Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 3:30 PM ET, 12/ 2/2010

Congressman promises Internet privacy bill with do-not-track program for youth

By Cecilia Kang


Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said Thursday that he plans to introduce a privacy bill next year aimed at protecting youth from being tracked online.

The bill would include a do-not-track feature that would block marketers and prevent youth from having their personal identification collected or profiled on the Web, Markey said during a House hearing to deliberate a “Do Not Track” program recommended by privacy groups.

“For many kids today, the Internet is like online oxygen – they can’t live without it,” Markey said during the hearing. “But kids growing up in this online environment also need protection from dangers that can lurk in cyberspace.”

Markey’s proposal focuses on children and wouldn’t cover all Internet users.

Earlier this week, the Federal Trade Commission recommended a do-not-track mechanism – most likely through a Web browser – as one way to better protect Internet users from behavioral advertising.

Advertisers, however, have criticized the idea, saying they are implementing their own online tools that would give users more options to protect their data from third-party marketers and Web sites. Among those is an icon that appears on Web pages that users can click on to opt out of data collection.

Mike Zaneis, senior vice president of the Interactive Advertising Bureau, said in an interview that Web sites such as Yahoo and others have begun implementing the icon. To force companies to adopt browser technology that lets Web sites know not to collect information about users, he said, would be technologically and financially burdensome.

“The concept would mean pivoting midstream when we are launching a program which is successful,” Zaneis said.

He also said the idea of stopping the tracking of individuals is a “false promise.” Companies that count traffic for Web sites such as washingtonpost.com, could be blocked from access to user activity, he said. That could hurt the advertising and media industry, which depends on such partners, he said.

But FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said Wednesday that a plan for a browser-based do-not-track mechanism could be mandated through legislation or developed voluntarily by companies and enforced by the FTC. He said Google, Mozilla and Microsoft have already experimented with such technology, which would likely involve “persistent cookies” that are used to inform sites of user’s privacy preferences.

So far, self-regulation -- which IAB members Google, IAC, NBC Universal and others support -- has fallen short, he said.

In its list of recommendations to beef up consumer protection online, the FTC wrote:

Although many of these companies manage consumer information responsibly, some appear to treat it in an irresponsible or even reckless manner. And while recent announcements of privacy innovations by a range of companies are encouraging, many companies – both online and offline – do not adequately address consumer privacy interests.


Related stories:
FTC pitches do-not-track system to let Internet users opt out of data collection

Internet privacy could be priority in next Congress

By Cecilia Kang  | December 2, 2010; 3:30 PM ET
Categories:  FTC, Privacy  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Verizon got a $1.5 billion credit boost from Federal Reserve
Next: Klobuchar wants more vigorous FCC oversight of cell phone billing practices

Comments

Absolutely pointless.

The computer is not going to know if the person surfing the web is a kid or an adult, unless the user tells it. If the user is asked "are you over 18" any kid is going to click "yes" to keep from being shut out of certain sites.

The people who write these bills should think before they write.

Posted by: jeff20 | December 2, 2010 7:03 PM | Report abuse

I'm a pillow maker. They range from $50-$200. On an art level they are each unique. Is Fluff and Puff service still operating in Washington? They just cleaned pillows and made a bundle doing it.

Posted by: jobandon | December 2, 2010 8:22 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company