Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 7:00 AM ET, 12/13/2010

Net neutrality lobbying to peak this week

By Cecilia Kang

Expect lobbying around net neutrality to reach fever pitch through Tuesday. After that, the Federal Communications Commission will go into its bunker to deliberate a draft of rules that will be voted on Dec. 21.

One group, Free Press, plans to let the FCC know that it doesn't like what it has heard so far. The public interest group will deliver a petition to the agency, with 2 million signatures, saying draft rules that don't regulate wireless networks with anti-discrimination provisions do not go far enough. The petition also will call for stronger rules that prohibit network operators from offering paid prioritization of some services that could effectively make the delivery of other Web sites worse. Free Press and dozens of other media reform and consumer advocacy groups jointly sent a letter along these lines last week.

AT&T executive vice president Jim Cicconi continued to make his rounds at the FCC last week, meeting with Chairman Jules Genachowski's staff and Republican commissioners Robert McDowell and Meredith Attwell Baker. Cicconi stressed that any rules approved by the commission shouldn't go beyond legislative proposals offered earlier this year that keep wireless networks largely free of regulation. AT&T has been among the most active companies lobbying on the issue in recent weeks.

The Open Internet Coalition, a group that represents some public interest groups along with Silicon Valley giants such as Google, Facebook and Amazon, plans to send a letter Monday to Genachowski saying it won't support the rules as they reportedly stand. The OIC wants clear definitions on what a broadband service provider is; equal rules applied to wireless networks; and a legal presumption that paid prioritization won't be allowed.

Related stories:
FCC's Clyburn optimistic about net neutrality consensus

FCC's net neutrality plan gets picked apart from all sides

FCC's net neutrality plan opens doors for paid fast lanes, higher rates for consumers

By Cecilia Kang  | December 13, 2010; 7:00 AM ET
Categories:  AT&T, Comcast, FCC, Net Neutrality  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: End near? Comcast, NBC meet with FCC, Justice on proposed Internet video conditions
Next: The Circuit: An introduction and this morning's tech news

Comments

Cecilia, where' the reporting on why only the special interests like Free Press, OIC and Public Knowledge but the rest of us haven't?

I have blogged on the furtive situation here:

http://mediafreedom.org/2010/12/why-should-we-be-guessing-fcc-show-us-your-new-and-improved-net-neutrality-reasoning/

Posted by: MikeWendy | December 13, 2010 9:46 AM | Report abuse

Sign the petition to "FOIA" Public Knowledge, Free Press and OIC to see the FCC's hidden Net Neutrality order:

http://mediafreedom.org/2010/12/“foia”-petition-to-digital-“consumer-rights”-groups-to-see-fcc’s-hidden-net-neutrality-order/

Posted by: MikeWendy | December 13, 2010 10:51 AM | Report abuse

Cecilia Kang, Google's Reporter and Lobbyist at The Post, mentions several groups which are lobbying for even more onerous regulation of the Internet but only one entity - AT&T - which is opposed to it. She appears to be attempting to create the false impression that there is little opposition to destructive, costly regulation of the Net. She also fails to note that the DC lobbying outfit Free Press, like Cecilia herself, lobbies for Google's regulatory agenda. When will the Post dismiss Kang and let her move on to the job at Google for which she is obviously "paying forward?"

Posted by: LBrettGlass | December 13, 2010 7:23 PM | Report abuse

"Cecilia, where' the reporting on why only the special interests like Free Press, OIC and Public Knowledge but the rest of us haven't?"

Mike, with such lucid, cogent thought like that rumbling over in the pro-telecom barracks, why would anyone give net neutrality even a passing glance?

Other than the fact that they've graduated 3rd grade.

Posted by: rmcdowell10 | December 14, 2010 3:13 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company