would be implemented are unprecedented and create regulatory uncertainty," the lawmakers said. Here's a copy of the letter from NetCompetition.org.

By Cecilia Kang  |  May 24, 2010; 3:54 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Washington Post editorial critical of FCC move to oversee broadband
Next: Google touts its economic impact amid increased scrutiny

Comments

I doubt any complimenting is going on. Try "complement".

Just because you know how to use a spell checker doesn't mean you can spell...

Posted by: jiji1 | May 24, 2010 6:30 PM | Report abuse

If memory serves me well, this Act is the reason I have a significant charge added to my telephone bill each month. This "rewrite" could not possibly increase that charge, could it? Guess I will have to ask my senators and congressional representative about that prospect.

Posted by: numbersch13 | May 24, 2010 8:50 PM | Report abuse

I, for one, am absolutely ready for all ISPs that enjoy liberty and abhor government regulation of speech and its means of communication to shut down the web, until or unless the FCC abandons this Chinese-style power grabs! We all might rediscover the joy of directly interacting with those in our communities in the interim.

Posted by: UncomfortableTruths | May 25, 2010 6:21 AM | Report abuse

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski is moving to enforce net neutrality rules that would prevent the small number of dominant ISPs in this country from discriminating against innovative startup companies that don't have the deep pockets to purchase preferred access to the high speed lane. It seems obvious that the big tellcos, Verizon, AT&T and others as well as the big cable monopolists, Commcast and their ilk have spent their money well on the Democratic side of the Senate. Of course the Republicans have been in their pockets for years as well, witness the FCC under Bush the Lesser. Its a shame that so few of either party will stand up for what is best for the American people.

Posted by: RandomArrow | May 26, 2010 12:29 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company