Collin Finnerty Trial Judge: Blog Gossip Fan?
Is D.C. Superior Court Judge John Bayly a secret blog addict?
As today's testimony drew to a close in the Collin Finnerty assault trial in D.C. Superior Court, Judge Bayly told the lawyers he had one last matter to take up with them before adjourning:
A blog item had come to the judge's attention reporting that Finnerty, 19, had been sighted at a Glover Park party earlier this month--which would be a violation of the judge's order that the Duke University lacrosse player adhere to a 9 p.m. curfew and stay away from alcohol. The judge sternly spelled out the blog posting to the courtroom, saying that the report appeared on "something called Wonkette."
Defense lawyer Steven McCool immediately denied the allegation: "Wonkette doesn't know what they're talking about." McCool said Finnerty, who has been indicted on rape charges in the Duke lacrosse/exotic dancer case, wasn't even in Washington this weekend, but rather was at home in New York.
But Bayly had misquoted the Wonkette item, which claimed on the basis of an unnamed tipster's email that Finnerty had been seen at a party back on July 1, not this past Saturday night, as the judge relayed it to the lawyers.
Bayly was not satisfied with the defense response: "I want to let you know I'm going to look into it," he said.
Why was the judge making a fuss over a blind item in a blog that specializes in uncorroborated, unsourced gossip? It sounded like Bayly didn't even have a clear handle on exactly what a blog was. Would he have brought this up in open court if his clerk had simply heard a rumor repeated while riding in on the Metro this morning?
Before his indictment in North Carolina, Finnerty, like the other suspects in the Georgetown assault case, was headed for a diversion program under which the misdemeanor charge would have been dropped in exchange for the defendants doing some community service and staying out of trouble. But that deal was revoked for Finnerty in light of his legal troubles in the Duke case.
The trial continues tomorrow.
By Marc Fisher |
July 10, 2006; 6:11 PM ET
Previous: Meet Junior and Felix. One Will Be Your Senator. |
Next: Lawn Signs and Groceries: Mayoral Metrics
Posted by: Very funny | July 10, 2006 10:08 PM
Sounds like the judge is salivating at the prospect of putting Finnerty in jail. He assails his attorneys for his missing a curfew (although he had permission to do it), and threatens him with jail.
Now, he's reading Wonkette and then says that he's going to check into the matter after the attorney denies it. (So he is calling the attorney a liar?)
God help me if I ever have to go before a court which is already determined to put me in jail no matter what I have done or not done.
Posted by: Seahawk | July 10, 2006 10:40 PM
It sounds to me as though Judge Bayly is DYING to put Collin Finnerty in jail. Moreover, since Durham DA Mike Nifong labeled the lacrosse players as vicious racists, a jail sentence in a place like D.C. (or North Carolina) would be hit or miss for any one of them.
Once again we see the double-edged sword of this case. On the one hand, these three boys must be going through total hell. On the other hand, Americans are seeing how horrifying the U.S. criminal system can be once someone falls into the grinding of the machine.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 11, 2006 6:19 AM
Very funny:
Before personally attacking a 20 year old, consider two things. First, Pareene did not "slander" Finnerty - the tipster that saw Finnerty at the party wrote the "convicted" line. Second, the racist comment was made by the "operative" in the AIM conversation, not by Pareene.
I agree that it was poor editing w/regards to the Finnerty post, and bad taste w/regards to the Malkin post. But by personally attacking Pareene without knowing him or the facts, aren't you engaging in the very behavior of which you're complaining?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 11, 2006 9:39 AM
Pareene slandered Finnerty by publishing the "tipsters" slander. Same with the "operative." Even if "tipster" and "operative" are real people and even if it really was with them that the slander originated, it is slander to republish it and the republisher is just as liable for it as the original "tipster" or "operative." The idea is to protect someone against defamation. That protection would be too easily defeated by saying, simply, "I didn't say it - HE did. I just published what HE said."
Posted by: Howard | July 11, 2006 9:53 AM
Geez - you people make me want to start reading Wonkette again just to spite you.
Posted by: h3 | July 11, 2006 10:31 AM
That the Judge would actually question the Lawyer in open court over an anonymous tip in a blog like Wonkette shows a prejudical viewpoint!
He was wrong on the first item regarding breaking the court imposed curfew and now this and now this!
The most salient fact that cam out of yesterday's court session was both sides agree that Finnerty never hit Bloxsom! Why is this case even happening?
Posted by: Marco2006 | July 11, 2006 3:02 PM
Major Pet Peeve: People, please remember. Slander is spoken. Libel is written.
Posted by: Mitch | July 11, 2006 3:14 PM
"Moreover, since Durham DA Mike Nifong labeled the lacrosse players as vicious racists, a jail sentence in a place like D.C. (or North Carolina) would be hit or miss for any one of them.
Once again we see the double-edged sword of this case. On the one hand, these three boys must be going through total hell. On the other hand, Americans are seeing how horrifying the U.S. criminal system can be once someone falls into the grinding of the machine."
Exactly true. This young man (Finnerty) could end up scarred for life by this. A white "racist" in DC prison? And the only thing he did wrong (no thinking person actually thinks hes guilty of rape) was at a DC bar, where all of the participants were somewhat intoxicated. Grinding of the system indeed.
Posted by: pda | July 11, 2006 10:13 PM
I say kudos to Judge Bayly for "looking into it." I can guarantee you that many a criminal defendant in this town has had his bail revoked on evidence more flimsy than a "wonk'd" sighting on Wonkette. Oh, wait. Finnerty is a wealthy white boy. They're the only ones who are presumed innocent. Sorry, I forgot.
Posted by: calling it like i see it | July 11, 2006 11:11 PM
Oh, fer cripes sake! All this is is that the judge heard about the alleged sighting and brought it to the attention of both sides.
Obviously the blind item alone can't be used as any kind of evidence -- it's hearsay twice over. But, if the prosecutor could find a partygoer who could testify to seeing Finnerty there . . .
Until then, it's a long way from 'rumor' to 'salivating'.
Posted by: Looking into it | July 12, 2006 11:46 AM
This whole appearance seems bogus. What happens when the trumped up case in NC gets thrown out of court ? Does this guy then get out of jail because he did not violate the judge's orders?
Posted by: jmsbh | July 12, 2006 3:37 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.

What sentient being doesn't know that Wonkette is now a slander merchant corporate gossip site run by the Gawker/Defamer Nick Denton?
Is D.C. Superior Court Judge John Bayly that dumb, or is he just one of those senile jurists who should have retired years ago?
Somebody show him how to do a google search. He could look up the new Wonkette Editor 20-year old dropout Alex Pareene who looks to be next week's Ben Domenech; a slick out-of-control liar to the core.
It should be noted that Alex Pareene slandered Finnerty in that post on the Duke Lacrosse case falsely claiming "There were other Duke "laxers" there but he (Finnerty) was the only convicted one."
What conviction is that?
I hope if the party item is false (it has the ring of a malicious lie planted by one of Bloxsom's Georgetown buddies, perhaps Pareene himself) that the deep-pocketed Denton is sued into eternity
Denton is the true bottom-feeder of the internet.
(The real hate crime here is that some rich white guy funds a 20-year Pareene to blog his sexism, racist garbage like this one:
http://www.wonkette.com/politics/michelle-malkin/we-are-selling-our-tv-and-only-watching-this-from-now-on-175134.php
Ana Marie Cox, where are you?