Print Columns   |   Web Chats   |   Blog Archives   |  

Potomac Primary: The Wynn-Edwards Showdown in Maryland

Ask Donna Edwards a question, and the candidate for Congress tells a personal story about how she struggled without health insurance, helped her son get help overcoming learning disabilities or nearly lost her house to foreclosure.

"Whenever there's a complex issue, Miss Edwards has two tactics," complains her target in Tuesday's Democratic primary, Al Wynn, the eight-term congressman who represents Prince George's and Montgomery counties. "She shows her pain -- 'I've been foreclosed on, too' -- and then she says, 'Let's find a way to attack Al Wynn.' "

To which Edwards replies, "I don't think it's so bad to have politicians who understand people's lives."

And on they go, sniping into the night. In Maryland's 4th Congressional District, the rematch between Rep. Wynn, whose scowling, impatient demeanor says he thinks he has better things to do than persuade voters to keep him in office, and challenger Edwards, who came within 3 percentage points of ousting Wynn two years ago, is a big draw.

Whatever the reason -- the Iraq war, the economy, the TV writers' strike -- it's standing room only at an Edwards-Wynn debate at Prince George's Community College in Largo. But the gales of laughter pouring out of the auditorium have nothing to do with the two main contenders. It's the other candidates, four more Democrats and three Republicans, who have the audience laughing both at and with them.

Ask the two top contenders about illegal immigration, and you know their answers before they open their mouths. Secure the borders, create a path to legal status, the usual stuff.

Now listen to the also-rans, the guys who ponied up $100 to get on the ballot because they have something to say.

"Lock all the governors and senators in a room, and don't let them out till they reach a fair solution," says George McDermott, a Prince George's businessman who lists his education as "the school of hard knocks."

"If we had 8 million Canadians coming in, nobody would say a word," says Upper Marlboro real estate broker George Mitchell. "So let's tell it like it is: It's racism, and we need to stop it."

"I'm one-eighth Cherokee," says candidate Peter James, a Republican from Germantown who invented a robot lawnmower. "As far as I'm concerned, you're all illegals."

In this era of personalized politics, in which everyone with access to a computer can post his own manifesto, voters have returned to the coarseness and cacophony of our revolutionary roots, a time of roiling partisan battles and rambunctious rhetoric.

At the presidential level, candidates stick inside a very narrow rhetorical range. Some of them speak in a more confessional style than, say, Richard Nixon or Lyndon Johnson ever did. For the most part, though, they either speak in an insider patter that is incomprehensible to most civilians, or they hide behind oversimplified blather that treats voters like morons.

Presidential candidates who dare to break the mold are often greeted as folk heroes. A Ross Perot once wowed a chunk of the nation with dense economics lectures. A Barack Obama packs arenas by employing a few simple, heartfelt poetic devices.

But in a congressional race, while the major candidates seem stuck on lobbyists' money and out-of-state donations, the lesser challengers -- the ones who spend more time talking about issues than raising dollars -- are free to reflect their passions. The crowd eats it up.

When Michael Babula, an economist from Montgomery Village running as a Democrat, challenges the others to march with him in New York's gay pride parade, Wynn gingerly raises his hand, whereupon Edwards glances over and then quickly flicks her fingers in the air, too. When it's his turn to speak, Mitchell hastens to explain why he raised his hand: "I just want to clarify: I'm not gay. I'm a full-blooded American."

By the time McDermott flipped against the audience, chastising them for interrupting the candidates -- well, mainly Edwards -- with applause and cheers, blaming them for the way in which Congress is "going to hell" and demanding that everyone "stop all this bickering and bull----," the audience is almost giddy.

The also-rans are so entertaining that you almost forget to notice that Edwards and Wynn are still at it. To them, he's an out-of-touch junketeer who's in the pockets of big donors, and her campaign is "negative, nasty, and mean-spirited," as Wynn said in a chat on washingtonpost.com yesterday.

At one point in the forum, Jason Jennings, a financial planner from Silver Spring running for the Democratic nomination, announces he's "going to be honest with you, though I know people don't like honesty, because you keep electing people who lie to you."

The crowd acts all offended, showering the candidate with boos. But look around the room: Everybody's smiling. They're having a ball.

Join me at noon today for "Potomac Confidential" athttp://www.washingtonpost.com/liveonline.

By Marc Fisher |  February 7, 2008; 11:11 AM ET
Previous: Potomac Primary: Barry to Endorse Obama | Next: Payday Loans: Va GOP Leads The Way

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Wynn is not my favorite Congressman, but Edwards' campaign ads are so negative I've taken to hitting the mute button when they come on TV. I've also caught several of her interviews with the media and I'm left with the idea that this is just one very unhappy and angry individual whose life experiences don't come close to mine or most people. Thanks Mr. Fisher for giving me the idea of voting for one of the "also rans." They couldn't be worse than either Wynn or Edwards.

Posted by: thanks for the idea | February 7, 2008 3:10 PM

While this is a nice fluff piece that does slide in some decent observations, it doesn't reflect the real issue discussed.

Google "Money as Debt" to understand the debt issue that is made "wage slaves" of us all.

Posted by: Peter "Indian" James | February 8, 2008 12:22 AM

It's time for change! I will not vote to return Wynn back to Congress. What has he really done for the folks he represents?

Posted by: Al F | February 8, 2008 1:55 PM

Marc,

Contrary to what your opinion, I am no also-ran. I am an individual who has spent thousands of dollars of his own money in a race where I can count on media outlets to anoint the worthy candidates based on the amount of money they raised. Simply because the odds are against me, it doesn't mean that I stand no chance. These types of changes rarely happen overnight and require sacrifice, patience and perserverance.

Since you (and many people involved in politics) ascribe to the view that the people who don't sell their soul to the highest ideological bidder are somehow also-rans, you get the corrupt, incompetent and short-sighted government that you deserve.

It's the rest of us who vote who don't get the candidates we deserve. You know, the lesser challengers -- the ones who spend more time talking about issues than raising dollars. What a horrible approach to leadership. If you are a voter in the 4th district and care about hardworking, ethical and competent government, then go to my web site (www.jasonjenningsforcongress.com), see what I have to say in my words and in the videos, and THEN decide for yourselves.

Jason

Posted by: Jason Jennings | February 8, 2008 10:48 PM

I am not exaggerating when I say that I receive Edwards campaign direct mail pieces every day. Every single day. In spite of this, I can't identify her qualifications. Her website is vague on the details of her accomplishments, and as far as I can tell, she has never held public office of any kind. I will grant that she seems to be good at raising money and mobilizing supporters. The issues she is most passionate about are also state-level issues. Perhaps I'd be more inclined to vote for her if she had a record in the General Assembly. As it is, all I have to judge her on is the annoying mail and phone calls from her campaign.

Posted by: ZF | February 8, 2008 10:55 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company